PEI Math 521K study plan
PEI Math 521K · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Real Number System and Elementary Logic & Proof Technique and Rigorous Argumentation
Write out the field and order axioms for R from memory, then prove three consequences (uniqueness of 0 and 1, cancellation laws, sign rules for products of negatives) without consulting notes.
Prove by induction that 1+2+...+n = n(n+1)/2 and that 2^n > n for all n ≥ 1, stating the base case and inductive step explicitly each time.
Translate five English statements into quantified logic with correct quantifier order, and negate each one mechanically (swap ∀/∃, negate the predicate).
Distinguish valid proof patterns (direct, contrapositive, contradiction, induction) by matching each of eight short claims to the technique that actually works, and explain why the others fail.
Prove the Archimedean property and the density of Q in R using only completeness (supremum) as a starting point.
Your checkpoint
A handwritten or typeset proof portfolio of 10 complete proofs (axioms, induction, quantifier negation, Archimedean property, density of Q) with each step justified by a named axiom, definition, or prior result.
Real Number System and Elementary Logic & Sequences, Series, and Limits
Prove that every nonempty subset of R bounded above has a least upper bound, and use it to derive the nested interval property and the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem for sequences.
State the ε-N definition of convergence and use it to prove limits of at least four sequences from scratch, including one where you must choose N as an explicit function of ε.
Prove that convergent sequences are bounded and that limits are unique, writing the triangle-inequality estimates explicitly.
Classify monotone sequences using the monotone convergence theorem, and apply it to a recursively defined sequence to prove convergence and identify the limit.
Define limsup and liminf via ε-characterizations and prove that lim a_n exists iff limsup a_n = liminf a_n.
Your checkpoint
A one-page 'toolkit' sheet listing the completeness, nested interval, Bolzano–Weierstrass, and monotone convergence statements plus a worked ε-N proof template, verified by re-deriving two of the theorems from memory in under 20 minutes.
Sequences, Series, and Limits
Prove the Cauchy criterion for sequences and give an example of a Cauchy sequence in a non-complete setting to show why completeness matters.
Apply the comparison, ratio, root, and integral tests to at least eight series, justifying convergence or divergence in each case with the hypotheses checked.
Prove absolute convergence implies convergence, and construct a conditionally convergent series whose terms can be rearranged to a different sum.
Prove the alternating series test and estimate the remainder for a specific series with an explicit error bound.
Compute limits of sequences using standard limits, Stolz–Cesàro or l'Hôpital-style reductions where legitimate, and justify each substitution.
Your checkpoint
A graded-style problem set of 12 series problems solved end to end, each with hypothesis verification, conclusion, and a one-line statement of which test was used and why it applies.
Continuity and Uniform Continuity & Proof Technique and Rigorous Argumentation
Write the ε-δ definition of continuity and prove continuity of polynomials, rational functions off their zeros, and compositions from the definitions.
Distinguish pointwise from uniform continuity with a proof that f(x) = x² is not uniformly continuous on R but is on [0, 1], using the sequential criterion.
Prove that continuous functions on compact intervals attain their extrema and are uniformly continuous there (Heine–Cantor), citing compactness correctly.
Apply the intermediate value theorem to prove existence of roots, and use the extreme value theorem to justify optimization claims.
Identify and repair three common logical errors in continuity proofs (choosing δ after ε-dependent quantities, confusing pointwise with uniform, ignoring domain restrictions).
Your checkpoint
A two-column comparison table of pointwise vs. uniform continuity (definition, sequential criterion, examples, counterexamples, preservation under operations) plus four fully written proofs, including the Heine–Cantor theorem.
Differentiation and Mean Value Theorems
Prove differentiability implies continuity, and give an example of a continuous nowhere-differentiable-in-a-point function to separate the notions.
Derive the product, quotient, and chain rules from the limit definition, stating each hypothesis.
State and prove Rolle's theorem, then derive the mean value theorem and use it to prove that a function with zero derivative on an interval is constant.
Apply the MVT and Cauchy MVT to prove inequalities and to establish l'Hôpital's rule for the 0/0 case.
Prove Taylor's theorem with Lagrange remainder and use it to bound approximation error for a specific function.
Your checkpoint
A single written proof chain: Rolle → MVT → Cauchy MVT → Taylor with remainder, each implication fully justified, plus two applied problems (an inequality proved by MVT and an error bound from Taylor).
Riemann and Improper Integration & Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
Prove integrability of continuous functions on closed intervals using uniform continuity and Riemann sums, and state the Darboux criterion for integrability.
Prove the fundamental theorem of calculus in both parts, carefully tracking which hypotheses (continuity, integrability) are needed for each.
Evaluate improper integrals of both types, deciding convergence with comparison and limit tests, and prove convergence or divergence for at least five examples.
Distinguish pointwise from uniform convergence of function series, and prove the Weierstrass M-test and use it on a power series.
Prove that uniform convergence preserves continuity and permits term-by-term integration, and give a counterexample showing pointwise convergence does not.
Your checkpoint
A concept map linking Riemann integrability, FTC, improper integrals, pointwise vs. uniform convergence, and the M-test, where every arrow is labeled with the theorem that justifies it, accompanied by three fully written proofs.
Metric Spaces, Topology of R^n, and Compactness
Verify the metric space axioms for R^n with Euclidean, taxicab, and sup metrics, and prove that the three are equivalent for convergence.
Prove that compactness, sequential compactness, and closed-and-bounded are equivalent in R^n (Heine–Borel), and identify which implications fail in general metric spaces.
Determine openness, closedness, closure, interior, and boundary for at least six concrete subsets of R², justifying each claim with a proof or counterexample.
Prove that continuous images of compact sets are compact and that continuous real-valued functions on compact sets attain extrema.
Use the Baire category or nested compact set argument to prove a nonempty intersection result, and explain where completeness is used.
Your checkpoint
A topology worksheet: a table of eight subsets of R² with open/closed/compact/connected verdicts and a proof sketch per cell, plus three complete theorem proofs (Heine–Borel, continuous image of compact, extreme value theorem).
Multivariable Calculus: Derivatives, Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems & Proof Technique and Rigorous Argumentation
Compute partial derivatives, gradients, Jacobians, and directional derivatives for multivariable functions, and verify differentiability via the linear approximation definition rather than partials alone.
Prove the chain rule in several variables and use it to compute derivatives of compositions.
State and apply the inverse function theorem, checking the nonvanishing Jacobian hypothesis, and compute the derivative of an inverse map.
State and apply the implicit function theorem to solve for one variable in terms of others, verifying hypotheses, and compute implicit derivatives.
Assemble a timed 3-hour mock exam covering all nine domains and grade it against a rubric, logging every lost point by domain.
Your checkpoint
A completed timed mock exam with a self-graded score report broken down by domain, plus a one-page error log listing each mistake, its root cause, and the specific theorem or definition to review before exam day.
Milestones
Week 2: Can state and prove the completeness axiom's key consequences (Archimedean property, density of Q, Bolzano–Weierstrass) and write a correct ε-N proof for a new sequence in under 15 minutes without notes.
Week 4: Can write the ε-δ definition, prove Heine–Cantor from compactness, and correctly distinguish pointwise from uniform continuity on three unseen examples, scoring at least 8/10 on a self-made continuity quiz.
Week 6: Can prove both parts of the FTC and the Weierstrass M-test from memory, and correctly classify five unseen function series as uniformly convergent or not with justification.
Week 8: Scores at least 70% on the timed 3-hour mock exam with no domain below 50%, and the error log shows each weak domain mapped to a specific theorem or definition to re-review.