Concentrated Low-Basis Stock Two Years Before Retirement Income Begins
Priya, 57, is widowed and works part-time. Her $2.1 million portfolio includes $1.3 million of employer stock accumulated over 25 years, with a cost basis of $180,000. The rest is $350,000 in a 401(k), $280,000 in bond funds, $90,000 in cash, and $80,000 in a Roth IRA. She plans to stop work at 65 and needs $70,000 per year before tax from the portfolio, in addition to an $18,000 pension at 65 and Social Security of $30,000 at 67. The stock has a 38% standard deviation, a beta of 1.3, and a dividend yield of 1.2%. Priya wants to reduce the risk but fears realizing a $1.12 million gain. She has a modest charitable intent and is uncomfortable with complex products. Her state taxes capital gains at 5%.
1. Quantify the concentration risk and the tax cost of selling. What is the danger of doing nothing, and what is the danger of selling everything at once?
Read the worked answer
Concentration: $1.3 million of $2.1 million is 61.9% of the portfolio in one stock. The remaining $800,000 must support the same spending, so the portfolio's outcome is dominated by one company's idiosyncratic risk. A 38% standard deviation means a one-year decline of roughly 38% is within one standard deviation; a $1.3 million position could fall by about $494,000 in such a year. Beta of 1.3 adds market sensitivity, but the bigger issue is uncompensated single-company risk: Priya is not paid extra expected return for holding a risk that could be diversified away. Her human capital is already linked to the employer, and the stock is also a large share of her retirement security.
Tax cost: the gain is $1.12 million. At a 23.8% federal rate (20% capital gains plus 3.8% net investment income tax) plus 5% state, the combined rate is 28.8%, or about $322,560 if the entire gain were taxed at that rate. The actual bill would be lower because gains fill brackets and some may be taxed at 15% or 18.8%, but the order of magnitude is $250,000 to $320,000. Selling all at once also risks pushing her into a higher bracket and losing flexibility.
The danger of doing nothing is that a permanent 40% decline would cut the portfolio to about $1.58 million and force her to sell shares later at depressed prices to fund the $70,000 need. The danger of selling all at once is paying the tax in one year, losing the deferral benefit, and making an irreversible decision before she has an investment plan for the proceeds. The correct frame is not 'sell or hold' but 'how much concentration risk can she afford while managing the tax cost over time.'
2. Evaluate the realistic tools for reducing the position: staged sales, a collar, an exchange fund, a charitable remainder trust, and a donor-advised fund. Which fit Priya's stated constraints?
Read the worked answer
Staged sales are the default. Selling $250,000 to $300,000 of stock per year over four to five years reduces concentration while spreading gains across brackets. Pair sales with tax-loss harvesting in the bond and 401(k) accounts where possible, and direct new cash to diversified assets. This is simple, transparent, and consistent with her discomfort with complex products.
A collar (protective put plus covered call) can limit downside while she sells. It is not a tax-free trick: if the put and call are too tightly set, the IRS may treat the position as a constructive sale under IRC Section 1259, triggering the gain. A collar with a meaningful spread between strike prices, and real economic risk retained, can defer tax, but it adds counterparty, margin, and execution complexity. It fits only as a bridge on the remaining shares, not as an answer for the whole position.
An exchange fund defers gain by contributing stock to a partnership in exchange for diversified units. It requires qualified purchaser status, has a long lock-up, layered fees, and no control over the portfolio. Priya's $2.1 million net worth may not meet the qualified purchaser threshold, and the illiquidity conflicts with her need for income at 65. It is not a good fit.
A charitable remainder trust would sell the stock tax-exempt inside the trust, pay her an income stream, and provide a partial deduction, but it is irrevocable and complex. With only modest charitable intent, it is overkill. A donor-advised fund is a better charitable tool: donate low-basis shares, avoid the gain, take a deduction for fair market value if held more than one year, subject to the 30% of AGI limit for appreciated stock to a public charity, with a five-year carryforward. It fits her modest charitable intent and simplifies the tax picture.
3. Recommend a specific de-risking plan with guardrails. Include a target concentration, a timeline, and how the proceeds should be reinvested.
Read the worked answer
Set a written investment policy statement with a single-stock ceiling of 10% to 15% of the portfolio, which means reducing the position to roughly $210,000 to $315,000. The path should be a three-year glide path, not a single trade. In year one, sell $350,000 and donate $100,000 of low-basis shares to a donor-advised fund. In year two, sell $350,000 and place a collar on the remaining shares with a floor no higher than 85% of the current price and a cap at least 15% above it, so the position retains meaningful downside and upside. In year three, sell the balance above the target ceiling and let the collar expire. Reassess annually; if the stock falls sharply, accelerate sales to use lower gains, and if it rises, sell into strength rather than letting the concentration rebuild.
Reinvest proceeds according to a liability-aware allocation. Because she needs $70,000 per year from age 65, build a three-year cash and short-bond reserve of about $210,000 before age 65. The core portfolio can be 50% to 60% diversified equities and 40% to 50% bonds and cash, adjusted so that the reserve covers spending in a down market. Use the 401(k) and Roth for tax-efficient rebalancing; hold bonds preferentially in the 401(k).
Guardrails: do not let tax deferral justify more than 15% single-stock risk; do not use a collar so tight that it is a constructive sale; do not put more than 10% of the portfolio into any exchange fund or illiquid vehicle; review the plan if the stock's dividend is cut or the company's fundamentals change. The goal is to convert an undiversified $1.3 million bet into a diversified portfolio that can support $70,000 of withdrawals with a known tax budget.