ACIArb (Intro to ADR) study plan
ACIArb (Intro to ADR) · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Overview of dispute resolution processes and the ADR spectrum & Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award
Map the full ADR spectrum from negotiation through arbitration, adjudication and ODR, and write a one-line definition plus a typical-use example for each process
Distinguish binding from non-binding processes and identify which ones produce an enforceable decision and on what legal basis
Break the arbitration lifecycle into its stages (agreement, appointment, pleadings, evidence, hearing, award, challenge, enforcement) and label each stage with the governing instrument
Draft a glossary of 25 core terms spanning all eight domains, marking any term you cannot yet define confidently for later review
Your checkpoint
A one-page ADR spectrum comparison table (process, binding or not, third-party role, enforceability route, typical dispute) covering at least eight processes, plus the 25-term glossary
Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award
Analyse the formal and substantive validity requirements of an arbitration agreement, including separability and the competence-competence principle
Compare how the New York Convention and the Model Law treat the written-form requirement and the referral of parties to arbitration by a court
Draft a specimen arbitration clause that fixes seat, number of arbitrators, language and institutional rules, then annotate each choice with its practical consequence
Explain the grounds on which an arbitration agreement can be challenged before a tribunal and before a court, and predict the likely outcome in three short fact patterns
Your checkpoint
An annotated model arbitration clause with a 400-word commentary explaining each drafting choice and the risk it mitigates
Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award & Legal and institutional framework: New York Convention, Model Law, institutional rules
Outline the constitution of a tribunal: party appointment, institutional appointment, challenge and removal, and the consequences of a truncated tribunal
Summarise the tribunal's procedural powers and duties, including interim measures, case management and the right to be heard
Trace the grounds for setting aside an award and for refusing enforcement under the New York Convention, and match each ground to a realistic scenario
Identify the key differences between two major institutional rule sets on expedited procedure, consolidation and emergency arbitrator provisions
Your checkpoint
A two-page decision tree that takes a disputed award and routes it through set-aside and enforcement analysis, with the applicable Convention article cited at each branch
Mediation: models, process and the mediator's role
Compare facilitative, evaluative, transformative and settlement-oriented mediation models and state which model suits which dispute type
Walk through the mediation process stage by stage, from intake and agreement to mediate through joint session, private caucus and settlement documentation
Practise opening statements, agenda setting and caucus questioning in a 30-minute role play and record what worked
Explain the mediator's duties regarding self-determination, informed consent and the limits of the mediator's role in advising on merits
Your checkpoint
A written mediation session plan for a supplied commercial dispute, including opening script, agenda, three caucus question sets and a settlement-recording checklist
Mediation: models, process and the mediator's role & Negotiation: theory, styles and practice
Apply interest-based negotiation to a fact pattern by separating positions from interests and generating at least three option sets
Identify the negotiator's BATNA, reservation point and target, and explain how each shifts the zone of possible agreement
Recognise distributive, integrative and mixed-motive negotiation dynamics and choose a matching tactic for each
Critique a mediator's handling of an impasse by proposing three interventions and predicting their effect on the parties
Your checkpoint
A negotiation preparation sheet for a two-party dispute (interests, BATNA, reservation point, options, concession plan) plus a 300-word self-critique of your role-play performance
Conciliation and early neutral evaluation & Other processes: adjudication, expert determination, dispute boards and ODR
Distinguish conciliation from mediation and arbitration on the role of the third party, the binding effect and the enforceability of any outcome
Explain early neutral evaluation: when it is used, who delivers it, and how a non-binding evaluation shapes settlement
Describe statutory adjudication and expert determination, and identify the disputes each is designed for
Compare standing and ad hoc dispute boards on constitution, powers and the status of their decisions
Assess how ODR platforms handle jurisdiction, identity, evidence and enforceability of online outcomes
Your checkpoint
A comparison brief of at least 600 words covering conciliation, early neutral evaluation, adjudication, expert determination, dispute boards and ODR, with a recommendation for one hypothetical construction dispute
Legal and institutional framework: New York Convention, Model Law, institutional rules & Overview of dispute resolution processes and the ADR spectrum
Explain the New York Convention's core obligations: recognition of agreements, enforcement of awards and the exhaustive list of refusal grounds
Map the Model Law's structure and identify which provisions have been widely adopted and which are frequently varied
Compare institutional and ad hoc arbitration on administration, cost, control and enforceability risk
Identify the main arbitral institutions and what their rules add beyond the Model Law
Your checkpoint
A one-page reference sheet listing the Convention's refusal grounds and the matching Model Law provisions, with a worked enforcement example from a non-Convention state
Ethics, confidentiality, impartiality and professional conduct & Mediation: models, process and the mediator's role & Arbitration: agreement, tribunal, procedure and award
Apply the standards of impartiality and independence to three scenarios involving arbitrator disclosure and decide what must be disclosed
Explain the scope and limits of confidentiality in mediation and in arbitration, including exceptions such as fraud, safety and statutory reporting
Resolve three ethics scenarios involving mediator conflicts, party capacity and counsel conduct, citing the relevant principle
Complete a timed 60-question mixed mock under exam conditions and review every error against its domain
Your checkpoint
A timed mock exam score report with a written error log that classifies each mistake by domain and states the corrected rule for each
Milestones
Week 2: Can draft a valid arbitration clause from memory and list the Convention and Model Law provisions that make it enforceable
Week 4: Can run a 30-minute mediation role play through all stages without notes and explain which model was used and why
Week 6: Can distinguish all six non-arbitration processes in the brief and correctly state whether each outcome is binding and enforceable
Week 8: Mock exam score above 70 percent overall, with no single domain below 60 percent