The Two-Drink Tab and the Slurred Regular
It is 9:40 p.m. at a neighborhood bar. A man you know as a regular, Dale, has been at the corner stool for about two hours. He ordered two pints of 6% IPA, paid cash, and has been nursing the second one for 45 minutes. When he stands to use the restroom, he steadies himself on the bar top for a beat, then walks with a wide, deliberate gait. On his return he knocks his glass with his forearm, laughs too loudly, and his speech is slightly thick. He tells you he is fine, he only had two, and he has a 20-minute drive home. His face is flushed and his eyes look glassy. A coworker says, "He's a big guy, two beers is nothing, he's just tired."
1. Identify the observable signs of intoxication and explain why the two-drink count does not settle the question.
Read the worked answer
Observable signs cluster into three groups. Physical: flushed face, glassy eyes, unsteady balance when standing, wide deliberate gait, and a fine-motor miss (knocking the glass). Behavioral: disproportionately loud laughter and a defensive "I'm fine" when no one accused him. Speech: slightly thick, slowed articulation. These are exactly the standard impairment indicators, and several appear together, which matters more than any single one.
The drink count is weak evidence for four reasons. First, a 6% pint is roughly 1.5 standard drinks, so "two pints" is about three standard drinks, not two. Second, the count is self-reported and people under-report, especially when they anticipate driving. Third, tolerance shifts how a given BAC looks but does not remove impairment, so a large regular can appear functional at a level that still slows reaction time. Fourth, absorption depends on food, time, and body composition, so the same intake produces different BACs in different people. Judge the person in front of you, not the arithmetic.
2. The coworker argues Dale should be served because he is a regular and a big man. How should you respond, and what do you do next?
Read the worked answer
Politeness and familiarity are not defenses, and size is not a license. The legal standard is whether the guest appears intoxicated, not whether the server believes the guest can handle it. Serving a visibly impaired person exposes the server and the business to liability, and "he's a regular" is the kind of reasoning that produces exactly the incidents regulators cite.
Next steps, in order: stop alcohol service immediately and do not pour a third drink. Offer water and food. Keep the tone low and non-accusatory, and do not debate his count in front of others. Address the drive directly: "I'm not comfortable sending you out behind the wheel tonight." Offer concrete alternatives: call a rideshare, call a friend, or wait an hour with coffee and food while you monitor. If he insists on driving, escalate to the manager and, if he tries to leave impaired, call local police non-emergency rather than physically blocking him. Document the time, the signs, and the actions taken. Do not let the coworker override the call; the manager should reinforce it.