A Fifteen-Year-Old Says She Is Done
Fifteen-year-old with relapsed osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastases after two failed regimens. Oncology proposes a phase I trial: roughly 15% chance of response, substantial nausea and fatigue, and travel 2 hours each way three times a month. She is alert and oriented, understands her prognosis, and says, "I'm done. I want to be home." Her parents insist she continue - "we are not giving up on her." They have also asked the team not to discuss prognosis with her further because "it takes away her hope." Her pain is currently well controlled. She turns 16 in two months, and her oncologist asks you, her nurse, to "help get her on board."
1. Who should be making this decision, and what is your role as the nurse?
Read the worked answer
This is a genuine ethical conflict, not a decision with an obvious owner.
- Legally, at 15 she cannot consent; her parents are the decision-makers for enrollment in a trial.
- Ethically, capacity is decision-specific, and by your description she has it: she understands the information, appreciates how it applies to her, can reason about options, and can express a consistent choice. Her dissent carries substantial moral weight given her age, her experience of two regimens, and a proposed treatment with a low chance of benefit and a high burden.
- A 15% response rate with heavy symptom burden and travel is not a clear-cut best-interest intervention. That is exactly the situation in which the child's own values should weigh most heavily, and where reasonable clinicians can disagree.
Your role
- Not to "get her on board." Being asked to bring a patient around is a request to advocate for the plan, not for the patient.
- Ensure her voice is heard in a formal forum: request an ethics consultation and palliative care involvement, and make sure the attending knows she has stated a clear, repeated preference.
- Screen for depression and for reasons behind the refusal before concluding it is a settled decision, and make sure her symptoms are actually controlled.
- Do not participate in planned deception of the patient (see next task).
2. How would you structure the conversation, and what would you explore before treating her refusal as final?
Read the worked answer
Structure
- Ask before telling: "What is your understanding of where things are?" and "What has this year been like for you?"
- Reflect and name the emotion rather than correcting it.
- Ask what "done" means to her: done with this hospital, done with nausea, done with being away from home, or ready to die? These lead to very different plans.
- Separate the goals from the treatments: what does she most want in the time she has? What would make a trial bearable - fewer visits, better antiemetics, a time-limited trial with a defined stopping point?
- Close the loop and confirm what she wants shared with her parents.
Explore specifically
- Depression, hopelessness, and any wish to die - distinguish acceptance of dying from depression, which is treatable and can change a decision.
- Symptom burden - is her pain truly controlled, is she nauseated, sleeping, eating?
- Practical burdens - the 4-hour round trip, school, siblings, finances.
- What she believes she has been told - patients often piece together more than adults realize; confirm she is not deciding on a misunderstanding.
Options to offer before framing this as treat-or-nothing: a time-limited trial with explicit reassessment, palliative chemotherapy for symptom control, or home hospice with the door open. "Done" and "home" are compatible with continued palliative care.
3. The parents ask that prognosis no longer be discussed with her. What do you do, and what if the conflict remains unresolved?
Read the worked answer
On the request for deception
- Declining to lie is not the same as forcing information. You are not obliged to initiate an unwanted conversation, but you cannot participate in actively misleading her, and you should not answer direct questions dishonestly. Say so plainly to the parents, without moralizing: "I won't lie to her. If she asks me something, I'll tell her the truth gently, and I'll tell you afterward that I did."
- Reframe hope rather than removing it: hope for comfort, for time at home, for a good day - this is the palliative care conversation, and it is what makes the parents' fear bearable.
- She very likely already knows. Adolescents with relapsed cancer typically understand more than adults assume; maintaining the fiction isolates her and prevents her from saying what she needs to say.
If the conflict remains unresolved
- Ethics consultation and a structured family meeting with oncology, palliative care, the patient (at her request), and both parents; document the child's stated wishes verbatim and the parents' position.
- Consider a time-limited trial as a face-saving middle path with objective reassessment criteria agreed in advance.
- Escalate within nursing leadership if you are pressed to deceive her or to force treatment she physically resists - forced treatment of a capacitated adolescent generally requires a legal process, not a bedside decision, and nurses should not be placed in the position of physically imposing it without one.
- Debrief and support the staff. Moral distress in this scenario is expected; the plan should not depend on one nurse absorbing it alone.