Cisco 300-220 CBRTHD study plan
Cisco 300-220 CBRTHD · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Security Monitoring
Map the security monitoring domain objectives into a checklist of specific telemetry sources (endpoint, network, DNS, proxy, authentication) and the detection use case each one supports
Differentiate signature-based, anomaly-based, and behavioral detection by writing one realistic example of each and stating what each misses
Trace a single simulated event from raw log line to alert to analyst triage decision, documenting each handoff
Configure a free SIEM or log collector to ingest at least two log sources and confirm events are searchable
Your checkpoint
A one-page detection coverage matrix listing at least 8 telemetry sources, the use case each supports, and the blind spot it leaves, plus a screenshot or export proving two log sources are ingested and searchable
Security Monitoring
Write and test at least three correlation or threshold rules against the ingested logs, including one rule that produces a false positive you must then tune
Classify a set of sample alerts by severity using an explicit impact-and-confidence rubric you define
Build a triage runbook for one alert type with escalation criteria, evidence to collect, and containment triggers
Explain how alert fatigue and tuning decisions affect detection quality, using your own false-positive result as evidence
Your checkpoint
A triage runbook for one alert type plus a tuning log showing rule before/after and the measured change in alert volume
Security Concepts
Compare symmetric and asymmetric cryptography and identify where each appears in TLS, VPN, and credential storage
Walk through a TLS handshake and state what each certificate field proves and what it does not prove
Contrast authentication factors and describe how MFA defeats credential replay but not real-time phishing proxies
Diagram a defense-in-depth architecture for a small enterprise and label where each security concept (confidentiality, integrity, availability, non-repudiation) is enforced
Your checkpoint
An annotated architecture diagram with at least 10 labeled controls, each mapped to the threat it mitigates and the security principle it enforces
Security Concepts & Host-Based Analysis
Identify common endpoint artifacts (process trees, autoruns, scheduled tasks, services, WMI subscriptions) and state which attack technique each would reveal
Analyze a process tree from a benign and a suspicious parent-child relationship and justify the verdict with evidence
Explain how fileless and living-off-the-land techniques evade signature detection and which artifacts remain
Apply a structured host triage sequence (volatile first, then disk) to a sample scenario and justify the ordering
Your checkpoint
A host triage worksheet with the ordered artifact collection checklist and two worked process-tree analyses, one benign and one suspicious, each with a written verdict and supporting evidence
Host-Based Analysis
Interpret Windows event log IDs relevant to logon, privilege use, service creation, and process creation, and state the normal baseline for each
Correlate a suspicious logon event with a process creation event to reconstruct a short intrusion narrative
Examine persistence mechanisms across registry, services, and scheduled tasks and rank them by stealth
Distinguish malware categories by behavior and artifact footprint rather than by name
Your checkpoint
A written intrusion narrative reconstructed from at least six correlated host events, with a timeline and an explicit statement of what remains uncertain
Network Intrusion Analysis
Read a packet capture and identify protocol anomalies in DNS, HTTP, and TLS without relying on payload decryption
Recognize beaconing behavior by computing or estimating interval regularity and jitter across a flow set
Map network evidence to intrusion phases and identify which phase a given flow set most likely represents
Differentiate scanning, exploitation, and exfiltration patterns by their traffic shape and volume characteristics
Your checkpoint
A network intrusion analysis report on a supplied or self-captured PCAP covering at least three findings, each with supporting flow evidence and a confidence rating
Network Intrusion Analysis & Security Policies and Procedures
Compare IDS and IPS placement decisions and state the tradeoff each placement makes between visibility and enforcement
Draft an incident response policy section covering severity classification, notification timelines, and evidence handling
Sequence the phases of incident response and identify the decision point where each phase can fail
Explain chain of custody and describe how a handling mistake can render evidence unusable
Your checkpoint
A two-page incident response policy excerpt with severity tiers, notification timelines, evidence handling rules, and a phase-by-phase failure-mode table
Security Policies and Procedures & Security Concepts & Security Monitoring & Host-Based Analysis & Network Intrusion Analysis
Audit your own weak areas across all five domains using missed practice questions and rank them by frequency
Re-derive the three most-missed concepts from first principles without notes
Complete a timed mixed-domain practice set and record per-domain accuracy
Build a one-page personal reference sheet of facts you repeatedly forget, limited to items you have verified
Your checkpoint
A timed practice score report with per-domain accuracy, a ranked weak-area list, and a verified one-page reference sheet
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain, without notes, how a log line becomes a tuned alert, and you have a working rule set with measured false-positive reduction
Week 4: You can walk through a TLS handshake, map controls to security principles, and complete a host triage sequence in the correct order with justification
Week 6: You can identify beaconing and protocol anomalies from flow data alone and place each finding into an intrusion phase
Week 8: Timed mixed-domain practice shows at least 80 percent accuracy overall with no single domain below 70 percent