Cisco 300-220 CBRTHD study materials
Cisco 300-220 CBRTHD study resources

Cisco 300-220 CBRTHD study plan

Cisco 300-220 CBRTHD · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Security Monitoring

  • Map the security monitoring domain objectives into a checklist of specific telemetry sources (endpoint, network, DNS, proxy, authentication) and the detection use case each one supports

  • Differentiate signature-based, anomaly-based, and behavioral detection by writing one realistic example of each and stating what each misses

  • Trace a single simulated event from raw log line to alert to analyst triage decision, documenting each handoff

  • Configure a free SIEM or log collector to ingest at least two log sources and confirm events are searchable

Your checkpoint

A one-page detection coverage matrix listing at least 8 telemetry sources, the use case each supports, and the blind spot it leaves, plus a screenshot or export proving two log sources are ingested and searchable

Week 2

Security Monitoring

  • Write and test at least three correlation or threshold rules against the ingested logs, including one rule that produces a false positive you must then tune

  • Classify a set of sample alerts by severity using an explicit impact-and-confidence rubric you define

  • Build a triage runbook for one alert type with escalation criteria, evidence to collect, and containment triggers

  • Explain how alert fatigue and tuning decisions affect detection quality, using your own false-positive result as evidence

Your checkpoint

A triage runbook for one alert type plus a tuning log showing rule before/after and the measured change in alert volume

Week 3

Security Concepts

  • Compare symmetric and asymmetric cryptography and identify where each appears in TLS, VPN, and credential storage

  • Walk through a TLS handshake and state what each certificate field proves and what it does not prove

  • Contrast authentication factors and describe how MFA defeats credential replay but not real-time phishing proxies

  • Diagram a defense-in-depth architecture for a small enterprise and label where each security concept (confidentiality, integrity, availability, non-repudiation) is enforced

Your checkpoint

An annotated architecture diagram with at least 10 labeled controls, each mapped to the threat it mitigates and the security principle it enforces

Week 4

Security Concepts & Host-Based Analysis

  • Identify common endpoint artifacts (process trees, autoruns, scheduled tasks, services, WMI subscriptions) and state which attack technique each would reveal

  • Analyze a process tree from a benign and a suspicious parent-child relationship and justify the verdict with evidence

  • Explain how fileless and living-off-the-land techniques evade signature detection and which artifacts remain

  • Apply a structured host triage sequence (volatile first, then disk) to a sample scenario and justify the ordering

Your checkpoint

A host triage worksheet with the ordered artifact collection checklist and two worked process-tree analyses, one benign and one suspicious, each with a written verdict and supporting evidence

Week 5

Host-Based Analysis

  • Interpret Windows event log IDs relevant to logon, privilege use, service creation, and process creation, and state the normal baseline for each

  • Correlate a suspicious logon event with a process creation event to reconstruct a short intrusion narrative

  • Examine persistence mechanisms across registry, services, and scheduled tasks and rank them by stealth

  • Distinguish malware categories by behavior and artifact footprint rather than by name

Your checkpoint

A written intrusion narrative reconstructed from at least six correlated host events, with a timeline and an explicit statement of what remains uncertain

Week 6

Network Intrusion Analysis

  • Read a packet capture and identify protocol anomalies in DNS, HTTP, and TLS without relying on payload decryption

  • Recognize beaconing behavior by computing or estimating interval regularity and jitter across a flow set

  • Map network evidence to intrusion phases and identify which phase a given flow set most likely represents

  • Differentiate scanning, exploitation, and exfiltration patterns by their traffic shape and volume characteristics

Your checkpoint

A network intrusion analysis report on a supplied or self-captured PCAP covering at least three findings, each with supporting flow evidence and a confidence rating

Week 7

Network Intrusion Analysis & Security Policies and Procedures

  • Compare IDS and IPS placement decisions and state the tradeoff each placement makes between visibility and enforcement

  • Draft an incident response policy section covering severity classification, notification timelines, and evidence handling

  • Sequence the phases of incident response and identify the decision point where each phase can fail

  • Explain chain of custody and describe how a handling mistake can render evidence unusable

Your checkpoint

A two-page incident response policy excerpt with severity tiers, notification timelines, evidence handling rules, and a phase-by-phase failure-mode table

Week 8

Security Policies and Procedures & Security Concepts & Security Monitoring & Host-Based Analysis & Network Intrusion Analysis

  • Audit your own weak areas across all five domains using missed practice questions and rank them by frequency

  • Re-derive the three most-missed concepts from first principles without notes

  • Complete a timed mixed-domain practice set and record per-domain accuracy

  • Build a one-page personal reference sheet of facts you repeatedly forget, limited to items you have verified

Your checkpoint

A timed practice score report with per-domain accuracy, a ranked weak-area list, and a verified one-page reference sheet

Milestones

Week 2: You can explain, without notes, how a log line becomes a tuned alert, and you have a working rule set with measured false-positive reduction

Week 4: You can walk through a TLS handshake, map controls to security principles, and complete a host triage sequence in the correct order with justification

Week 6: You can identify beaconing and protocol anomalies from flow data alone and place each finding into an intrusion phase

Week 8: Timed mixed-domain practice shows at least 80 percent accuracy overall with no single domain below 70 percent