CFP Certification (Australia) study materials
CFP Certification (Australia) study resources

CFP Certification (Australia) study plan

CFP Certification (Australia) · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Map the FPSB technical knowledge areas against your own confidence, scoring each area 1-5 and ranking them by gap size

  • Draft a one-page formula and definition sheet for the financial planning process and the adviser's regulatory and ethical obligations

  • Explain aloud, without notes, how the six-step financial planning process links to the FPSB practice standards

  • Complete 30 practice questions drawn only from planning-process and regulatory topics and log every error with its cause

Your checkpoint

A dated confidence-gap matrix covering every technical knowledge area plus an error log of at least 30 attempted questions

Week 2

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Build a tax calculation template covering marginal rates, Medicare levy and surcharge thresholds, and offsets, then test it on three worked scenarios

  • Compare the tax treatment of superannuation contributions, earnings, and benefits in accumulation versus retirement phase

  • Distinguish CGT events, cost-base rules, and the main exemptions and concessions using your own summary table

  • Solve 25 tax and superannuation calculation problems under timed conditions of 90 seconds each

Your checkpoint

A verified tax and superannuation calculation template with three completed worked examples and a scored 25-question timed set

Week 3

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Construct a superannuation strategy comparison for three client profiles covering contribution caps, Division 293, and preservation rules

  • Model a retirement income projection using an account-based pension and the minimum drawdown schedule

  • Identify the advice implications of the transfer balance cap and total superannuation balance thresholds in at least four scenarios

  • Summarise the social security means-testing treatment of superannuation assets and income in your own words

Your checkpoint

Three written superannuation and retirement advice summaries, each with calculations, that you can defend in a peer discussion

Week 4

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Analyse the risk insurance needs of three client profiles using an needs-based capital calculation

  • Compare life, TPD, trauma, and income protection policies on definitions, exclusions, and ownership and tax treatment

  • Explain the interaction between insurance inside and outside superannuation, including fund trustee obligations

  • Complete a 40-question mixed set spanning tax, superannuation, and insurance and record your accuracy by area

Your checkpoint

A mid-point mock assessment of 40 questions with a written analysis of every area scoring below 70 percent

Week 5

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Evaluate investment options using risk, return, liquidity, and diversification criteria across the major asset classes

  • Apply portfolio theory concepts, including correlation and diversification, to two constructed client portfolios

  • Interpret performance and risk measures such as standard deviation, Sharpe ratio, and duration in plain language for a client

  • Distinguish the regulatory obligations attached to managed investment schemes and direct equities

Your checkpoint

A two-portfolio investment recommendation memo with stated assumptions, risk metrics, and a plain-language client explanation

Week 6

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Build an estate planning checklist covering wills, intestacy, powers of attorney, binding nominations, and testamentary trusts

  • Analyse the estate planning consequences of superannuation death benefits across at least four beneficiary scenarios

  • Compare ownership structures, including joint tenancy and tenancy in common, for their estate and tax outcomes

  • Draft a referral note identifying when an adviser must escalate to a solicitor or specialist

Your checkpoint

An estate planning decision tree covering superannuation death benefits, ownership structures, and escalation triggers

Week 7

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Integrate technical knowledge into a full written Statement of Advice for one complex client scenario

  • Apply the best-interests duty and conflicted-remuneration rules to justify each recommendation in that advice

  • Stress-test your advice against three changed circumstances, such as redundancy or illness, and revise the recommendations

  • Peer-review one other candidate's advice document against a checklist you construct yourself

Your checkpoint

A complete Statement of Advice for a complex scenario, plus a peer-review checklist and a log of revisions made

Week 8

Financial Planning Standards Board knowledge domains (technical knowledge areas)

  • Sit two full-length timed practice exams under exam conditions and record accuracy by technical area

  • Re-teach your three weakest areas from memory using a blank page and then verify against source material

  • Consolidate your formula, threshold, and definition sheet into a final one-page revision aid

  • Plan your exam-day time allocation and question-skipping strategy based on your practice-exam pacing data

Your checkpoint

Two scored full-length practice exams with a by-area accuracy report and a finalised one-page revision aid

Milestones

Week 4: Score at least 65 percent on the 40-question mixed mock, with no single technical area below 50 percent

Week 6: Complete the estate planning decision tree and correctly answer at least 8 of 10 scenario questions on death benefits and ownership structures

Week 8: Score at least 75 percent on both full-length practice exams and show improvement in every area previously below 70 percent