ACIArb (Intro to ADR) study materials
ACIArb (Intro to ADR) study resources

ACIArb (Intro to ADR) study plan

ACIArb (Intro to ADR) · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Overview of dispute resolution processes and the ADR spectrum & Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award

  • Map the full ADR spectrum from negotiation through arbitration, adjudication and ODR, and write a one-line definition plus a typical-use example for each process

  • Distinguish binding from non-binding processes and identify which ones produce an enforceable decision and on what legal basis

  • Break the arbitration lifecycle into its stages (agreement, appointment, pleadings, evidence, hearing, award, challenge, enforcement) and label each stage with the governing instrument

  • Draft a glossary of 25 core terms spanning all eight domains, marking any term you cannot yet define confidently for later review

Your checkpoint

A one-page ADR spectrum comparison table (process, binding or not, third-party role, enforceability route, typical dispute) covering at least eight processes, plus the 25-term glossary

Week 2

Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award

  • Analyse the formal and substantive validity requirements of an arbitration agreement, including separability and the competence-competence principle

  • Compare how the New York Convention and the Model Law treat the written-form requirement and the referral of parties to arbitration by a court

  • Draft a specimen arbitration clause that fixes seat, number of arbitrators, language and institutional rules, then annotate each choice with its practical consequence

  • Explain the grounds on which an arbitration agreement can be challenged before a tribunal and before a court, and predict the likely outcome in three short fact patterns

Your checkpoint

An annotated model arbitration clause with a 400-word commentary explaining each drafting choice and the risk it mitigates

Week 3

Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award & Legal and institutional framework: New York Convention, Model Law, institutional rules

  • Outline the constitution of a tribunal: party appointment, institutional appointment, challenge and removal, and the consequences of a truncated tribunal

  • Summarise the tribunal's procedural powers and duties, including interim measures, case management and the right to be heard

  • Trace the grounds for setting aside an award and for refusing enforcement under the New York Convention, and match each ground to a realistic scenario

  • Identify the key differences between two major institutional rule sets on expedited procedure, consolidation and emergency arbitrator provisions

Your checkpoint

A two-page decision tree that takes a disputed award and routes it through set-aside and enforcement analysis, with the applicable Convention article cited at each branch

Week 4

Mediation: models, process and the mediator's role

  • Compare facilitative, evaluative, transformative and settlement-oriented mediation models and state which model suits which dispute type

  • Walk through the mediation process stage by stage, from intake and agreement to mediate through joint session, private caucus and settlement documentation

  • Practise opening statements, agenda setting and caucus questioning in a 30-minute role play and record what worked

  • Explain the mediator's duties regarding self-determination, informed consent and the limits of the mediator's role in advising on merits

Your checkpoint

A written mediation session plan for a supplied commercial dispute, including opening script, agenda, three caucus question sets and a settlement-recording checklist

Week 5

Mediation: models, process and the mediator's role & Negotiation: theory, styles and practice

  • Apply interest-based negotiation to a fact pattern by separating positions from interests and generating at least three option sets

  • Identify the negotiator's BATNA, reservation point and target, and explain how each shifts the zone of possible agreement

  • Recognise distributive, integrative and mixed-motive negotiation dynamics and choose a matching tactic for each

  • Critique a mediator's handling of an impasse by proposing three interventions and predicting their effect on the parties

Your checkpoint

A negotiation preparation sheet for a two-party dispute (interests, BATNA, reservation point, options, concession plan) plus a 300-word self-critique of your role-play performance

Week 6

Conciliation and early neutral evaluation & Other processes: adjudication, expert determination, dispute boards and ODR

  • Distinguish conciliation from mediation and arbitration on the role of the third party, the binding effect and the enforceability of any outcome

  • Explain early neutral evaluation: when it is used, who delivers it, and how a non-binding evaluation shapes settlement

  • Describe statutory adjudication and expert determination, and identify the disputes each is designed for

  • Compare standing and ad hoc dispute boards on constitution, powers and the status of their decisions

  • Assess how ODR platforms handle jurisdiction, identity, evidence and enforceability of online outcomes

Your checkpoint

A comparison brief of at least 600 words covering conciliation, early neutral evaluation, adjudication, expert determination, dispute boards and ODR, with a recommendation for one hypothetical construction dispute

Week 7

Legal and institutional framework: New York Convention, Model Law, institutional rules & Overview of dispute resolution processes and the ADR spectrum

  • Explain the New York Convention's core obligations: recognition of agreements, enforcement of awards and the exhaustive list of refusal grounds

  • Map the Model Law's structure and identify which provisions have been widely adopted and which are frequently varied

  • Compare institutional and ad hoc arbitration on administration, cost, control and enforceability risk

  • Identify the main arbitral institutions and what their rules add beyond the Model Law

Your checkpoint

A one-page reference sheet listing the Convention's refusal grounds and the matching Model Law provisions, with a worked enforcement example from a non-Convention state

Week 8

Ethics, confidentiality, impartiality and professional conduct & Mediation: models, process and the mediator's role & Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award

  • Apply the standards of impartiality and independence to three scenarios involving arbitrator disclosure and decide what must be disclosed

  • Explain the scope and limits of confidentiality in mediation and in arbitration, including exceptions such as fraud, safety and statutory reporting

  • Resolve three ethics scenarios involving mediator conflicts, party capacity and counsel conduct, citing the relevant principle

  • Complete a timed 60-question mixed mock under exam conditions and review every error against its domain

Your checkpoint

A timed mock exam score report with a written error log that classifies each mistake by domain and states the corrected rule for each

Milestones

Week 2: Can draft a valid arbitration clause from memory and list the Convention and Model Law provisions that make it enforceable

Week 4: Can run a 30-minute mediation role play through all stages without notes and explain which model was used and why

Week 6: Can distinguish all six non-arbitration processes in the brief and correctly state whether each outcome is binding and enforceable

Week 8: Mock exam score above 70 percent overall, with no single domain below 60 percent