I85PREP
⌘ K
CA CLS Criminal Law study materials
CA CLS Criminal Law study resources

CA CLS Criminal Law practice questions

One question at a time. Build your CA CLS Criminal Law understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Criminal Law

Which mental state in California criminal law requires that the defendant actually know the nature of the act or the existence of the relevant facts?

  1. Recklessness
  2. Knowledge Correct answer.
  3. Criminal negligence
  4. Purpose

Explanation

Under California Penal Code section 7 and related case law, a person acts knowingly when aware of the nature of the conduct or that a circumstance exists. Knowledge is a distinct culpability level from purpose, which requires a conscious objective to achieve a result. Recklessness and negligence involve lesser degrees of awareness.

Question 2Criminal Law

A defendant intentionally fires a gun at a victim intending only to wound him, but the bullet strikes an artery and the victim dies. Which doctrine allows California to treat the killing as murder despite the lack of intent to kill?

  1. Transferred intent
  2. Felony-murder rule
  3. Deadly weapon doctrine Correct answer.
  4. Misdemeanor-manslaughter rule

Explanation

The deadly weapon doctrine permits an inference of intent to kill when a defendant intentionally uses a deadly weapon against a vital area of the body. Here the intent to kill is inferred from the deliberate shooting, supporting murder. It is not a transfer situation because the bullet hit the intended target.

Question 3Criminal Law

Under California law, which theory of first degree murder requires proof that the killing was willful, deliberate, and premeditated?

  1. Premeditated murder Correct answer.
  2. Second degree implied malice murder
  3. Provocative act murder
  4. Felony murder

Explanation

California Penal Code section 189 classifies as first degree murder a willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing. The deliberation and premeditation may be formed quickly, but the prosecution must prove them beyond a reasonable doubt. Felony murder is a separate route to first degree murder that does not require premeditation.

Question 4Criminal Law

A robber points a gun at a store clerk during a robbery, and the clerk suffers a fatal heart attack from fright. Which legal principle most directly supports a first degree murder charge against the robber?

  1. Merger doctrine
  2. Corpus delicti rule
  3. Felony-murder rule Correct answer.
  4. Year-and-a-day rule

Explanation

Robbery is one of the felonies enumerated in Penal Code section 189, and the felony-murder rule treats a death occurring during that felony as first degree murder. The rule applies even when the death is accidental or caused by fright rather than direct violence. The merger doctrine does not bar felony murder based on robbery because robbery is independent of the homicide.

Question 5Criminal Law

Which of the following is the correct definition of express malice under California murder law?

  1. A killing upon a sudden quarrel
  2. A killing during a felony
  3. An intent to kill Correct answer.
  4. A conscious disregard for human life

Explanation

Express malice exists when the defendant manifests a deliberate intention to unlawfully take away the life of another. Implied malice, by contrast, arises from a conscious disregard for human life. Sudden quarrel or heat of passion may reduce a killing to manslaughter.

Question 6Criminal Law

A defendant discovers his spouse in bed with another person and, in a sudden rage, kills the spouse. Which offense is most likely under California law?

  1. First degree murder
  2. Involuntary manslaughter
  3. Voluntary manslaughter Correct answer.
  4. Second degree murder

Explanation

A killing committed in a heat of passion upon adequate provocation negates malice and reduces the offense to voluntary manslaughter. The sudden discovery of a spouse's infidelity has traditionally been recognized as adequate provocation. The defendant must act before a cooling period elapses.

Question 7Criminal Law

What is the required mental state for involuntary manslaughter based on criminal negligence in California?

  1. Intent to kill
  2. Gross or criminal negligence Correct answer.
  3. Strict liability
  4. Conscious disregard of a high risk

Explanation

Involuntary manslaughter under Penal Code section 192(b) requires conduct amounting to gross or criminal negligence, meaning a high degree of negligence. The defendant need not intend to kill or consciously disregard a risk. Ordinary negligence is insufficient.

Question 8Criminal Law

Which of the following best describes the requirement for a valid claim of self-defense under California law?

  1. The defendant must have a reasonable belief in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury Correct answer.
  2. The defendant must be the initial aggressor
  3. The defendant must have suffered actual harm before using force
  4. The defendant must retreat whenever possible before using force

Explanation

Self-defense requires an honest and reasonable belief that the defendant is in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury. The force used must be necessary and proportionate to the threat. California follows the no-retreat rule when the defendant is in a place where he has a right to be.

Question 9Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with burglary. The prosecution proves the defendant entered a store intending to commit theft, then changed his mind before taking anything and left. What is the result?

  1. The defendant is not guilty because no theft occurred
  2. The defendant is guilty only of trespass
  3. The defendant is guilty only of attempted theft
  4. The defendant is guilty of burglary because intent was formed at entry Correct answer.

Explanation

Burglary requires entry into a structure with the intent to commit a felony or theft at the time of entry. The offense is complete upon entry with the requisite intent, even if the intended crime is abandoned. What happens after entry does not undo the burglary.

Question 10Criminal Law

Which element distinguishes robbery from theft under California law?

  1. The taking of property from the person or immediate presence of another by force or fear Correct answer.
  2. The absence of the owner's consent
  3. The use of a weapon
  4. The value of the property taken

Explanation

Robbery is theft accomplished by force or fear, and the property must be taken from the person or immediate presence of another. The force or fear element elevates the offense from theft to robbery. A weapon is not an essential element, though it may affect sentencing.

Question 11Criminal Law

A defendant obtains money from a victim by falsely claiming to be a charity collecting for disaster relief. Which offense is most appropriate under California law?

  1. Robbery
  2. Embezzlement
  3. Extortion
  4. Theft by false pretenses Correct answer.

Explanation

Theft by false pretenses occurs when a defendant knowingly makes a false representation of fact with intent to defraud and the victim relies on it to transfer title to property. Here the victim voluntarily parts with money based on the false charity claim. The victim transfers title, distinguishing it from embezzlement and larceny.

Question 12Criminal Law

Under California law, what is the essential difference between larceny and embezzlement?

  1. Whether the defendant had lawful possession of the property at the time of conversion Correct answer.
  2. Whether the property was taken from a building
  3. The value of the property taken
  4. Whether force was used

Explanation

Embezzlement involves the fraudulent conversion of property that the defendant lawfully possessed, while larceny involves a trespassory taking from another's possession. The key distinction is whether the defendant had lawful possession before the conversion. Force and location are relevant to other offenses, not this distinction.

Question 13Criminal Law

A defendant enters a home at night intending to assault the occupant but instead steals a television. Which offense is most clearly established?

  1. Burglary and theft Correct answer.
  2. Burglary only
  3. Robbery only
  4. Attempted assault only

Explanation

Burglary requires entry with intent to commit a felony or theft, and the defendant entered intending to commit assault, which qualifies. The actual taking of the television constitutes theft. Both offenses are established by the facts.

Question 14Criminal Law

Which of the following is required for a conviction of receiving stolen property in California?

  1. The defendant must have paid less than market value
  2. The defendant must have participated in the original theft
  3. The property must be worth more than a specified amount
  4. The property must have been received with knowledge that it was stolen Correct answer.

Explanation

Receiving stolen property requires that the property was stolen, that the defendant received or concealed it, and that the defendant knew it was stolen. The defendant need not have participated in the theft. The value of the property and the price paid are not essential elements.

Question 15Criminal Law

A defendant threatens to reveal embarrassing information about a victim unless the victim pays money. Which offense does this conduct most likely constitute under California law?

  1. Robbery
  2. Extortion Correct answer.
  3. Burglary
  4. Forgery

Explanation

Extortion is the obtaining of property from another with consent induced by a wrongful use of force or fear, including threats to expose embarrassing information. The victim's consent is obtained through the threat, distinguishing extortion from robbery. Robbery requires force or fear that overcomes resistance in a taking from the person.

Question 16Criminal Law

What mental state is required for the crime of assault under California law?

  1. Reckless disregard for property
  2. Specific intent to commit a battery or cause injury Correct answer.
  3. Criminal negligence
  4. Strict liability

Explanation

California assault is a general intent crime that nonetheless requires an intentional act and knowledge of facts that would lead a reasonable person to realize the act would directly and probably result in the application of force. Courts often describe it as requiring an intent to commit a battery. Mere negligence is insufficient.

Question 17Criminal Law

A defendant swings a fist at a victim but misses. Which offense has the defendant committed under California law?

  1. Attempted murder
  2. Assault Correct answer.
  3. Battery
  4. Mayhem

Explanation

Assault is an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on another. A missed punch establishes the attempt and present ability without actual contact. Battery requires actual harmful or offensive contact.

Question 18Criminal Law

Which of the following is an essential element of battery under California law?

  1. Use of a deadly weapon
  2. Taking of property
  3. Intent to kill
  4. Actual harmful or offensive contact Correct answer.

Explanation

Battery requires the willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon another, which means actual harmful or offensive contact. The defendant need not intend to injure; intent to commit the act suffices. A deadly weapon and intent to kill are not elements.

Question 19Criminal Law

A defendant, intending to kill one person, instead kills a bystander. Which doctrine applies in California?

  1. Transferred intent Correct answer.
  2. Necessity
  3. Entrapment
  4. Merger doctrine

Explanation

Under transferred intent, the intent to kill the intended victim transfers to the actual victim, so the defendant is liable for murder of the bystander. The doctrine prevents a defendant from escaping liability because of a mistake in aim. The defendant's mental state is treated as if directed at the person actually harmed.

Question 20Criminal Law

Which of the following is required to establish the defense of duress in California?

  1. The threat must involve only property damage
  2. The defendant must have acted with premeditation
  3. The threat must be of immediate death or great bodily injury to the defendant or another Correct answer.
  4. The defendant must have initiated the threat

Explanation

Duress requires a threat of immediate death or great bodily injury to the defendant or another person, and the defendant must have acted under that threat. The threat must be such that a reasonable person would be unable to resist. Duress is not a defense to intentional murder under California law.

Question 21Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with murder and claims he was so intoxicated that he could not form the intent to kill. Which statement is correct under California law?

  1. Involuntary intoxication is irrelevant to criminal liability
  2. Voluntary intoxication may negate malice and reduce murder to manslaughter Correct answer.
  3. Voluntary intoxication is a complete defense to all crimes
  4. Voluntary intoxication may negate specific intent but not general intent

Explanation

Under California law, evidence of voluntary intoxication may be considered in determining whether the defendant actually formed the specific intent required for certain offenses, including malice aforethought. If it negates malice, the offense may be reduced from murder to manslaughter. Voluntary intoxication does not negate general intent.

Question 22Criminal Law

What is the effect of the insanity defense under California's M'Naghten test?

  1. The defendant is convicted but receives probation
  2. The defendant is released without any legal consequences
  3. The defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity and committed to a state hospital Correct answer.
  4. The defendant is found guilty of a lesser offense

Explanation

California applies a version of the M'Naghten test, which asks whether the defendant, because of a mental disease or defect, could not know the nature and quality of the act or could not distinguish right from wrong. A successful insanity defense results in a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, followed by commitment to a state hospital. The defendant is not simply released.

Question 23Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with possessing illegal drugs. The police found the drugs during a search of the defendant's car without a warrant. Which constitutional provision is most directly implicated?

  1. Fourth Amendment Correct answer.
  2. Eighth Amendment
  3. First Amendment
  4. Fifth Amendment

Explanation

The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and warrantless searches are generally unreasonable unless an exception applies. Evidence obtained in violation may be suppressed under the exclusionary rule. The other amendments address speech, self-incrimination, and cruel and unusual punishment.

Question 24Criminal Law

Which of the following is true regarding the corpus delicti rule in California?

  1. It requires the defendant's confession to be corroborated by independent evidence that a crime occurred Correct answer.
  2. It bars the use of circumstantial evidence
  3. It applies only to property crimes
  4. It requires the prosecution to produce the victim's body

Explanation

The corpus delicti rule requires that the prosecution establish that a crime occurred through evidence independent of the defendant's own statements. A confession alone cannot establish the corpus delicti. Circumstantial evidence may satisfy the rule.

Question 25Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with grand theft. Which factor most commonly elevates theft to grand theft under California law?

  1. The theft occurred at night
  2. The property value exceeds the statutory threshold Correct answer.
  3. The victim was a corporation
  4. The defendant used a disguise

Explanation

Grand theft generally requires that the property taken exceed a statutory value threshold, with certain property types treated specially. The time of day, identity of the victim, and use of a disguise do not by themselves elevate theft to grand theft. The distinction is primarily based on value and property type.

Question 26Criminal Law

Under California law, which of the following is required for a valid claim of imperfect self-defense reducing murder to manslaughter?

  1. The defendant's belief was reasonable but the force used was excessive
  2. The defendant provoked the victim into attacking first
  3. The defendant retreated as far as possible before using force
  4. The defendant actually but unreasonably believed in the need to use deadly force Correct answer.

Explanation

Imperfect self-defense applies when a defendant actually holds an honest but unreasonable belief that deadly force is necessary to defend against imminent peril. Because the belief is unreasonable, the doctrine negates malice and reduces murder to voluntary manslaughter rather than fully excusing the killing.

Question 27Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with first degree murder under a premeditation and deliberation theory. Which factor most strongly supports a finding of premeditation?

  1. The defendant was intoxicated at the time of the killing
  2. The defendant used a single blow with his hands
  3. The defendant planned the killing over several days and arranged an alibi Correct answer.
  4. The defendant acted on a sudden impulse after a brief argument

Explanation

Premeditation requires evidence of planning, motive, or a manner of killing showing deliberate intent before acting. Evidence that the defendant planned over time and arranged an alibi is classic proof of deliberation and premeditation.

Question 28Criminal Law

Which of the following best states the felony murder rule under California law?

  1. A death during the commission of certain inherently dangerous felonies is murder, with malice implied from the felony Correct answer.
  2. Felony murder requires proof that the defendant intended to kill the victim
  3. Any death occurring during any felony is automatically first degree murder
  4. Felony murder applies only when the defendant personally caused the death

Explanation

California's felony murder rule treats certain inherently dangerous felonies, such as robbery and burglary, as supporting an implied malice murder charge when a death occurs during the felony. The rule does not require an intent to kill, but it is limited to enumerated or inherently dangerous felonies.

Question 29Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with arson under California law. Which element is required?

  1. The fire must have caused more than a specified dollar amount of damage
  2. The defendant must have intended to injure a person
  3. The structure burned must be a residence
  4. The defendant must have willfully and maliciously set fire to a structure, forest land, or property Correct answer.

Explanation

California arson requires that the defendant willfully and maliciously set fire to a structure, forest land, or property. The offense does not require that the burned structure be a dwelling or that a person be injured.

Question 30Criminal Law

A defendant takes a victim's wallet by force, and the victim is slightly injured when the defendant pushes her to the ground. Which offense is most appropriate under California law?

  1. Robbery Correct answer.
  2. Burglary
  3. Petty theft
  4. Receiving stolen property

Explanation

Robbery requires the taking of personal property from another's person or immediate presence, by force or fear, with intent to permanently deprive. Pushing the victim down and taking the wallet satisfies the force element and the taking element.

Question 31Criminal Law

Which of the following is required to establish the defense of necessity in California?

  1. The defendant acted under a threat of immediate death from another person
  2. The defendant acted to avoid a threat that was greater than the harm caused by the crime Correct answer.
  3. The defendant's belief in the threat was reasonable, even if the threat was not imminent
  4. The defendant had no alternative but to commit a violent felony

Explanation

The necessity defense requires that the defendant faced a threat of imminent harm and that the harm avoided was greater than the harm caused by the criminal act. The defense is not available when the defendant caused the danger or when a legal alternative existed.

Question 32Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with kidnapping under California law. Which fact is most important to distinguish kidnapping from false imprisonment?

  1. The victim was a minor at the time of the offense
  2. The victim was moved a substantial distance or confined in a way that increases the risk of harm Correct answer.
  3. The victim was held for more than one hour
  4. The defendant demanded money from the victim's family

Explanation

Kidnapping requires movement of the victim by a substantial distance or confinement that substantially increases the risk of harm beyond that inherent in the underlying crime. False imprisonment involves confinement without the asportation element that elevates the offense to kidnapping.

Question 33Criminal Law

Under California law, which of the following is required for a conviction of criminal threats?

  1. The threat must be made in the victim's presence
  2. The victim must actually be physically injured
  3. The threat must be conveyed to the victim and cause sustained fear Correct answer.
  4. The threat must be made in writing

Explanation

Criminal threats require a threat of death or great bodily injury, conveyed to the victim, that causes the victim to be in sustained fear for his or her safety. The statute does not require physical injury or a writing.

Question 34Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with embezzlement. Which fact is most consistent with that offense rather than larceny?

  1. The defendant broke into a warehouse intending to steal
  2. The defendant used force to take a purse from a pedestrian
  3. The defendant was entrusted with an employer's funds and converted them to personal use Correct answer.
  4. The defendant took property from a store shelf without paying

Explanation

Embezzlement occurs when a person who lawfully possesses property by virtue of a trust or fiduciary relationship fraudulently converts it to personal use. The key distinction from larceny is that the property was lawfully entrusted to the defendant before the conversion.

Question 35Criminal Law

Which of the following is required for a conviction of forgery under California law?

  1. The defendant must have obtained money as a result of the forged document
  2. The defendant must have signed another person's name with intent to defraud Correct answer.
  3. The defendant must have altered a public record
  4. The defendant must have used a computer to create the document

Explanation

Forgery requires the signing of another person's name or the alteration of a document with intent to defraud. The offense is complete upon the act with fraudulent intent, even if no money is obtained.

Question 36Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with driving under the influence. Which of the following is true regarding the offense under California law?

  1. The defendant can be convicted based on evidence of impaired driving even without a chemical test Correct answer.
  2. The defendant must have caused an accident to be convicted
  3. The prosecution must prove the defendant's blood alcohol level was above the legal limit to prove impaired driving
  4. The defendant must have been driving a commercial vehicle

Explanation

California recognizes both a per se theory based on blood alcohol level and an impaired driving theory based on observable signs of intoxication. A conviction can rest on evidence of impaired driving even without a chemical test result.

Question 37Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with possession of a controlled substance. Which mental state is required for the offense under California law?

  1. The defendant must have known the exact chemical name of the substance
  2. The defendant must have intended to sell the substance
  3. The defendant must know of the substance's presence and its nature as a controlled substance Correct answer.
  4. The defendant must have used the substance before arrest

Explanation

Possession offenses require that the defendant knowingly possess the substance and be aware of its nature as a controlled substance. The defendant need not know the precise chemical name or intend to sell it.

Question 38Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with first degree burglary. Which fact is most important to elevate the offense from second degree to first degree?

  1. The structure entered was a commercial building
  2. The defendant entered during the daytime
  3. The structure entered was an inhabited dwelling house Correct answer.
  4. The defendant was unarmed

Explanation

First degree burglary under California law requires entry into an inhabited dwelling house, a floating home, or certain inhabited vessels. Entry into commercial buildings or other structures generally constitutes second degree burglary.

Question 39Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with robbery of a bank. Which of the following is an essential element of robbery?

  1. The property taken must exceed a threshold value
  2. The taking must be accomplished by force or fear Correct answer.
  3. The victim must be a financial institution
  4. The defendant must have used a weapon

Explanation

Robbery requires a taking of personal property from another's person or immediate presence by means of force or fear. The value of the property is irrelevant, and a weapon is not required for simple robbery.

Question 40Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with murder and claims he acted in the heat of passion after discovering his partner's infidelity. Which standard determines whether the provocation is sufficient?

  1. Whether the provocation occurred within one hour of the killing
  2. Whether the victim intended to provoke the defendant
  3. Whether the provocation would cause an ordinary person of average disposition to act rashly without deliberation Correct answer.
  4. Whether the defendant subjectively felt angry at the time of the killing

Explanation

Heat of passion requires provocation that would cause an ordinary person of average disposition to act rashly and without deliberation. The defendant must also actually have been provoked and acted before a cooling-off period.

Question 41Criminal Law

Under California law, which of the following best describes the doctrine of transferred intent?

  1. The defendant's intent transfers to an accomplice who completes the crime
  2. The defendant's intent transfers to a later crime committed by another person
  3. The defendant's intent transfers from a misdemeanor to a felony
  4. The defendant's intent to harm one person transfers to the actual victim if the defendant mistakenly harms another Correct answer.

Explanation

Transferred intent applies when a defendant intends to harm one person but instead harms another; the intent is transferred to the actual victim. This allows the defendant to be liable for the harm caused as if it had been intended.

Question 42Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with assault with a deadly weapon. Which of the following is required under California law?

  1. The defendant must have used a firearm
  2. The defendant must have actually touched the victim with the weapon
  3. The defendant must have had the present ability to commit a violent injury and intended to commit a battery Correct answer.
  4. The defendant must have caused serious bodily injury

Explanation

Assault with a deadly weapon requires an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on another, with the intent to commit a battery. Physical contact is not required, and serious injury need not result.

Question 43Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with child endangerment under California law. Which of the following best describes the required mens rea?

  1. The defendant must have acted with malice aforethought
  2. The defendant must have known the child would die
  3. The defendant must have acted with criminal negligence or willfully caused the child to suffer harm Correct answer.
  4. The defendant must have intended to harm the child

Explanation

Child endangerment may be committed by willfully causing a child to suffer harm or by criminal negligence in permitting the child to be placed in a situation endangering health or safety. Intent to harm is not required.

Question 44Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with perjury. Which of the following is required under California law?

  1. The false statement must have been made under oath in a proceeding where an oath is authorized by law Correct answer.
  2. The false statement must have been made in writing
  3. The false statement must have been material to a criminal case only
  4. The false statement must have been made to a police officer

Explanation

Perjury requires a willful false statement of material matter made under oath in a proceeding where an oath is authorized by law. The statement need not be written, and it can occur in civil as well as criminal proceedings.

Question 45Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with grand theft of an automobile. Which theory most directly supports the charge under California law?

  1. The defendant had previously borrowed the vehicle
  2. The vehicle was taken from a garage
  3. The vehicle's value exceeded the grand theft threshold Correct answer.
  4. The vehicle was taken from a parking lot without force

Explanation

Grand theft generally requires that the property taken exceed the statutory value threshold or fall within a category designated as grand theft, such as certain vehicles. Value above the threshold is the classic basis for elevating theft.

Question 46Criminal Law

Under California law, which of the following is true regarding the defense of entrapment?

  1. Entrapment occurs when police induce a person to commit a crime he was not predisposed to commit Correct answer.
  2. Entrapment occurs when police merely provide an opportunity to commit a crime
  3. Entrapment applies only to drug offenses
  4. Entrapment requires proof that the defendant had no prior criminal record

Explanation

California follows the subjective test for entrapment, focusing on whether the police induced the defendant to commit a crime he was not predisposed to commit. Merely providing an opportunity to commit a crime is not entrapment.

Question 47Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with murder and claims he was acting under a delusion that the victim was attacking him. Which defense is most directly implicated?

  1. Voluntary intoxication
  2. Diminished capacity
  3. Insanity under the M'Naghten test Correct answer.
  4. Mistake of fact

Explanation

A delusion that the victim was attacking him bears on whether the defendant knew the nature of his act or understood its wrongfulness, which is the M'Naghten insanity standard. California applies M'Naghten, and a delusion may support the defense if it negates that knowledge.

Question 48Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with conspiracy to commit robbery. Which of the following is required under California law?

  1. An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime Correct answer.
  2. An overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy
  3. The defendant must have received a financial benefit
  4. The defendant must have personally committed the robbery

Explanation

Conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime, along with the requisite intent. In California, an overt act is required for most conspiracies, but the agreement is the core element.

Question 49Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with aiding and abetting a burglary. Which of the following is required under California law?

  1. The defendant must have received a share of the stolen property
  2. The defendant must have been present at the scene
  3. The defendant must have personally entered the structure
  4. The defendant must have known of the perpetrator's unlawful purpose and intended to facilitate it Correct answer.

Explanation

Aiding and abetting requires that the defendant know of the perpetrator's unlawful purpose and intend to facilitate or encourage the commission of the crime. Presence and receipt of proceeds are not required.

Question 50Criminal Law

A defendant is charged with torture under California law. Which of the following is required?

  1. The defendant must have killed the victim
  2. The defendant must have intended to cause cruel or extreme pain and suffering for revenge, extortion, persuasion, or another sadistic purpose Correct answer.
  3. The defendant must have acted with premeditation
  4. The defendant must have used a weapon

Explanation

Torture requires the intent to cause cruel or extreme pain and suffering for purposes such as revenge, extortion, persuasion, or a sadistic purpose. The victim need not die, and a weapon is not required.