CIMA F3 study plan
CIMA F3 · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Financial strategy formulation & Financing decisions and capital structure
Map the F3 syllabus into a one-page matrix linking each learning outcome to the four exam domains, then rank topics by your current confidence
Explain how financial strategy translates corporate objectives into funding, dividend and investment policies, writing a 150-word summary from memory
Distinguish debt versus equity financing trade-offs by building a comparison table covering cost, control, tax shield and covenant constraints
Compute a company's weighted average cost of capital from a given set of market values and after-tax costs, showing every step
Your checkpoint
A one-page syllabus-to-domain matrix plus a worked WACC calculation scoring at least 80% against the model answer
Financing decisions and capital structure
Derive the after-tax cost of debt, cost of preference shares and cost of equity using both the dividend growth model and CAPM, and reconcile differences between the two equity estimates
Apply Modigliani-Miller propositions with and without tax to evaluate how gearing changes firm value, and state the assumptions that break down in practice
Calculate and interpret financial and operating gearing ratios and explain their effect on shareholder risk and the cost of capital
Evaluate dividend policy theories (residual, clientele, signalling) and recommend a payout approach for a stated scenario
Your checkpoint
A 20-question self-test on cost of capital and gearing scored and error-logged, with every wrong answer rewritten as a correct rule
Financing decisions and capital structure & Investment appraisal and risk
Assess financing choices for a growth scenario, weighing rights issues, bond issuance and lease versus buy, and justify a recommendation in 200 words
Compute NPV, IRR, payback and discounted payback for a multi-year project with tax depreciation and working capital changes
Explain the limitations of IRR (multiple roots, ranking conflicts, reinvestment assumption) and when NPV should override it
Identify relevant versus sunk or allocated costs in an appraisal and adjust a cash flow forecast accordingly
Your checkpoint
A full investment appraisal spreadsheet for one project, including sensitivity table, with a written recommendation of 200 words
Investment appraisal and risk
Apply risk-adjusted discount rates and certainty-equivalent methods to the same project and explain why the two approaches can rank projects differently
Perform scenario and sensitivity analysis on a project's NPV, identifying the break-even value of each key variable
Explain how portfolio theory and the capital asset pricing model inform project-specific discount rates, including the use of asset beta and regearing
Evaluate real options (deferral, expansion, abandonment) qualitatively and describe when option value justifies accepting a negative-NPV base case
Your checkpoint
A written risk appraisal of one project covering sensitivity, scenario and real-option analysis, marked against a self-built checklist of at least 10 criteria
Business valuation and corporate restructuring
Value a company using net asset, dividend valuation, price-earnings and discounted free cash flow methods, then explain the divergence between the resulting figures
Estimate an appropriate cost of equity and terminal growth rate for a valuation and justify each assumption
Adjust comparable company multiples for differences in growth, gearing and accounting policy
Explain the efficient market hypothesis and its implications for whether acquisitions create value
Your checkpoint
A valuation report valuing one listed-style company by at least three methods, with a reasoned range and a single point estimate
Business valuation and corporate restructuring & Financial strategy formulation
Evaluate merger and acquisition motives and assess synergy, including estimating the gain and how it should be split between acquirer and target shareholders
Compare cash, share-for-share and mixed consideration from the perspective of both sets of shareholders, calculating post-merger EPS and ownership dilution
Appraise defence tactics against a hostile bid and judge their likely effect on shareholder value
Assess divestment, demerger and management buyout options against stated strategic objectives
Your checkpoint
A one-page acquisition case memo recommending consideration mix, with supporting EPS and ownership calculations
Financial strategy formulation & Financing decisions and capital structure & Investment appraisal and risk & Business valuation and corporate restructuring
Complete a timed 90-minute mixed mock covering all four domains and record the score per domain
Re-teach your three weakest topics from memory in written form, then check against source material and correct gaps
Practise constructing concise written answers to discursive requirements, keeping to the verb and the mark allocation
Refine your formula sheet to a single page you can reproduce from memory
Your checkpoint
Mock score of at least 65% overall with a prioritised list of the five weakest topics and a remediation action for each
Financial strategy formulation & Financing decisions and capital structure & Investment appraisal and risk & Business valuation and corporate restructuring
Complete a second full timed mock under exam conditions and compare domain scores with week 7
Close every remaining gap on the week 7 remediation list and re-test each topic
Rehearse the reproduced formula sheet and recalculate two full numerical questions without notes
Plan exam-day time allocation across sections and rehearse a strategy for questions you cannot finish
Your checkpoint
Second mock score at or above 70% with all week 7 remediation items evidenced as closed
Milestones
Week 2: Can compute WACC, cost of equity by two methods and gearing ratios unaided, and explain MM propositions with and without tax
Week 4: Can run a complete NPV appraisal with tax, working capital and sensitivity analysis, and justify a recommendation in writing
Week 6: Can value a company by three methods and produce a defensible acquisition consideration recommendation with EPS workings
Week 8: Two timed mocks completed, second at or above 70%, with all identified weak topics re-tested and closed