The Teen Driver and the Written-Off Car
In Ontario, Sophie, 17, is a G2 driver listed as an occasional driver on her mother Claire's auto policy. The policy has $1 million third-party liability, collision with a $1,000 deductible, and OPCF 27 (liability for damage to non-owned autos). Sophie borrows her friend's car, which is insured by the friend's family, and rear-ends a delivery truck, causing $14,000 damage to the truck and $6,000 to the borrowed car. The friend's family insurer denies coverage because the friend lent the car without permission from the policyholder. Claire calls her broker, Dan, asking whether her policy responds and whether Sophie's licence will be affected. Dan must also consider that Sophie failed to report the accident within the policy's required timeframe.
1. Determine which policy responds to the damage to the delivery truck and the borrowed car, and explain the reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Two coverages must be separated: third-party liability and physical damage.
- Delivery truck ($14,000): this is third-party liability. Sophie was driving with the owner's permission as far as she knew, so she is a permitted driver under the friend's policy - but that insurer has denied coverage on the ground that the friend lacked authority to lend the car. If that denial stands, Claire's policy may respond. Under Ontario rules, the insurer of the vehicle ordinarily has the primary obligation, but where that insurer validly denies, the driver's own policy can be engaged.
- OPCF 27: this endorsement extends liability coverage to the insured when driving a non-owned auto. It would respond to the truck damage if the friend's policy does not.
- Borrowed car ($6,000): physical damage to a non-owned vehicle is not covered by OPCF 27, which addresses liability only. Collision coverage on Claire's policy applies to the insured vehicle, not to a borrowed car. The friend's own collision coverage would normally handle it - but that insurer has denied. Sophie and Claire may face a personal exposure here.
- Conclusion: liability for the truck is likely covered through OPCF 27 if the friend's insurer's denial is valid; the borrowed car's damage is likely uninsured.
2. How does Sophie's late reporting affect the claim, and what should Dan advise?
Read the worked answer
Late reporting is a condition issue, not an automatic bar.
- Prejudice test: insurers must generally show they were prejudiced by the delay. If the accident was otherwise documented and the truck's damage is clear, prejudice may be minimal.
- Dan's advice: report the claim to Claire's insurer immediately, in writing, with a full explanation of the delay. Do not minimize it.
- Cooperation: Sophie must cooperate fully with the investigation and provide a statement. Failure to cooperate can independently defeat coverage.
- Licence impact: a conviction or demerit points are matters for the provincial licensing regime, not the insurer. Dan should not speculate about suspension; he should refer Sophie to the licensing authority.
- Documentation: Dan should record the advice and confirm the report date in writing.
3. What rating and underwriting consequences should Dan flag to Claire?
Read the worked answer
Dan should prepare Claire for several effects.
- At-fault accident: Sophie's at-fault collision may increase the premium at renewal, depending on the insurer's rating rules and any accident-forgiveness feature.
- Occasional-driver status: if Sophie drives more than disclosed, the insurer may re-rate the policy. Claire should update the usage information.
- Deductible: the $1,000 collision deductible applies to covered physical damage; for the borrowed car, no collision coverage applies at all on Claire's policy.
- Future insurability: a young driver with an at-fault claim may face higher rates when she obtains her own policy. Dan should explain this so Claire can plan.
- Review: Dan should schedule a mid-term review to confirm the driver list and usage are accurate.