The Deed Recorded Friday, the Fire on Sunday
Marisol Ortega sold her rental duplex to Dev Patel. The deed was recorded at 3:10 p.m. on Friday, March 6, and escrow closed that afternoon. Ortega never cancelled her dwelling policy with Pacifica Mutual, which carried a $450,000 building limit and a $2,500 deductible. Patel bound his own coverage with Sierra Vista at 9:00 a.m. the same Friday. At 2:00 a.m. Sunday, March 8, a tenant's space heater started a fire that destroyed the building. The structure's replacement cost was $450,000; Patel had paid $430,000 for it. Ortega's public adjuster demands that Pacifica pay her the full $450,000 limit, arguing she "paid a full year of premium and never cancelled." Sierra Vista has reserved its rights pending an inspection. Each carrier has received the other's notice of the claim.
1. Which insured, if either, had an insurable interest in the building at 2:00 a.m. on March 8? Explain how that answer decides which policy responds.
Read the worked answer
Insurable interest in property is measured at the time of loss, not at the time the policy was written.
- Ortega: Title passed and the deed was recorded Friday afternoon. By 2:00 a.m. Sunday she owned no part of the building, so she would suffer no pecuniary loss from its destruction. Premium paid is irrelevant - indemnity follows loss, not consideration. Pacifica owes nothing for the structure. (A different answer would follow only if she retained a documented interest, e.g., an uncollected rent proration, a seller carryback deed of trust, or personal property still inside - and each of those must be specifically identified and valued.)
- Patel: He owned the building and bore the risk of its loss from 3:10 p.m. Friday. Sierra Vista responds, subject to its own terms and any inspection results.
Adjuster takeaway: the file should state the transfer time, the recording time, and the loss time, and be supported by the deed and escrow closing statement.
2. How should Pacifica's adjuster respond to Ortega's demand, and what must the claim file contain?
Read the worked answer
A written, reasoned denial - not silence and not a courtesy payment.
- Denial letter citing the specific policy language (insurable-interest/ownership provisions) and the factual basis: transfer of title at 3:10 p.m. on March 6, loss at 2:00 a.m. on March 8. A bare citation to "no insurable interest" with no facts is not defensible.
- Unearned premium. Because the exposure ended when title passed, the adjuster should quote a flat or pro rata cancellation effective March 6 and refund premium from that date. Refunding is not an admission of coverage - it corrects the record.
- File documentation: deed, closing statement, recorded date/time, fire department report, photographs, the demand letter and the response, and the reasoning trail.
- Watch for leftovers. Confirm whether Ortega had personal property at the risk (a DP-3 often covers landlord furnishings) and whether any rental income loss is claimed for a period she still owned the unit. Those are separate exposures and should be addressed explicitly rather than swept into the denial.
If the policy contains a change-of-ownership condition, note it as an alternative ground but do not rely on it alone - the interest analysis is the cleaner basis.
3. Sierra Vista's policy is a replacement-cost form with a $425,000 building limit and a $2,500 deductible. What is Patel's maximum recovery, and which principles limit it?
Read the worked answer
Indemnity caps the payment at the lesser of the loss, the insured's interest, and the limit.
- Replacement cost of the structure: $450,000.
- Patel's economic interest: he paid $430,000 - but indemnity for a total loss is measured by the value of the property, not the bargain price, so $430,000 does not by itself cap him.
- The policy limit of $425,000 is the binding ceiling.
Result: $425,000 less the $2,500 deductible = $422,500, assuming replacement actually occurs and the form's replacement-cost conditions are met. If Patel does not repair or replace, most forms settle at actual cash value (replacement cost less depreciation), which could be substantially lower.
Two further points the adjuster must resolve: (a) the mortgagee/lienholder, if any, is paid to the extent of its interest; and (b) recovery cannot exceed the limit even where replacement cost exceeds it - the insured, not the carrier, bears the shortfall. Document the valuation source and the repair-versus-ACV election in writing.