TECFEE flashcards
TECFEE · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Percentage point
- The arithmetic difference between two percentages. A rate moving from 4% to 6% rises two percentage points but 50% in relative terms, so the unit must always be stated.
- Hedging language
- Words such as approximately, roughly, or in the region of that mark a figure as an estimate rather than a reported actual. Listening and reading items test whether the candidate keeps that distinction.
- Recap signal
- A phrase like to summarise or before I hand over that announces a restatement of key figures. The restated value is usually the one tested because it is the speaker's final position.
- Fiscal versus calendar year
- A fiscal year is any twelve-month reporting period chosen by the entity; a calendar year runs January to December. Reporting-period questions are answered by whichever the speaker or text names.
- Negative polarity
- Constructions such as not unlike, hardly certain, or far from complete that invert surface meaning. Transcribing the negation before selecting an option prevents the most common listening error.
- Scope qualifier
- A phrase such as consolidated, standalone, or excluding discontinued operations that defines which entities or periods a figure covers. A correct number under the wrong scope is a wrong answer.
- Point-in-time versus flow
- Balance-sheet items are stated as of a date; income and cash-flow items cover a period. Reading questions frequently test whether the candidate matched the stem to the right basis.
- Footnote cross-reference
- A pointer such as see Note 14 that often contains the exception or qualification overturning an answer drawn from the main narrative. Checking it is a decisive reading habit.
- Comparator mismatch
- The passage compares a figure to forecast while the stem asks about the prior year, or vice versa. The answer must use the comparator named in the question, not the one in the text.
- Attribution in reports
- Separating management assertions from auditor or regulator statements within the same document. A stem citing the auditors excludes management commentary even when both appear on one page.
- Recognise versus disclose
- Recognise means record an amount in the primary statements; disclose means report it in the notes. The two have different effects on the face of the financial statements.
- Write down versus write off
- A write-down reduces the carrying value of an asset to a lower amount; a write-off removes the asset entirely. Both hit profit, but only the write-off eliminates the balance.
- Coupon versus yield
- The coupon is the fixed rate paid on face value; the yield is the return relative to the current market price. A bond trading below par therefore yields more than its coupon.
- Liquidity versus solvency
- Liquidity is the ability to meet obligations as they fall due; solvency is having assets in excess of liabilities. A solvent entity can still fail because of a liquidity shortfall.
- Shall, may, should
- In regulatory and contractual drafting, shall creates an obligation, may grants permission, and should expresses expectation without binding force. Exam items turn on this modal distinction.
- Third conditional
- A structure such as had the covenant been breached, the loan would have been recalled. It describes a counterfactual, not an event that occurred, and must not be read as fact.
- Uncountable financial nouns
- Capital, funding, and liquidity take singular verbs and no plural form. Securities is the exception, being the plural of security in the investment sense.
- Decision-first memo
- A memo structure that states the recommendation in the first paragraph, then the strongest supporting figures, then the risks, so a reader who stops early still has the decision.
- Number with basis
- Any figure written with its unit, period, and measurement basis attached, for example revenue up 8% year on year on a constant-currency basis. Bare figures are not auditable prose.
- Variance explanation triad
- A complete variance note names the driver, quantifies its effect, and identifies any offset. Omitting the offset overstates the driver and is the usual weakness in written answers.
- Nominalisation
- Turning a verb into an abstract noun, as in a decision was made instead of we decided. It obscures who acted and weakens financial writing, so it is removed in revision.
- Hedging calibration in writing
- Using expected for forecasts, reported for actuals, and indicated for guidance. Applying will to an unaudited projection misrepresents certainty and is a common marking penalty.
- Source line
- A closing note naming author, date, and data basis, such as unaudited management accounts at 30 June. It makes a memo defensible when figures are later challenged.
- Four-part verbal update
- Headline result, one driver, one risk, next milestone. The structure keeps a two-minute spoken update inside its time budget and prevents drift into background.
- Echo-back clarification
- Repeating a figure with its unit and period before commenting, as in so that is 3.1%, annualised, net of fees? It prevents answering the wrong question in a live call.
- Register in recommendations
- Conventional phrasing such as we are overweight, we initiate at buy, or we see downside to. Using the wrong register signals unfamiliarity with professional investment communication.
- Unknown-handling protocol
- State what is known, name the missing input, and commit to a time to supply it. Silent estimation in a client conversation is the failure mode this protocol prevents.
- Change-my-mind test
- Stating in advance what evidence would overturn a recommendation. Including it distinguishes analysis from advocacy and is expected in a spoken defence of a view.
- Speaking rate budget
- Speech runs at roughly 130 to 150 words per minute, so a 90-second answer is about 200 words. That caps a response at three substantive points.
- Billion scale ambiguity
- English billion is 10^9 while some conventions use 10^12 for the same word. The target term must be fixed before translating any large monetary figure.
- Date disambiguation
- Numeric dates such as 03/04/2025 are read as 3 April in most conventions and 4 March in US usage. Target texts should spell the month to remove the ambiguity.
- Covenant versus warranty
- A covenant is a promise to do or not do something; a warranty is a statement of fact whose breach gives a remedy. Translating both with one generic term destroys the legal distinction.