Grandparents' Outright Bequest to a Grandson on SSI
Daniel is 22 and has cerebral palsy. He receives $967 per month in SSI and Medicaid and lives with his parents. His grandfather died last month. The will, drafted 12 years ago, leaves Daniel $150,000 outright; there is no trust. Daniel's grandmother is executor and wants to distribute the money promptly. Daniel has no guardian, but his parents help him with finances. The family worries that the inheritance will end his SSI and Medicaid. The will names Daniel's two cousins as contingent beneficiaries. A local pooled trust accepts first-party funds and charges a 6% joinder fee plus annual administration. Daniel's parents could establish a first-party special needs trust, but they have heard it must contain a Medicaid payback. Daniel's mother asks whether he can simply disclaim the inheritance, whether the will can be changed, and whether the money can go into a trust after he receives it.
1. Analyze Daniel's options if the $150,000 is distributed outright. What will happen to his SSI and Medicaid, and what immediate risks must be managed?
Read the worked answer
If Daniel receives $150,000 outright, SSI will treat it as income in the month received and as a resource the next month. The SSI resource limit is $2,000, so his $967 monthly benefit will stop once the money is received, and Medicaid may stop in states where SSI automatically confers Medicaid. He could spend the money on permitted goods or services, but giving it away can cause a transfer-of-resources penalty and does not solve the long-term issue. The immediate risk is losing Medicaid coverage for needed care and having no trust structure. A spend-down on a prepaid funeral, home modifications, or debt may be allowed, but it must be for his benefit and documented. The better route is to prevent outright receipt if possible. If distribution is imminent, the family needs a special needs trust drafted and funded correctly before or at distribution, and it should confirm the trust meets SSI and Medicaid requirements.
2. Compare a first-party special needs trust, a pooled trust subaccount, and a qualified disclaimer. Include control, payback, and timing.
Read the worked answer
The three options differ. A first-party special needs trust is funded with Daniel's own inheritance, must be established by a parent, grandparent, guardian, or court, and must contain a Medicaid payback on death. It can preserve SSI and Medicaid while holding the $150,000 for supplemental needs. A pooled trust subaccount is also first-party, requires a joinder agreement, pools investment, and also has a payback, but the charity may retain a remainder; the 6% fee and annual costs matter. A qualified disclaimer would pass Daniel's share to the cousins, avoiding receipt entirely, but it must be timely and valid under state law, and Daniel gets no benefit. A will reformation may be possible if there is clear mistake, but it is not guaranteed. The judgment is between preserving money for Daniel with payback and control, versus giving it away to cousins with no payback. For a 22-year-old with lifetime needs, a first-party or pooled trust is usually worth the payback cost.
3. What should the grandmother and parents do now regarding the estate plan and the cousins?
Read the worked answer
Grandmother should not distribute until the trust or disclaimer decision is made. She should ask the probate court about reformation if the will's mistake is clear, or coordinate with counsel to establish a first-party special needs trust before distribution. She should update her own estate plan to use a third-party special needs trust for Daniel and to avoid outright gifts to him; the cousins can remain contingent beneficiaries or receive other assets. The parents should review their wills and beneficiary designations to name the trust, not Daniel individually. They should also write a letter of intent and choose a successor trustee. The cousins should be told that the family is trying to preserve Daniel's benefits, not to disinherit them. Any legal fees should be weighed against the $150,000 and the value of continued Medicaid.