CAMS study plan
CAMS · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks
Define money laundering and terrorist financing and distinguish their core objectives, funding sources, and detection signals
Sequence the three stages of money laundering and place at least three concrete techniques under each stage
Identify the main categories of predicate offenses and explain why the list varies by jurisdiction
List sector-specific and product-specific vulnerabilities (cash-intensive businesses, correspondent banking, prepaid access, trade, virtual assets) and rank them by inherent risk
Apply a simple likelihood-by-impact risk-scoring method to five short written scenarios
Your checkpoint
A one-page risk matrix covering at least 10 products or sectors, each with a likelihood score, impact score, and one control the institution would need.
Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks & Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Compliance Program
Classify 15 written fact patterns into laundering typologies (structuring, smurfing, trade-based, shell company, third-party payment) with a stated reason for each classification
Explain how terrorist financing differs from money laundering in amounts, timing, and fund origin, and name two detection implications
Describe the risk-based approach and justify why a purely rules-based approach creates both over- and under-control
Define the core elements of an AML/CTF program and match each element to the risk it addresses
Identify the role and independence requirements of the designated compliance officer
Your checkpoint
A typology log of 15 fact patterns with classification, reasoning, and the red flag that drove the decision, reviewed against a written answer key.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Compliance Program
Draft the skeleton of a written AML/CTF program containing policies, procedures, internal controls, and a governance structure with named accountability
Build a customer risk-rating model using at least four weighted factors (customer type, geography, product, channel) and test it on six profiles
Sequence the customer due diligence process from identification through verification, ongoing monitoring, and recordkeeping
Differentiate simplified, standard, and enhanced due diligence and state the trigger conditions for each
Specify what records must be retained, for how long, and who may access them
Your checkpoint
A two-page draft customer risk-rating model with weighted factors, three risk tiers, and six scored sample profiles that produce defensible tier assignments.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Compliance Program & Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks
Trace beneficial ownership through a three-layer corporate structure and identify the controlling person in each case
Apply enhanced due diligence requirements to politically exposed persons, including family members and close associates
Explain the risk factors and required controls for correspondent banking, nested accounts, and payable-through accounts
Design a training program with audience tiers, cadence, content outline, and a completion-tracking measure
Outline an independent testing plan covering scope, sampling, frequency, and reporting lines
Your checkpoint
Timed 40-question mixed quiz on Domains 1 and 2 with a score of at least 75%, plus a correction card for every missed item.
Conducting and Supporting the Investigation Process
Describe the alert-to-case workflow from automated monitoring through triage, investigation, escalation, and disposition
Draft written investigation questions that separate suspicious activity from legitimate activity for three sample alerts
Explain when a suspicious activity or transaction report is required and what information the narrative must convey
Identify the prohibitions and protections around tipping off and confidentiality
List the documentation an investigator must retain to support a filing or a no-action decision
Your checkpoint
Two complete sample case files, each with alert summary, investigative steps taken, evidence list, disposition decision, and a filing-quality narrative of 200 to 300 words.
Conducting and Supporting the Investigation Process & Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks
Assess monitoring scenarios and threshold settings, and explain why tuning reduces both false positives and gaps
Plan an investigation that requires documentary review, transaction tracing, and open-source or public-record research
Evaluate evidence quality by distinguishing direct, circumstantial, and unreliable sources in a written case
Recommend remediation actions for control failures uncovered during a review, tied to root cause
Explain how law enforcement requests and information-sharing mechanisms fit into the investigation lifecycle
Your checkpoint
A written investigation report of 500 to 700 words on one complex scenario, ending with a recommendation, its supporting evidence, and the control gap that allowed the activity.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Compliance Standards and Regulatory Expectations & Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Compliance Program
Summarize the expectations set by international standard-setters for national AML/CTF regimes and for financial institutions
Differentiate binding legal requirements from non-binding guidance and describe how each shapes institutional policy
Explain the role of supervisory examination, including how examiners sample files, test training, and assess governance
Map five regulatory expectations to the specific program elements that satisfy them
Identify the enforcement consequences of program failures and the elements of an effective remedial plan
Your checkpoint
A one-page crosswalk mapping at least eight regulatory expectations to the specific program element, procedure, or evidence artifact that satisfies each.
Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks & Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Compliance Program & Conducting and Supporting the Investigation Process & Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Compliance Standards and Regulatory Expectations
Consolidate all four domains into a single one-page master outline organized by risk, program, investigation, and regulation
Complete a full-length timed practice exam under test conditions and record the score by domain
Diagnose the two weakest domains from practice results and re-study only the missed concepts
Convert every repeatedly missed item into a flashcard with a rule, an example, and a distractor explanation
Rehearse scenario questions where the correct answer depends on risk-based judgment rather than a fixed rule
Your checkpoint
A scored full-length practice exam with a domain-by-domain breakdown, plus a final flashcard deck of at least 40 cards covering every missed concept.
Milestones
Week 2: Classify 12 of 15 typology fact patterns correctly without notes and state the driving red flag for each.
Week 4: Score at least 75% on the 40-question Domains 1 and 2 quiz and finish the customer risk-rating model with six defensible profile scores.
Week 6: Produce two filing-quality case narratives and one 500 to 700 word investigation report that a reviewer can follow without asking clarifying questions.
Week 8: Score at least 80% overall on the timed practice exam with no single domain below 70%, and have zero unresolved items in the flashcard deck.