CAASPP study materials
CAASPP study resources

CAASPP study plan

CAASPP · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for ELA

  • Explain how the Smarter Balanced ELA summative is structured by claim (reading, writing, listening, research/inquiry) and how each claim is reported

  • Distinguish the computer-adaptive section from the performance task and describe the sequence a student experiences

  • Identify the item types used in ELA (selected response, short text, constructed response, full write) and what each demands of a student

  • Map the ELA achievement levels and scale score ranges to what a candidate must know for score interpretation

Your checkpoint

A one-page ELA blueprint table listing each claim, its item types, its approximate share of the test, and the reporting category it feeds

Week 2

Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for Mathematics

  • Describe how the Smarter Balanced Mathematics summative is organized by claim (concepts and procedures, problem solving, modeling/data analysis, communicating reasoning)

  • Explain how the adaptive routing works and how performance tasks differ from the computer-adaptive segment in math

  • Differentiate calculator-allowed from non-calculator portions and describe the embedded tools available to students

  • Interpret math scale scores and achievement levels against grade-level expectations

Your checkpoint

A comparison chart of the four math claims with example item stems and the reasoning each claim targets

Week 3

Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for ELA & Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for Mathematics

  • Compare ELA and math test-taking logistics: session timing, testing window rules, and administration steps a coordinator must follow

  • Summarize accessibility resources common to both domains (universal tools, designated supports, accommodations) and who authorizes each

  • Practice interpreting released-style score reports by writing two short student profiles and the instructional implication of each

  • Identify common administration irregularities and the correct response for each

Your checkpoint

A two-domain administration checklist covering pre-test, test-day, and post-test steps with the accessibility decision point flagged

Week 4

California Science Test (CAST)

  • Describe the CAST structure, including its three-dimensional design drawing on science and engineering practices, disciplinary core ideas, and crosscutting concepts

  • Explain how CAST items are organized around performance expectations and how grade-band testing works in California

  • Distinguish CAST item types and the role of simulations or stimulus-based item sets

  • Interpret CAST scale scores and achievement levels relative to the California Next Generation Science Standards

Your checkpoint

A CAST domain summary that pairs each of the three dimensions with one sample classroom scenario and the assessment implication

Week 5

California Alternate Assessments (CAAs)

  • Explain the purpose and eligibility criteria for the California Alternate Assessments in ELA, math, and science

  • Describe how the CAA item sets are built around alternate achievement standards and the least restrictive environment principle

  • Outline the role of the individualized education program team in selecting the CAA and documenting the decision

  • Differentiate CAA administration procedures from the general summative assessments

Your checkpoint

An eligibility decision flowchart for CAA selection with the IEP-team touchpoints and documentation requirements labeled

Week 6

California Spanish Assessment (CSA)

  • Describe the California Spanish Assessment purpose, target population, and how it differs from a translation of the ELA test

  • Explain the CSA content coverage across reading, writing, listening, and speaking-related constructs as reported

  • Identify who should be administered the CSA and how results are used for reclassification and program placement

  • Interpret CSA score reports and their relationship to ELPAC results

Your checkpoint

A CSA vs. ELPAC comparison table covering purpose, population, constructs assessed, and how each result is used

Week 7

ELPAC (Initial, Initial Alternate, Summative, Summative Alternate)

  • Distinguish the four ELPAC assessments (Initial, Initial Alternate, Summative, Summative Alternate) by purpose, timing, and eligible population

  • Explain the Initial ELPAC identification process and how it feeds initial classification of English learners

  • Describe the Summative ELPAC domains and how results support reclassification decisions alongside other criteria

  • Outline Alternate ELPAC eligibility and how it aligns with significant cognitive disability criteria

Your checkpoint

An ELPAC decision matrix showing which assessment applies at each point in a student's English learner journey, from identification to reclassification

Week 8

CAASPP and ELPAC Interim Assessments

  • Describe the purpose and design of CAASPP and ELPAC interim assessments as formative tools rather than accountability measures

  • Explain how interim assessments connect to the summative blueprints and how teachers can use them for instructional planning

  • Compare the available interim assessment options and the reporting each provides

  • Synthesize all seven domains into a review outline and identify remaining weak areas for continued study

Your checkpoint

A full-domain synthesis sheet plus a 20-question self-quiz with answer key that you score, listing any domain below 80 percent as a follow-up target

Milestones

Week 2: Without notes, sketch the claim structure of both ELA and math summatives and state one item type unique to each; score yourself against your week 1 and 2 deliverables

Week 4: Explain the CAST three-dimensional design and the ELA/math accessibility tiers to a colleague in under five minutes, then log any gaps you had to gloss over

Week 6: Correctly match ten scenario cards (student profiles) to the right assessment among CAA, CSA, and ELPAC variants, with at least nine correct

Week 8: Complete the 20-question self-quiz at 80 percent or higher overall with no domain below 70 percent; otherwise schedule two additional review sessions in the weakest domain