CHP-SW study materials
CHP-SW study resources

Caregiver Collapse, Home Safety, and Patient Self-Determination in Heart Failure

CHP-SW · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Caregiver Collapse, Home Safety, and Patient Self-Determination in Heart Failure

Mr. and Mrs. P are 79 and 76. Mr. P has NYHA class IV heart failure, dyspnea at rest, and two hospitalizations in three months. He wants to stay home 'until the end.' Mrs. P has mild cognitive impairment and manages his 14 medications, but she has stopped cooking, has lost 8 lb, and says, 'I can't do this anymore.' Their home has a bedroom and bathroom on the first floor, but the front steps are broken and there is no ramp. Mr. P has no DNR order and says, 'I'm not ready for that.' Mrs. P has not attended her own medical appointments in a year. The couple has limited savings and no long-term-care insurance; a daughter lives 90 minutes away and visits every other weekend. The hospice team asks you to assess caregiver safety, patient self-determination, and discharge planning.

1. How do you assess the caregiver's capacity and the patient's safety without overriding his self-determination?

Read the worked answer

I would assess Mrs. P with a caregiver burden measure, a depression screen, and a cognitive screen because she has MCI. I would ask concrete questions: who cooks, who manages the 14 medications, who helps at night, and what happens if she falls. I would assess home safety: broken steps, no ramp, bathroom access, food in the house, and emergency plan. For Mr. P, I would assess capacity to understand the risks of staying home. Self-determination means he can refuse placement, but it does not obligate his wife to provide unsafe care. I would separate his choice to remain home from her choice to continue caregiving. I would screen for elder mistreatment and self-neglect and report if criteria are met. The judgment is to respect autonomy while naming the caregiver's collapse as a patient-safety issue.

2. What options and supports would you propose, and how would you prioritize them?

Read the worked answer

I would prioritize immediate safety and caregiver relief: repair the steps or install a ramp through community resources, arrange a home health aide, respite, meal delivery, medication management, and a personal emergency response system. I would discuss hospice versus palliative home care and clarify the DNR gently, without pressure. If Mrs. P cannot continue, options include the daughter moving in temporarily, paid care, assisted living, or skilled nursing. I would provide financial counseling about Medicaid waiver, VA benefits if eligible, and local grants. I would hold a family meeting with the daughter by phone. I would treat Mrs. P's depression and help her re-engage with her own medical care. The least restrictive option that meets both patients' needs is the goal. I would not frame placement as failure.

3. What if Mr. P refuses all options and Mrs. P says she will stop helping?

Read the worked answer

If Mr. P refuses all options and Mrs. P says she will stop helping, I would assess for imminent risk: food, medication, shelter, and medical care. If he has capacity, he can accept risks, but the team should not coerce him. I would offer emergency respite and a trial of increased services. If he becomes unsafe and his wife withdraws, this may meet self-neglect or endangerment criteria; I would report to adult protective services and seek legal guidance for emergency placement only as a last resort. I would document capacity, risks, options offered, and his choices. I would support Mrs. P's right to say no and connect her with counseling. An ethics consult can help the team navigate the conflict between autonomy and safety. The social worker should not abandon either patient.