LLQP Accident & Sickness study materials
LLQP Accident & Sickness study resources

Long-Term Care and the Family Pressure

LLQP Accident & Sickness · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Long-Term Care and the Family Pressure

Derek, 72, is considering a long-term care policy with a $4,500 monthly benefit, a 90-day elimination period, and a three-year benefit period. He has $320,000 in savings, a $1,900 monthly pension, and a home worth $600,000 with no mortgage. His adult daughter, who holds his power of attorney for property, wants him to buy the policy and name her as the irrevocable beneficiary "so the money stays in the family." Derek has mild cognitive impairment, though his physician says he can still understand financial decisions. The premium is $6,800 annually. Derek's daughter has a history of unpaid debts.

1. Evaluate the suitability of this policy for Derek, including the beneficiary request.

Read the worked answer

Suitability factors:

  • Need: Derek has substantial savings and home equity, so he could self-fund some care. But at $4,500 monthly, three years of care would cost about $162,000, roughly half his savings. A policy offers real protection against erosion of assets.
  • Affordability: $6,800 annually against a $1,900 pension plus savings is manageable but not trivial. He should confirm the premium is sustainable for life.
  • Cognitive capacity: Mild impairment plus a physician's opinion supports capacity, but the broker should document the conversation carefully and consider involving an independent third party.

The beneficiary request is a red flag.

  1. Irrevocable beneficiary means Derek cannot change it without consent. That is a serious loss of control for someone who may later need flexibility.
  2. LTC benefits are generally paid to the insured, not to a named beneficiary, because they reimburse care costs. Naming the daughter may be meaningless or may create a conflict.
  3. Undue influence: The daughter's debts and her role as attorney create a motive to divert funds. The broker must ensure the request reflects Derek's wishes, not hers.

Recommendation: Decline to structure the policy as requested without independent confirmation of Derek's intent, and suggest a revocable designation or no designation at all.

2. What steps should the broker take to protect Derek and satisfy professional obligations?

Read the worked answer

A documented, independent process:

  1. Meet Derek alone at least once to confirm his wishes without the daughter present.
  2. Document capacity - note the physician's opinion, the questions asked, and Derek's answers.
  3. Explain the irrevocable designation in plain terms, including that he cannot change it without her consent.
  4. Consider a capacity assessment or independent legal advice if there is any doubt.
  5. Do not accept instructions from the attorney that benefit the attorney personally without confirming they reflect the donor's wishes and are permitted by the power of attorney.
  6. Record everything in the file, including any pressure observed.

If concerns persist: The broker may decline to proceed, refer the matter to a manager or compliance, and, where financial abuse is suspected, follow the firm's escalation policy, which may include reporting to adult protective services.

The exam-tested principle: the broker serves the client, not the family, and a power of attorney does not suspend the duty to confirm the donor's genuine intent.