CAASPP study plan
CAASPP · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for ELA
Explain how the Smarter Balanced ELA summative is structured by claim (reading, writing, listening, research/inquiry) and how each claim is reported
Distinguish the computer-adaptive section from the performance task and describe the sequence a student experiences
Identify the item types used in ELA (selected response, short text, constructed response, full write) and what each demands of a student
Map the ELA achievement levels and scale score ranges to what a candidate must know for score interpretation
Your checkpoint
A one-page ELA blueprint table listing each claim, its item types, its approximate share of the test, and the reporting category it feeds
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for Mathematics
Describe how the Smarter Balanced Mathematics summative is organized by claim (concepts and procedures, problem solving, modeling/data analysis, communicating reasoning)
Explain how the adaptive routing works and how performance tasks differ from the computer-adaptive segment in math
Differentiate calculator-allowed from non-calculator portions and describe the embedded tools available to students
Interpret math scale scores and achievement levels against grade-level expectations
Your checkpoint
A comparison chart of the four math claims with example item stems and the reasoning each claim targets
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for ELA & Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for Mathematics
Compare ELA and math test-taking logistics: session timing, testing window rules, and administration steps a coordinator must follow
Summarize accessibility resources common to both domains (universal tools, designated supports, accommodations) and who authorizes each
Practice interpreting released-style score reports by writing two short student profiles and the instructional implication of each
Identify common administration irregularities and the correct response for each
Your checkpoint
A two-domain administration checklist covering pre-test, test-day, and post-test steps with the accessibility decision point flagged
California Science Test (CAST)
Describe the CAST structure, including its three-dimensional design drawing on science and engineering practices, disciplinary core ideas, and crosscutting concepts
Explain how CAST items are organized around performance expectations and how grade-band testing works in California
Distinguish CAST item types and the role of simulations or stimulus-based item sets
Interpret CAST scale scores and achievement levels relative to the California Next Generation Science Standards
Your checkpoint
A CAST domain summary that pairs each of the three dimensions with one sample classroom scenario and the assessment implication
California Alternate Assessments (CAAs)
Explain the purpose and eligibility criteria for the California Alternate Assessments in ELA, math, and science
Describe how the CAA item sets are built around alternate achievement standards and the least restrictive environment principle
Outline the role of the individualized education program team in selecting the CAA and documenting the decision
Differentiate CAA administration procedures from the general summative assessments
Your checkpoint
An eligibility decision flowchart for CAA selection with the IEP-team touchpoints and documentation requirements labeled
California Spanish Assessment (CSA)
Describe the California Spanish Assessment purpose, target population, and how it differs from a translation of the ELA test
Explain the CSA content coverage across reading, writing, listening, and speaking-related constructs as reported
Identify who should be administered the CSA and how results are used for reclassification and program placement
Interpret CSA score reports and their relationship to ELPAC results
Your checkpoint
A CSA vs. ELPAC comparison table covering purpose, population, constructs assessed, and how each result is used
ELPAC (Initial, Initial Alternate, Summative, Summative Alternate)
Distinguish the four ELPAC assessments (Initial, Initial Alternate, Summative, Summative Alternate) by purpose, timing, and eligible population
Explain the Initial ELPAC identification process and how it feeds initial classification of English learners
Describe the Summative ELPAC domains and how results support reclassification decisions alongside other criteria
Outline Alternate ELPAC eligibility and how it aligns with significant cognitive disability criteria
Your checkpoint
An ELPAC decision matrix showing which assessment applies at each point in a student's English learner journey, from identification to reclassification
CAASPP and ELPAC Interim Assessments
Describe the purpose and design of CAASPP and ELPAC interim assessments as formative tools rather than accountability measures
Explain how interim assessments connect to the summative blueprints and how teachers can use them for instructional planning
Compare the available interim assessment options and the reporting each provides
Synthesize all seven domains into a review outline and identify remaining weak areas for continued study
Your checkpoint
A full-domain synthesis sheet plus a 20-question self-quiz with answer key that you score, listing any domain below 80 percent as a follow-up target
Milestones
Week 2: Without notes, sketch the claim structure of both ELA and math summatives and state one item type unique to each; score yourself against your week 1 and 2 deliverables
Week 4: Explain the CAST three-dimensional design and the ELA/math accessibility tiers to a colleague in under five minutes, then log any gaps you had to gloss over
Week 6: Correctly match ten scenario cards (student profiles) to the right assessment among CAA, CSA, and ELPAC variants, with at least nine correct
Week 8: Complete the 20-question self-quiz at 80 percent or higher overall with no domain below 70 percent; otherwise schedule two additional review sessions in the weakest domain