CA Immigration Specialist study materials
CA Immigration Specialist study resources

The Three-Year Gap and the Missing Tax Returns

CA Immigration Specialist · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Three-Year Gap and the Missing Tax Returns

A lawful permanent resident (LPR) since 2016 files an I-130 for his 24-year-old unmarried daughter in the F2B category. The priority date is current under the Dates for Filing chart but not the Final Action chart. The daughter entered the U.S. on a B-2 in 2019 and has remained. She has never worked without authorization. The petitioner's most recent three tax returns show income of $18,400, $21,000, and $19,700 for a household of four; the poverty guideline for a household of four is $31,200. He owns a rental property worth $210,000 with a $90,000 mortgage. The daughter's mother, a U.S. citizen, is willing to co-sponsor but has been self-employed for only one year and has no prior return. The petitioner asks whether he can file the I-864 now and whether the daughter may file the I-485 concurrently.

1. May the daughter file the I-485 now? Analyze the visa availability question and any bars to adjustment she faces.

Read the worked answer

Visa availability. Adjustment requires an immigrant visa to be immediately available at the time of filing. USCIS honors the Dates for Filing chart only when the agency has announced it will do so for that fiscal year and only for the relevant preference category. If the Final Action chart is not current for F2B, the I-485 cannot be accepted unless USCIS's published filing chart for that month permits it. Counsel must check the specific Visa Bulletin month covering the filing date - not assume the more favorable chart governs.

Statutory bar. Under INA §245(c), an alien who has failed to maintain lawful status or who has engaged in unauthorized employment is ineligible to adjust, with narrow exceptions (immediate relatives, VAWA self-petitioners, certain §245(i) beneficiaries). The daughter overstayed her B-2. She is an F2B preference derivative, not an immediate relative, so the §245(c) bar applies. Her lack of unauthorized employment does not cure the status violation.

Conclusion. She cannot adjust in the U.S. absent a §245(i) grandfathering claim. Consular processing abroad would trigger a multi-year bar under INA §212(a)(9)(B) for unlawful presence over one year, requiring an I-601A provisional waiver - but the I-601A is unavailable to preference applicants in the F2B category unless the qualifying relative hardship is established, and the waiver is limited to immediate relatives and certain preference categories. Counsel should evaluate whether she departed before accruing one year of unlawful presence and confirm the exact accrual dates.

2. Evaluate the affidavit of support problem and whether the co-sponsor solves it.

Read the worked answer

Petitioner's I-864. The I-864 requires income at or above 125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for the household size. For a household of four, that figure is $31,200. The petitioner's three-year average is roughly $19,700 - about 63% of the threshold. He may use assets to supplement, but only assets convertible to cash within one year and located in the U.S., valued at five times the difference between his income and the threshold. The gap is about $11,500; five times that is $57,500. His net equity in the rental is $120,000 ($210,000 minus $90,000 mortgage), which exceeds the asset requirement - but USCIS requires evidence of ownership, appraisal, and that the asset can be liquidated. If the property is his principal residence or the sole source of family income, it may not qualify.

Co-sponsor. A joint sponsor must independently meet the 125% threshold based on the sponsor's own household size (which includes the sponsor's dependents plus the intending immigrant). Self-employment income requires the most recent federal tax return plus a current year statement; a sponsor with only one year of self-employment and no prior return is weak evidence under the I-864 instructions and the public charge framework. The joint sponsor's household size must be calculated correctly - if she claims the daughter as a household member, she must prove the daughter is in her household or that they have resided together.

Practical answer. The I-864 can be filed now with the petitioner's return plus asset documentation, but a joint sponsor with only one year of self-employment will likely draw a Request for Evidence. Better practice: obtain a second joint sponsor with two or three years of stable W-2 income, or wait until the co-sponsor files a second return.