Quebec Class 1 study materials
Quebec Class 1 study resources

Quebec Class 1: Cargo Securement, Weights and Dimensions

Quebec Class 1 · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Cargo Securement, Weights and Dimensions

What this domain tests

Cargo questions combine the federal cargo securement standard with Quebec weight and dimension limits. The exam wants the arithmetic: working load limit, number of tiedowns, axle loads.

Securement rules

  • Working load limit (WLL) of a tiedown assembly is 50% of its breaking strength.
  • The aggregate WLL of all tiedowns must be at least 50% of the weight of the article.
  • Minimum tiedowns: one for an article 1.52 m or less and 500 kg or less; two for an article longer than 1.52 m but not more than 2.44 m; three for anything longer than 2.44 m. Tiedowns must be attached within 1.2 m of each end.
  • Tiedowns must contact the article directly, not be stacked on one another, and be protected from sharp edges.
  • Commodity rules override the general ones: coils, logs, dressed lumber, vehicles, boulders, hay and containers each have their own requirements.
  • Re-check the load shortly after departure and at every stop.

Weights and dimensions

  • Quebec general limits: width 2.6 m, height 4.15 m, tractor-trailer length about 23 m. Anything beyond needs a special permit and a planned route.
  • You must respect both gross vehicle weight and each axle group limit. A load placed too far back lightens the steer axle and destroys steering grip; too far forward overloads it.
  • Scale the load when in doubt; an overloaded axle is both an offence and a handling problem.

Worked example

A 9,000 kg machine, 3 m long, goes on a flatdeck. At 3 m it needs at least three tiedowns. You plan four chains, each with a WLL of 2,300 kg. Aggregate WLL is 9,200 kg, well above half the cargo weight (4,500 kg), so the chains are strong enough - but only if they are attached within 1.2 m of each end and in direct contact with the machine.

Traps that cost marks

Quoting a chain's breaking strength instead of its WLL; using only two tiedowns on a 3 m article; and forgetting that the rear of a long load needs its own tiedown.