PEI ELA French Immersion study plan
PEI ELA French Immersion · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
English Language Arts Content Knowledge
Map the Domain 1 blueprint into a checklist of grammar, vocabulary, and text-type subskills, then rate your confidence on each item from 1 to 5.
Review English syntax fundamentals (phrase structure, clause types, coordination and subordination) and write 10 original sentences that demonstrate each structure.
Build a personal error log of 15 recurring usage problems (e.g., subject-verb agreement, pronoun reference, tense consistency) with a corrected example for each.
Read one short English literary excerpt and annotate it for diction, imagery, and sentence rhythm, noting how form supports meaning.
Your checkpoint
A one-page Domain 1 skill inventory with confidence ratings plus a 15-entry usage error log, each entry containing a wrong version, a corrected version, and a one-sentence rule.
English Language Arts Content Knowledge
Analyze how English morphology and etymology (roots, prefixes, suffixes) build academic vocabulary, and classify 30 exam-relevant terms by word family.
Compare English and French grammatical structures (adjective placement, auxiliary choice, pronoun order, negation) and tabulate 12 contrasts that could cause transfer errors.
Draft 8 short multiple-choice-style items on grammar or vocabulary and justify the correct answer and each distractor in writing.
Summarize the stages of first-language literacy development and connect each stage to a classroom implication for immersion learners.
Your checkpoint
A two-column contrast chart of 12 English-French structural differences with a predicted learner error for each, plus 8 self-written practice items with written rationales.
French Immersion Pedagogy and Second-Language Acquisition
Explain the core claims of second-language acquisition theory (comprehensible input, interaction, output hypothesis, noticing) and match each to one concrete immersion classroom move.
Distinguish BICS from CALP and identify three instructional decisions that change when a task moves from conversational to academic language demands.
Design a 20-minute French immersion activity that integrates content learning with explicit language focus, and annotate where each acquisition principle appears.
Describe how literacy transfers from English to French and name three cross-linguistic strategies you would teach explicitly.
Your checkpoint
A lesson-annotation document: one 20-minute French-medium activity plan with margin notes linking at least four named SLA principles to specific moments in the plan.
French Immersion Pedagogy and Second-Language Acquisition & Oral Communication and Listening in Immersion Contexts
Plan a sequence of three oral interaction tasks (information gap, opinion exchange, collaborative problem-solving) that push learners toward extended French output.
Write the teacher-talk script for one lesson, marking where you will simplify input, recast errors, and elicit student production.
Define a feedback protocol for oral French that separates meaning-focused correction from form-focused correction and states when each is appropriate.
Record yourself delivering 5 minutes of French instruction, then transcribe it and mark fluency breakdowns, anglicisms, and repair moves.
Your checkpoint
An oral interaction unit outline containing three task descriptions, a teacher-talk script with correction points marked, and a self-assessment of your own 5-minute recording listing at least 6 specific fixes.
Reading Comprehension and Literary Analysis
Practice close reading of English literary and informational texts by writing a thesis-plus-evidence paragraph for three different passages.
Identify and define 20 literary and rhetorical devices, then locate an original example of each in texts you read this week.
Compare two short texts on a shared theme and articulate the difference in argument or authorial stance with quoted support.
Analyze how French and English text structures differ (paragraph logic, connectors, formality) and note three comprehension traps for immersion readers.
Your checkpoint
Three analytical paragraphs (one literary, one informational, one comparative), each with a defensible thesis and at least two quoted supports, plus a 20-term device glossary with your own examples.
Writing Process, Composition, and Language Conventions
Draft, revise, and finalize one 500-word English analytical essay using a visible planning, drafting, and revision cycle.
Apply a revision checklist covering organization, cohesion, sentence variety, and word choice, and document 10 concrete edits you made.
Produce a parallel 250-word French text on the same topic and inventory the errors you make in French that you do not make in English.
Teach one grammar or convention point through a 5-minute mini-lesson script that includes modeling, guided practice, and a check for understanding.
Your checkpoint
A finished 500-word English essay with an annotated revision history (before/after for 10 edits), a 250-word French companion text, and a French error inventory categorized by type.
Assessment, Differentiation, and Literacy Intervention & Planning, Curriculum Alignment, and Integration of Language and Content
Design a formative assessment for a French immersion literacy objective, including a rubric with three performance levels and student-friendly descriptors.
Build a differentiation plan for one lesson that addresses three learner profiles (a newcomer, a strong bilingual, a struggling decoder) with distinct supports.
Sequence a 5-lesson mini-unit that names both the content objective and the language objective for each lesson and shows where they reinforce each other.
Outline a tiered intervention response for a student below benchmark in French reading, naming screening, progress-monitoring, and instructional adjustments.
Your checkpoint
A mini-unit plan of 5 lessons, each with paired content and language objectives, one analytic rubric, and a differentiation table covering three learner profiles with specific scaffolds.
English Language Arts Content Knowledge & French Immersion Pedagogy and Second-Language Acquisition & Reading Comprehension and Literary Analysis & Writing Process, Composition, and Language Conventions & Oral Communication and Listening in Immersion Contexts & Assessment, Differentiation, and Literacy Intervention & Planning, Curriculum Alignment, and Integration of Language and Content
Synthesize all seven domains into a one-page concept map showing how content knowledge, pedagogy, and assessment connect in immersion instruction.
Complete a timed 60-question mixed practice set across all domains and log your accuracy per domain.
Re-teach your three weakest subskills from the error log and the practice set, writing a short explanation of each in your own words.
Rehearse and record a 10-minute response explaining how you would plan and assess an integrated French immersion literacy lesson.
Your checkpoint
A domain-by-domain accuracy report from the timed practice set with a targeted remediation note for each subskill below 75%, plus a recorded 10-minute integrated-lesson response and a final one-page concept map.
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain 12 English-French structural contrasts from memory and predict the learner error each one causes, without consulting your chart.
Week 4: You can deliver a 20-minute French-medium activity whose plan cites at least four SLA principles at specific instructional moments, and your recorded self-assessment identifies 6 or more concrete fixes.
Week 6: Your 500-word English essay passes your own revision checklist with 10 documented edits, and your French companion text shows an error inventory with no repeated error type left unaddressed.
Week 7: Your 5-lesson mini-unit states a distinct content and language objective for every lesson, and the rubric's three performance levels are distinguishable without reference to student names.
Week 8: Mixed practice accuracy is at or above 75% in every domain, and any domain below that threshold has a written remediation note naming the subskill, the cause of the error, and the next study action.