Bouncer Removal and a Fall at a Saskatoon Bar
At 23:45 you are the licensed guard at a Saskatoon bar with a capacity of 300 and about 180 patrons. A 22-year-old man is visibly intoxicated: slurred speech, unsteady, spilled drink. He has not hit anyone, but he shouted at a server who refused him service. The manager points at him and says, 'Get him out now.' As you approach, a bouncer who does not work for your company grabs the man's left arm. The man twists away, slips on spilled beer, and falls, striking his elbow and the back of his head on a low stage. He is dazed and repeats the same question. His friend starts recording and says, 'He's having a seizure.' The crowd is pressing closer.
1. Who has authority to remove the man, and what is your role compared with the bouncer's and the manager's?
Read the worked answer
The manager, as the establishment's authorized representative, can request that an intoxicated patron leave the premises. That request gives you authority to assist with a lawful removal, but it does not authorize excessive force. The bouncer may be acting for the bar, but if he is not your employer's agent, you cannot rely on him to set your use-of-force standard. You remain responsible for your own actions and for following your licensing and employer policy. Your role is to coordinate, communicate, and keep the removal safe, not to join a sudden grab. Before any hands-on action, confirm the manager's request, give the man a clear direction and a chance to leave voluntarily, and consider whether he needs medical help. After the fall, your role shifts immediately to first aid and scene control. You should not let the bouncer continue restraining him while he is dazed.
2. Analyze the force used up to the fall and your immediate actions afterward.
Read the worked answer
The removal request was lawful in principle, but the arm grab was premature for a man who was intoxicated and shouting yet not assaultive. A verbal direction and an escort with space would have been lower risk. The fall was caused by a combination of the grab, the wet floor, and his impairment. Once he struck his head, any further restraint would be difficult to justify unless he became an immediate danger to others. Immediate actions: kneel at his side, check responsiveness and breathing, protect his head, and call EMS for a head injury with dazed behaviour. Do not try to sit him up quickly or restrain him. Move the crowd back, stop the music if possible, and keep the friend nearby but ask them to stop recording only if it is safe and necessary; do not grab the phone. Preserve the spilled-drink area and note the bouncer's actions.
3. How do you communicate with the friend who is recording, and how do you document conflicting accounts?
Read the worked answer
Speak calmly and briefly: 'He hit his head. I am getting EMS. Please stay back and keep talking to him; I need to check his breathing.' Do not threaten the friend or seize the phone. If the phone is interfering with care, ask them to step back, and if they refuse, create space rather than escalate. A recording can be useful evidence, so note that it exists and ask the friend to preserve it. For documentation, record each person's account separately: the friend says seizure; the bouncer says the man pulled away; you observed the grab, the slip, and the head strike. Quote exact words and label who said what. Do not write 'the patron was combative' unless you describe the behaviour. Note the time EMS was called, the injury observed, and the names of witnesses. Conflicting accounts belong in the report as accounts, not as conclusions.