CFAT study materials
CFAT study resources

Triage Conflict Between Standing Orders

CFAT · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Triage Conflict Between Standing Orders

Your unit's standing orders include three clauses. Clause 4: 'Operational requests from deployed sub-units are processed within 24 hours.' Clause 7: 'Requests for routine maintenance are handled in the order received.' Clause 9: 'Any requisition without a valid stock number is returned to the originator without action.' On Monday, a deployed sub-unit submits an urgent request for a replacement radio battery but leaves the stock number blank. On the same morning, the base workshop submits a routine maintenance request for a forklift, correctly stocked. The workshop's request arrived 40 minutes earlier. Your supervisor is away and has left you to triage the queue. The deployed sub-unit's signaller calls to say the battery is for a radio that is currently the only link to a remote patrol. You have one clerk available for the next two hours and cannot process both requests before noon. You must decide which request to act on first and what to do with the incomplete one.

1. Which request should you act on first, and which standing-order clause controls that choice? Explain how you resolve the conflict between clauses 4 and 7.

Read the worked answer

The first action is not to process either requisition exactly as submitted; it is to correct the deployed unit's requisition. Clause 9 is a validity rule: a requisition without a valid stock number is returned without action. That means the deployed request cannot simply jump the queue while it is incomplete. However, the defect is curable. The signaller is on the phone, so the fastest correct step is to obtain the stock number and annotate the requisition, rather than return it and wait for a resubmission. Once the stock number is recorded, clause 4 applies: an operational request from a deployed sub-unit is processed within 24 hours. Clause 7 does not create a conflicting priority for the workshop request; it only sets the order for routine maintenance requests among themselves. The workshop request is earlier in the routine queue, but it is not operational. The judgement call is to hold the workshop request briefly while seeking the missing stock number. If the stock number cannot be obtained within the clerk's available time, process the valid workshop request and return the incomplete operational requisition with a note explaining the missing stock number.

2. What should you do with the incomplete requisition? Does clause 9 require you to return it immediately, or is there a reasonable way to obtain the missing stock number?

Read the worked answer

Clause 9 requires that an incomplete requisition not be processed. It does not forbid asking the originator for the missing data; the purpose of the rule is to prevent invalid demands from entering the supply system, not to punish the requester. The reasonable action is to contact the deployed sub-unit, record the stock number if it can be verified, and only then treat the requisition as valid. Document the call in the triage log: time, person contacted, stock number supplied, and who verified it. If the stock number cannot be verified before the clerk must move on, return the requisition to the originator with a short note. That satisfies clause 9 and preserves the operational priority for a corrected resubmission. Do not silently process the battery request without a stock number, and do not hold the only clerk indefinitely while the workshop request waits without explanation.

3. Write a short triage log entry, three to five sentences, that separates rule-based facts from your judgement call.

Read the worked answer

Log entry: 'At 08:10 the workshop forklift requisition arrived with a valid stock number. At 08:50 the deployed sub-unit radio-battery requisition arrived without a stock number. Clause 9 prevents processing it as submitted. I called the deployed signaller at 08:55 and requested the stock number; call logged. Judgement: I am holding the workshop request briefly because the deployed request is operational under clause 4 once corrected. If the stock number is not verified by 09:30, I will process the workshop request and return the incomplete requisition with a note.' This entry separates what the orders require from the discretionary decision to hold briefly. It also sets a review time, which prevents the judgement call from becoming an indefinite delay.