CFA Sustainable Investing study plan
CFA Sustainable Investing · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Investment Mandates, Portfolio Analytics, and Client Reporting & Introduction to ESG
Draft a one-page client mandate summary that names ESG objectives, constraints, benchmark choice, and reporting cadence
Map every component of an investment policy statement to at least one ESG-specific disclosure a client would expect
Build a reporting dashboard outline listing five portfolio-level ESG metrics and the caveat attached to each (coverage, weighting, data lag)
Distinguish ESG investing from SRI, impact investing, and values-based screening by writing a one-sentence definition plus a counterexample for each
List three adoption drivers each for institutional, retail, and regulatory audiences and explain why they differ
Your checkpoint
A two-page mandate-to-reporting template plus a 25-question timed self-quiz scored at 80% or better
ESG Analysis, Valuation, and Integration & ESG Integrated Portfolio Construction and Management
Adjust a simple discounted cash flow model for a carbon-price scenario, tracing the effect through margins, terminal value, and the discount rate
Classify 15 ESG issues as material or immaterial for one chosen sector, justifying each with a channel to cash flow, risk, or cost of capital
Compare negative screening, best-in-class, thematic, and full integration on universe size, tracking-error intuition, and factor exposure
Construct a hypothetical 20-holding portfolio under two ESG constraints and identify which constraint binds first
Name three ESG data pitfalls (ratings divergence, look-ahead bias, coverage gaps) and state a mitigation for each
Your checkpoint
A one-page integration memo containing a sector materiality map and a two-scenario valuation table
The ESG Market & Governance Factors
Summarize how ESG assets are measured and segmented across institutional, retail, and green-bond markets, flagging where double counting can occur
Score four fictional issuers on board independence, ownership structure, dual-class shares, and pay alignment, then rank them
Explain shareholder rights and takeover defenses and predict how each affects minority-holder value
Trace accounting red flags (aggressive revenue recognition, related-party deals, auditor turnover) to a governance-risk conclusion
Describe how ESG rating providers differ in scope, weighting, and methodology, and state the practical consequence for portfolio construction
Your checkpoint
A comparative governance scorecard for four fictional issuers with written ranking rationale
Environmental Factors & Social Factors
Separate physical risk from transition risk, giving two examples of each with a transmission channel to an issuer's cash flows
Compute weighted average carbon intensity for a small hypothetical portfolio and interpret the metric's limitations
Map social factors (labor practices, supply-chain human rights, product safety, data privacy) to sector-specific materiality
Frame biodiversity, water, and waste dependencies as financial risks rather than ethical preferences
Explain how disclosure regimes, taxonomies, and carbon pricing shape the availability and comparability of environmental data
Your checkpoint
A two-page environmental and social risk register with 10 entries, each rated for likelihood, magnitude, and time horizon
Engagement and Stewardship
Outline a full stewardship program covering policy, prioritization, engagement method, escalation, and voting
Draft an engagement letter to a fictional issuer containing a specific ask, a success metric, and a 12-month timeline
Distinguish individual, collaborative, and thematic engagement and state when each is the right tool
Explain how proxy voting and shareholder proposals convert engagement dialogue into measurable outcomes
Rank five escalation tactics from least to most confrontational and predict the reputational cost of each
Your checkpoint
An engagement plan with a one-page letter and a proxy-voting decision log of 10 fictional resolutions
Investment Mandates, Portfolio Analytics, and Client Reporting & ESG Analysis, Valuation, and Integration
Complete a full-length timed mock on mandates/reporting and analysis/valuation, tagging every miss by root cause (knowledge, application, misreading)
Re-derive from memory the valuation adjustment chain for each item missed in the mock
Rewrite three missed mandate or reporting questions from scratch and answer them cold
Consolidate the formulas used in valuation adjustment and portfolio ESG metrics onto a single reference sheet
Your checkpoint
An error log with at least 20 tagged entries and a 75%+ score on a re-attempt of the missed items
ESG Integrated Portfolio Construction and Management & Engagement and Stewardship
Design two portfolios under contrasting mandates (exclusion-based versus integration-based) and document the construction trade-offs
Quantify how a binding ESG constraint changes sector weights, concentration, and turnover in each design
Match stewardship and engagement evidence to the portfolio-construction decisions it would justify
Build a client-facing narrative that defends an ESG portfolio's active risk using engagement outcomes rather than screens
Your checkpoint
A portfolio construction pack: two approved designs, one constraint-impact table, and a one-page client narrative
Introduction to ESG & The ESG Market
Cold-recall a 60-term glossary spanning all nine domains, marking any term recalled imprecisely
Revisit early-domain material (introduction to ESG, the ESG market) that has aged the longest since first pass
Sit a final full-length timed mock under exam conditions and compare the score to the week 6 baseline
Distill the top 15 recurring error patterns into a single pre-exam checklist
Your checkpoint
A final mock score at or above 75%, plus a one-page pre-exam checklist of recurring errors
Milestones
Week 2: Both heaviest-domain weeks are done: the mandate/reporting template exists and the integration memo shows a valuation table with two scenarios; a 25-question quiz is scored and logged
Week 4: All eight content domains have a written artifact; an error log exists with at least 10 tagged entries and no domain is untouched
Week 6: First full-length mock completed under time; score recorded as a baseline, root-cause tagging done for every miss, and a 75%+ re-attempt on missed items
Week 8: Final mock scored at or above 75% and the pre-exam checklist of recurring errors is complete, covering all nine domains