The Blended Family and the Irrevocable Trust
George, 68, is remarried to Linda, 61. He has two children from his first marriage, ages 41 and 38, and Linda has one child, 34. George's estate is $4.6 million: a $1.8 million house titled jointly with Linda with right of survivorship, $1.2 million in an IRA naming Linda as primary beneficiary, $1.1 million in a brokerage account, and $500,000 in a revocable trust he created five years ago that names his two children as remainder beneficiaries. Linda's estate is $700,000. George wants Linda to remain in the house for life, then have it pass to his children. He also wants to minimize estate taxes and 'keep it fair' among the three children.
1. Identify the conflicts between George's stated goals and the current titling and beneficiary designations.
Read the worked answer
The documents and the goals are in direct conflict:
- House: titled jointly with right of survivorship, the house passes automatically to Linda and is not controlled by the revocable trust. George's wish that it pass to his children after Linda's life estate is not documented. On Linda's death, the house would pass under her estate plan - potentially to her child - defeating George's intent.
- IRA: naming Linda as primary beneficiary gives her outright ownership. She can spend it, and at her death any remainder passes under her will. If George wants a life-income arrangement for Linda with remainder to his children, a see-through trust or a charitable remainder trust may be appropriate, but naming a trust requires careful drafting to preserve stretch treatment.
- Revocable trust: naming only his two children as remainder beneficiaries conflicts with 'keep it fair' among three children, and it does not control the jointly held house or the IRA.
- Portability and marital deduction: as a married couple, unlimited marital deduction is available, but George's $4.6 million is below the federal exclusion for a single person, so federal estate tax may not be the real issue - state estate tax and future growth may be. Linda's smaller estate suggests she may not need the marital deduction to avoid tax.
Recommend retitling the house into the trust with a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) election or a life-estate deed, and reviewing beneficiary designations.
2. How would you reconcile 'keep it fair' with George's desire to provide for Linda, and what planning techniques would you recommend?
Read the worked answer
'Fair' is ambiguous: equal shares to the three children is not the same as providing for Linda first. George should define fairness explicitly - for example, Linda receives income and residence rights for life, with the remainder divided equally among all three children, or the remainder split two-thirds to his children and one-third to Linda's child.
Techniques:
- QTIP trust: fund a trust for Linda that pays her all income for life, with George choosing the remainder beneficiaries. This provides for Linda, qualifies for the marital deduction, and keeps control of the ultimate disposition. A QTIP election also preserves portability of George's unused exclusion if elected on a timely filed estate tax return.
- Life estate in the residence: a qualified personal residence trust or a trust granting Linda the right to occupy the house for life, with the house passing to his children at her death or remarriage. Consider whether the trust should pay taxes, insurance, and repairs.
- IRA planning: if Linda needs income, name her outright; if George wants remainder control, name a see-through trust for her benefit with the children as remainder beneficiaries, accepting the loss of spousal stretch and the trust's annual distribution requirements. Coordinate with the attorney on the 10-year rule for non-spouse beneficiaries.
- Equalization: use life insurance on George's life, owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust, to provide liquidity and equalize inheritances among the three children without disinheriting anyone.
- Communication: hold a family meeting and document the intent in a letter of instruction.
Recommend a coordinated review with an estate attorney and CPA, and a funding checklist to confirm retitling.