NSE English 10 study materials
NSE English 10 study resources

Two Reports, One Collision

NSE English 10 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Two Reports, One Collision

Two online news items cover the same incident: a minibus and a school van collide at a junction; six children are treated at a clinic and released. Report A is headlined 'Reckless minibus driver rams school van - children shaken'. It quotes a bystander ('Everyone knows these drivers') and one unnamed police source, and runs a close photograph of the van's buckled rear doors. Report B is headlined 'Six students treated after junction collision'. It quotes the police media officer, gives the junction's crash count (eleven in two years), states that both drivers were breath-tested, and runs a wide photograph showing the faded Stop line. A student says, 'Report A is the true one because it tells you who caused the crash.'

1. How should the class respond to the student's claim that Report A is 'the true one'?

Read the worked answer

The claim confuses informativeness with accuracy.

  • Attribution. A's sharpest claim - that the minibus driver was at fault - rests on a bystander's opinion and an unnamed source. Neither can be checked. B quotes a named officer and reports a verifiable fact: both drivers were breath-tested.
  • Word choice. 'Reckless' and 'rams' are verdicts placed in a headline before any evidence appears. B's headline names an outcome and a number.
  • What A has. The close photograph and the shaken children are real. A is not fabricated; it is selectively framed.

The defensible position is that A tells a more emotionally complete story and a less reliable causal one. The question that moves the student is concrete: which sentence in A could he defend in a courtroom?

2. What does Report A's close photograph do that Report B's wide photograph does not?

Read the worked answer

A's close shot crops to the buckled rear doors. Cropping removes the junction, the light, the road markings and the other vehicle, so the reader is given an effect with no visible cause. Because those doors frame where children sat, the image performs the work of the word 'children' in the headline: it produces concern that then attaches to the driver the text has already blamed.

B's wide shot includes the faded Stop line. That is not neutral either - it invites a systemic reading (poor junction, eleven crashes in two years) instead of an individual one.

Neither photograph is decoration. Each supplies a cause the words leave open, and students should be able to name what was left outside the frame as well as what was included.