NCA Torts flashcards
NCA Torts · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Duty of care test
- A duty arises where harm is reasonably foreseeable, there is proximity between the parties, and it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty.
- Reasonable person standard
- The defendant is judged against an ordinary competent person exercising the same activity, not against their own subjective skill or best efforts.
- Res ipsa loquitur
- The thing causing harm was under the defendant's exclusive control and the accident would not ordinarily occur without negligence, permitting an inference of breach.
- Professional standard of care
- A professional must act as an ordinary skilled member of their profession would; a practice accepted by a responsible body of opinion is generally not negligent.
- But for test
- Factual causation is established where, but for the defendant's breach, the claimant's harm would not have occurred on the balance of probabilities.
- Material contribution
- Where harm is cumulative and indivisible, a defendant who materially contributed to the risk of harm may be liable even without proof of individual causation.
- Novus actus interveniens
- A free, deliberate and informed intervening act breaks the chain of causation, relieving the original wrongdoer of liability for subsequent harm.
- Joint and several liability
- Where several tortfeasors cause indivisible harm, each is liable for the full amount, subject to the claimant not recovering more than once.
- Remoteness of damage
- A defendant is liable only for damage of a kind reasonably foreseeable at the time of breach; the precise manner or extent need not be foreseeable.
- Thin skull rule
- The defendant takes the victim as found, so unforeseeable exacerbation of a foreseeable injury remains compensable in full.
- Contributory negligence
- A partial defence reducing damages to reflect the claimant's own fault in contributing to the harm, often expressed as a percentage reduction.
- Volenti non fit injuria
- A complete defence where the claimant, with knowledge of the risk, freely and voluntarily accepted it, thereby consenting to the harm.
- Special relationship
- A relationship of proximity and reliance between adviser and advisee that gives rise to a duty of care for negligent statements causing economic loss.
- Pure economic loss
- Financial loss not consequent on physical damage to the claimant's person or property; generally not recoverable in negligence absent a special relationship.
- Assumption of responsibility
- A defendant who undertakes to advise or act for the claimant may owe a duty to those who reasonably rely on that undertaking.
- Reasonable reliance
- The claimant must show actual reliance on the statement and that such reliance was reasonable in all the circumstances.
- Common duty of care
- An occupier must take reasonable care to ensure lawful visitors are safe for the purposes for which they are present on the premises.
- Trespasser duty
- An occupier owes trespassers only a duty not to cause injury by reckless or deliberate conduct, or such duty as statute prescribes.
- Non-delegable employer duty
- An employer owes a personal duty to employees to provide a safe workplace, safe plant, competent staff and a safe system of work.
- Vicarious liability
- An employer is liable for torts committed by an employee in the course of employment, including acts closely connected with authorised duties.
- Battery
- The intentional application of unlawful force to another person without consent; the force need not be hostile if it is direct and intentional.
- Assault
- An intentional act causing another person reasonably to apprehend immediate unlawful force, without consent or lawful justification.
- False imprisonment
- The intentional and complete deprivation of another's liberty without lawful justification; the claimant need not be aware of it at the time.
- Self-defence
- A defence requiring an honest and reasonable belief in the need for force and a response proportionate to the threat faced.
- Strict liability
- Liability imposed without proof of fault; the claimant must prove the harm and causal link, but not that the defendant was negligent.
- Rylands v Fletcher rule
- Liability for the escape of a dangerous thing brought onto land in a non-natural use, causing foreseeable damage to another's land.
- Non-natural use
- A use of land that is extraordinary or inappropriate to the locality, excluding ordinary domestic or ordinary commercial use.
- Product liability
- Strict liability imposed on producers for defective products causing physical damage or personal injury, subject to statutory defences.
- Private nuisance
- An unlawful and substantial interference with the claimant's use and enjoyment of land, judged by locality, duration, sensitivity and malice.
- Public nuisance
- An unlawful act or omission endangering the life, health, property or comfort of the public; a private claimant must show special damage.
- Nuisance remedies
- Damages compensate for loss of amenity or diminution in value; injunctions restrain the interference, and abatement permits self-help removal.
- Prescription defence
- Twenty years' continuance of the nuisance by the defendant may give a prescriptive right to continue the activity, barring an injunction.