CAE study materials
CAE study resources

A coalition statement and an inaccurate statistic

CAE · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A coalition statement and an inaccurate statistic

An association belongs to a coalition working on a policy issue relevant to its members. The coalition circulates a draft public statement containing a statistic that staff cannot verify and a proposed position broader than the association’s approved agenda. Several members have different interests in the issue, and a chapter has already posted its own interpretation. The coalition asks for an immediate public endorsement because a comment deadline is approaching. The association’s agreements define its contribution but do not clearly say that it accepts every later position. Leadership can obtain the evidence and consult the authorized decision-makers before responding. The draft has not yet been approved for publication under the association’s process.

1. What should the executive resolve before endorsement?

Read the worked answer

Verify the evidence and scope, follow the association’s authorized position process, and assess its coalition obligations. Do not describe an unapproved position as unanimous agreement or treat deadline pressure as a substitute for accuracy and authority.

2. How should communication be coordinated?

Read the worked answer

Clarify national, component and coalition roles, state only the position actually authorized and correct unsupported information. Explain what is known and any limits, while preserving a record of the decision and the applicable reporting or submission requirements.