Two Reviews of One Bakery
An online listing shows two reviews of the same bakery. Review A: "Waited 25 minutes for a croissant that was fine. The staff were pleasant but clearly overwhelmed; only two people were working a Saturday rush. I'll return when they staff up." Review B: "Twenty-five minutes! Unacceptable. Two staff on a Saturday is a management failure, and pleasant smiles don't fix a stale pastry case. Skip this place until they get serious." Both reviews mention the same wait time, the same two staff, and the same Saturday crowd.
1. Compare the tone and attitude of the two reviewers toward the bakery's staff.
Read the worked answer
Review A is measured and sympathetic: staff are "pleasant but clearly overwhelmed," and blame lands softly on understaffing. Review B is harsh and sarcastic; "pleasant smiles don't fix" dismisses the staff's effort and shifts blame to management as a "failure." Same facts, opposite attitudes, so tone must be read from word choice, not content.
2. Both reviewers recommend avoiding the bakery, but their purposes differ. Explain the difference.
Read the worked answer
Review A aims to inform and to return later; it explains a fixable condition (staffing up). Review B aims to warn and pressure, using the wait as evidence of a deeper problem. One is a conditional pause, the other a verdict. Recognizing purpose prevents treating identical recommendations as identical messages.