Cisco SPCOR 350-501 study materials
Cisco SPCOR 350-501 study resources

Cisco SPCOR 350-501 study plan

Cisco SPCOR 350-501 · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Networking

  • Configure and verify OSPFv2 multi-area adjacencies, including ABR/ASBR roles, virtual links, and LSA type filtering on a three-router lab.

  • Design and validate a BGP peering topology with eBGP and iBGP neighbors, route reflectors, and prefix-list/route-map policy enforcement.

  • Compare IS-IS Level 1/Level 2 behavior and configure a basic multi-level IS-IS domain to observe L1-to-L2 redistribution.

  • Troubleshoot a broken OSPF neighbor adjacency and a BGP session stuck in Active/Idle using show/debug output only.

Your checkpoint

A written lab report with topology diagram, show-command captures, and a one-page root-cause analysis for each of the two injected faults.

Week 2

Networking

  • Implement and compare MPLS L3VPN, VRF-lite, and route leaking between VRFs on a service-provider edge topology.

  • Configure segment routing (SR-MPLS) with an IGP, verify prefix and adjacency SID behavior, and compare it with LDP-based label distribution.

  • Build a multicast distribution tree using PIM-SM with a rendezvous point and verify source registration and SPT switchover.

  • Apply QoS classification, marking, and queuing policies on provider edge interfaces and measure their effect on a simulated voice stream.

Your checkpoint

A working multi-VRF topology with a verification checklist (20+ checks) covering VPN label imposition, SR SID reachability, PIM state, and QoS counters.

Week 3

MPLS

  • Configure LDP and RSVP-TE label-switched paths, then compare their signaling, path control, and failure behavior.

  • Implement MPLS Traffic Engineering with explicit paths, affinity constraints, and fast reroute (FRR) protection.

  • Deploy an L3VPN using MP-BGP with route targets, verify VRF route import/export, and test customer route isolation.

  • Diagnose a label mismatch and a PHP (penultimate hop popping) issue using label stack traces and MPLS OAM commands.

Your checkpoint

A comparative table plus lab evidence showing LDP vs. RSVP-TE vs. SR-MPLS path setup, failover timing, and label stack depth for the same topology.

Week 4

MPLS & Architecture

  • Explain and configure inter-AS VPN options A, B, and C on a two-carrier topology, documenting the control-plane differences.

  • Design a hierarchical network architecture using Cisco valid design principles (core/distribution/access, modularity, summarization boundaries).

  • Configure MPLS L2VPN (AToM) and VPLS pseudowires and verify MAC learning and split-horizon behavior.

  • Evaluate high-availability design choices (NSF/SSO, BFD, TI-LFA) and select the appropriate mechanism for three stated failure scenarios.

Your checkpoint

An architecture decision record (ADR) of 800+ words covering inter-AS option choice, HA mechanism selection, and L2VPN design, with supporting lab output.

Week 5

Services

  • Configure and verify a full-featured branch: DHCP, NAT/PAT, PPPoE, and QoS on a single router.

  • Implement a site-to-site IPsec VPN and a DMVPN Phase 3 hub-and-spoke topology, then compare scalability and encryption behavior.

  • Configure a GRE tunnel and a VTI, and explain when each is preferred over the other in a service-provider context.

  • Apply SNMP, Syslog, and NetFlow on a service edge and validate that telemetry records reach a collector.

Your checkpoint

A branch-services runbook with configuration snippets and a verification matrix confirming each service (DHCP, NAT, IPsec, DMVPN, telemetry) works end to end.

Week 6

Services & Architecture

  • Deploy Cisco SD-WAN control-plane and data-plane components in a lab (vManage, vSmart, vBond, vEdge/cEdge) and verify overlay tunnel establishment.

  • Configure SD-WAN application-aware routing and a localized data policy, then observe path selection changes under an injected latency condition.

  • Describe Cisco SD-Access fabric roles (control plane, border, edge) and configure a basic fabric site in a simulated environment.

  • Map a stated enterprise requirement to an SD-WAN vs. SD-Access vs. traditional WAN design, justifying the choice.

Your checkpoint

A design comparison document (600+ words) with lab screenshots of SD-WAN overlay and fabric states, plus a justified recommendation for the stated requirement.

Week 7

Automation and Assurance

  • Write and run Python scripts using NETCONF/RESTCONF and YANG models to retrieve and modify device configuration.

  • Build an Ansible playbook that pushes a standardized interface configuration to three devices and reports idempotency.

  • Use model-driven telemetry (gNMI/gRPC) to stream interface counters to a collector and visualize the data.

  • Automate a compliance check that compares running configuration against a golden template and flags drift.

Your checkpoint

A Git repository containing a Python script, an Ansible playbook, and a telemetry collector config, with a README showing successful execution output for each.

Week 8

Automation and Assurance & Architecture & Networking

  • Integrate assurance tooling (Cisco DNA Center or equivalent) to run a health check and interpret assurance findings for a lab network.

  • Design an automation and assurance architecture that covers configuration management, telemetry, and closed-loop remediation for a stated scenario.

  • Complete two timed full-length practice exams and score each domain to identify remaining gaps.

  • Re-mediate the two weakest domains with targeted labs and document the fix for each missed objective.

Your checkpoint

A personal gap-analysis spreadsheet with practice-exam scores by domain, remediation notes, and a final one-page architecture summary tying automation and assurance to the overall design.

Milestones

Week 2: Can configure, verify, and troubleshoot OSPF, BGP, IS-IS, MPLS L3VPN, SR-MPLS, PIM-SM, and QoS from memory in a lab, with a completed verification checklist and no unresolved faults.

Week 4: Can explain and demonstrate LDP vs. RSVP-TE vs. SR-MPLS, inter-AS options A/B/C, and HA mechanism selection, supported by the comparative table and ADR.

Week 6: Can deploy branch services (DHCP, NAT, IPsec, DMVPN, telemetry) and SD-WAN/SD-Access fabric components end to end, with runbook and design comparison complete.

Week 8: Scores at or above 80% on both timed practice exams, with every domain at or above 70% and a documented remediation plan for any remaining weak area.