Canada IMDG Marine DG study plan
Canada IMDG Marine DG · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
IMDG Code structure, scope, and legal framework (SOLAS Chapter VII, MARPOL Annex III, Canadian TDG Act and Regulations) & Classification of dangerous goods: hazard classes, divisions, packing groups, and subsidiary risks
Map the IMDG Code volumes, supplements, and chapter sequence, and state the scope of each in your own words
Trace how SOLAS Chapter VII, MARPOL Annex III, and the Canadian TDG Act and Regulations interlock for a marine shipment, listing which instrument governs which obligation
Define all nine hazard classes and their divisions from memory, including the three packing groups and their assignment criteria
Distinguish primary from subsidiary risk and explain when a subsidiary risk label is required
Identify the Canadian competent authority touchpoints for classification and transport of dangerous goods by sea
Your checkpoint
A one-page comparison table listing each legal instrument, its scope, and one worked example shipment showing which rules apply at each stage
Classification of dangerous goods: hazard classes, divisions, packing groups, and subsidiary risks & Dangerous Goods List, special provisions, and limited/except quantities
Assign class, division, and packing group to ten representative substances using classification criteria alone, without the Dangerous Goods List
Explain the precedence of hazard rules and apply them to at least three multi-hazard substances
Navigate the Dangerous Goods List columns in order and state what each column controls
Interpret at least eight special provisions and describe how each changes packing, marking, or stowage
Determine whether five sample consignments qualify for limited quantity or excepted quantity relief, and state the resulting marking and documentation consequences
Your checkpoint
A worked classification and Dangerous Goods List lookup sheet for ten substances, each with class, packing group, special provisions cited, and limited/excepted quantity eligibility
Packaging, IBCs, large packagings, tanks, and portable tanks: selection, construction, testing, and use & Marking, labelling, and placarding of packages and transport units
Select the correct UN packaging code for eight consignments by cross-referencing packing instructions and packing group performance levels
Explain the X, Y, Z performance marking on packaging and what each letter certifies
Differentiate packaging, IBCs, large packagings, portable tanks, and road tank vehicles by construction, testing, and use limits
Apply marking and labelling requirements to packages, including UN number, proper shipping name, and orientation arrows
Determine placarding and marking requirements for a freight container and a road vehicle carrying multiple dangerous goods
Your checkpoint
A packaging selection and marking/labelling plan for eight consignments, showing the UN code chosen, the packing instruction relied on, and every mark and label applied
Documentation: multimodal dangerous goods transport document, container/vehicle packing certificate, and electronic data interchange & Safe handling, loading, unloading, and personnel training requirements
Draft a complete multimodal dangerous goods transport document for a multi-line consignment, including all mandatory and supplementary entries
Complete a container or vehicle packing certificate and identify who may sign it and what they certify
List the common documentation defects that cause a shipment to be rejected at a marine terminal
Describe the EDI message content requirements and how electronic documentation satisfies the transport document obligation
Outline the training categories, competency expectations, and record-keeping duties for shore and shipboard personnel
Your checkpoint
A full document set for one multi-line consignment: transport document, packing certificate, and a defect checklist used to self-audit it
Stowage, segregation, and securing of dangerous goods on board ships & Transport security provisions and security awareness
Apply the segregation table to determine segregation for at least ten pairs of dangerous goods, including the role of the segregation groups
Explain the difference between away from, separated from, and separated by a complete compartment or hold, and give a stowage example of each
Determine on-deck versus under-deck stowage restrictions for a set of substances and justify each choice
Describe securing requirements for cargo transport units and the risks of poor securing at sea
Summarize the transport security provisions, including the security plan elements and the role of security awareness training
Your checkpoint
A stowage and segregation plan for a mixed cargo on a defined vessel layout, with a written justification for each segregation decision and a one-page security checklist
Emergency response, fire precautions, spill control, and the EmS and MFAG guides & Packaging, IBCs, large packagings, tanks, and portable tanks: selection, construction, testing, and use
Match the correct EmS schedule to ten substances and describe the fire and spill response actions each schedule prescribes
Use the MFAG to determine initial treatment guidance for five exposure scenarios
Explain the purpose and limits of the dangerous goods incident reporting obligations and the emergency response information required on board
Identify the testing, inspection, and periodic re-test requirements for portable tanks and IBCs
Explain the conditions for filling, use, and repair of packagings and tanks and the duties of the person responsible for packing
Your checkpoint
An emergency response card set for ten substances, each with EmS schedule, MFAG guide reference, and the first three response actions
Dangerous Goods List, special provisions, and limited/except quantities & Stowage, segregation, and securing of dangerous goods on board ships
Re-run classification and Dangerous Goods List lookups for twenty substances under timed conditions with at least 90 percent accuracy
Resolve five special provision scenarios that alter stowage or segregation outcomes
Combine segregation, stowage, and securing rules to plan a complex multi-class container load
Identify the documentation and marking errors most likely to arise in limited quantity marine shipments
Explain how the Canadian TDG Regulations interact with IMDG requirements when a shipment moves by road to a marine terminal
Your checkpoint
A timed 20-item lookup and segregation exercise scored against the Code, with every error annotated and corrected
IMDG Code structure, scope, and legal framework (SOLAS Chapter VII, MARPOL Annex III, Canadian TDG Act and Regulations) & Classification of dangerous goods: hazard classes, divisions, packing groups, and subsidiary risks & Documentation: multimodal dangerous goods transport document, container/vehicle packing certificate, and electronic data interchange & Emergency response, fire precautions, spill control, and the EmS and MFAG guides
Synthesize the legal framework, classification, documentation, and emergency response domains into a single end-to-end shipment walkthrough
Complete a full-length practice examination under time pressure and score it by domain
Review every missed item by tracing it back to the governing Code section or regulation
Recite from memory the mandatory transport document entries and packing certificate contents
State the emergency response sequence for a spill and a fire on board, citing the relevant EmS and MFAG guidance
Your checkpoint
A scored full-length practice examination with a written remediation log listing each weak domain and the specific Code sections to re-read
Milestones
Week 2: Score at least 80 percent on a self-made 20-question classification and Dangerous Goods List quiz without consulting the Code
Week 4: Produce a complete, defect-free document set for a multi-line consignment that passes your own checklist with zero findings
Week 6: Correctly match EmS schedules and MFAG guides for at least 8 of 10 substances and explain each response action
Week 8: Achieve at least 85 percent overall on the full-length practice examination with no domain below 70 percent