Growth, school and changing support roles
An adolescent remains at a similar weight over several visits but has not followed the expected growth trajectory. They maintain high grades and want to return immediately to a demanding sport. Caregivers are concerned but have different work schedules, and one cannot attend routine daytime appointments. The young person wants private time with the clinician and feels that discussions occur only about them, not with them. A school can help with meals but does not know its responsibilities or information limits. The case does not establish a universal consent rule, an activity-clearance threshold or a complete care setting. The team must consider development, safety, resources and appropriate participation rather than use achievement, body size or one household template as a shortcut.
1. How should clinical and family assessment be framed?
Read the worked answer
Review growth, intake, symptoms and medical findings in developmental context. High grades and a stable number do not establish readiness for sport. Suitable caregivers can be recovery resources without being blamed, and work or transport barriers should be addressed practically.
2. What should the coordination plan clarify?
Read the worked answer
Explain the actual confidentiality and consent framework, provide appropriate private discussion and caregiver information, and define school support roles. Activity decisions should follow relevant qualified assessment. Review the young person’s skills and agency over time rather than freeze every responsibility indefinitely.