CAMS-RM study materials
CAMS-RM study resources

CAMS-RM flashcards

CAMS-RM · Build recall with a focused review session.

32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.

Risk-based approach
Resource allocation proportionate to identified ML/TF risk, with documented rationale for every risk-based decision and control depth matched to residual risk.
Four pillars
Internal controls, designated compliance officer, ongoing training, and independent testing; each pillar is a testable governance requirement in AML program reviews.
Three lines model
Business units own risk, compliance and risk functions set frameworks and challenge, and internal audit provides independent assurance across the program.
Risk appetite statement
Board-approved qualitative statements plus quantitative tolerances defining the level of ML/TF risk the institution is willing to accept across segments.
Residual risk
Risk remaining after applying control effectiveness; a rating requires a documented basis for how well controls reduce inherent risk.
Inherent risk factors
Customer type, geography, product or service, delivery channel, and transaction volume or value; these drive the initial risk rating before controls.
Customer due diligence
Identify and verify the customer, identify beneficial owners, understand purpose and intended nature, and conduct ongoing monitoring proportionate to risk.
Simplified due diligence
Reduced CDD measures permitted only where lower risk is documented; identification of the customer and beneficial owner is never waived.
Ongoing monitoring
Periodic CDD refresh triggered by risk rating, event-driven review of ownership or adverse media changes, and transaction behavior review against expectations.
Beneficial owner
Natural person who ultimately owns or controls the customer, or on whose behalf a transaction occurs; ownership threshold commonly 25% of shares or votes.
Source of wealth
Explanation of how the customer's total wealth was accumulated, distinct from source of funds, which explains the origin of specific money.
Control-based ownership test
Applied when no natural person meets the ownership threshold; identify the person exercising control by other means, often a senior managing official.
Scenario threshold
Value or count parameter triggering a monitoring alert; calibration must use the institution's own baseline and be validated, not copied from peers.
Alert triage
Review of monitoring alerts using KYC profile, expected activity, ownership, and adverse media to separate false positives from true matches with documented rationale.
Monitoring coverage inventory
Mapping of every product, channel, and entity to at least one monitoring scenario; unmapped items are coverage gaps requiring treatment.
Fuzzy name matching
Algorithmic comparison such as Jaro-Winkler or Levenshtein with configurable thresholds, supported by name normalization for transliteration and name order.
Event-driven re-screening
Re-screening the full customer book when sanctions or watchlists change, rather than relying only on periodic review cycles.
Adverse media screening
Review of negative news using defined sources, financial-crime relevance criteria, and recency rules to limit noise and false positives.
50 percent rule
US OFAC principle treating entities owned 50% or more, directly or indirectly, by one or more blocked persons as themselves blocked.
Sectoral sanctions
Restrictions on specific transactions such as debt, equity, or certain services with named targets, rather than a full asset freeze.
Proliferation financing
Provision of funds or financial services for weapons of mass destruction proliferation; addressed through targeted financial sanctions and export-control awareness.
Tipping-off prohibition
Rule barring disclosure of a suspicious activity report or its contents to the customer or third parties except where law expressly permits.
Suspicion threshold
Reporting is triggered by knowledge, suspicion, or reasonable grounds to suspect; proof of criminal conduct is not required for filing.
Investigation file
Record of the alert, enrichment performed, decision, approver, and date; regulators assess the documented rationale, not only the outcome.
Design versus operating effectiveness
Design asks whether a control can mitigate the risk; operating effectiveness asks whether it actually worked over the tested period.
Key risk indicators
Measurable signals such as overdue CDD percentage, alert backlog age, screening false-positive rate, training completion, and unresolved audit findings.
Independent testing
Audit or external review covering all four pillars, reporting to the board or its committee and verifying remediation of prior findings.
Model validation
Independent assessment of AML model logic, data, thresholds, and performance, documented before deployment and repeated on change.
Data lineage
Documentation of source system, transformation, and consumption point for KYC, transaction, and screening data used in AML decisions.
Trade-based laundering
Movement of value through mispriced, misdescribed, or phantom goods; indicators include over- or under-invoicing and mismatched shipping documents.
Virtual asset travel rule
Requirement that originator and beneficiary information accompany virtual asset transfers between institutions, supporting traceability and screening.
Mule account typology
Accounts used to receive and rapidly disperse fraud proceeds, often opened by recruited individuals with profiles inconsistent with expected activity.