Meridian Components: Matching a Competitor's Price Cut
Meridian Components makes a proprietary hydraulic manifold sold to original equipment manufacturers at $220 per unit. Variable cost is $132; fixed costs are $4.2 million annually. Current volume is 90,000 units. A low-cost Asian competitor has entered with a comparable manifold at $185 and has won two mid-sized accounts. Meridian's largest customer, representing 30,000 units, has asked for a price match to $185 or will put the business out to bid. Meridian's sales vice president wants to match on all volume to protect share. The CFO notes that a $35 cut on all 90,000 units would reduce contribution by $3.15 million. The company has 15% excess capacity and a patent on a leak-reducing seal that lowers OEM warranty costs by an estimated $18 per unit. OEM purchasing managers weight price 50%, quality 25%, service 15%, and warranty 10%.
1. Calculate contribution and profit under three options: match all volume at $185, match only the largest customer at $185, and refuse and lose the largest customer. Which is financially best in the short run?
Read the worked answer
At $220, unit contribution is $220 minus $132, or $88. Current total contribution is 90,000 times $88, or $7.92 million; profit is $7.92 million minus $4.2 million, or $3.72 million. If Meridian matches all volume at $185, unit contribution is $53. Total contribution is 90,000 times $53, or $4.77 million; profit is $0.57 million. If it matches only the largest customer, contribution is 30,000 times $53, or $1.59 million, plus 60,000 times $88, or $5.28 million; total contribution is $6.87 million and profit is $2.67 million. If it refuses and loses the customer, contribution is 60,000 times $88, or $5.28 million; profit is $1.08 million. Selective matching is therefore the best short-run option, assuming the concession does not spread to other customers. Matching all volume destroys $3.15 million of contribution relative to the current price.
2. Recommend a pricing strategy, including how to use the seal patent and how to prevent the concession from eroding list prices across the market.
Read the worked answer
Meridian should make a selective, private concession to the largest customer rather than a public list-price cut. The seal lowers warranty cost by about $18 per unit, so the competitor's $185 price carries a higher effective cost to the OEM. Meridian can argue that $195 with the seal is a better total cost than $185 without it. The concession should be structured as an off-invoice rebate or a volume-tiered contract, not a new published list price, to limit reference-price erosion. Conditions should include a volume commitment, a multiyear term, and no most-favored-customer clause that automatically extends the price to others. If the customer insists on $185, Meridian should accept only with a service or warranty bundle and a clear firewall separating this account from smaller OEMs. The company should also prepare a value calculator showing warranty, downtime, and quality costs.
3. Explain how price elasticity and customer segmentation should guide whether Meridian matches the competitor across its customer base.
Read the worked answer
The largest customer is likely more price-elastic because it has 30,000 units, professional purchasing staff, and a credible alternative. Smaller OEMs may be less elastic if they value the seal, service, and switching-cost avoidance. A uniform price cut gives away contribution on customers who would have stayed at $220. Meridian should segment by price sensitivity and switching cost, then fence offers: volume tiers, private rebates, service contracts, and warranty bundles. It should estimate how many smaller customers would actually switch before extending the $185 price. If the competitor's product is comparable but lacks the seal, Meridian's differentiation supports a price premium. The key risk is contagion: if one customer's $185 becomes known, other buyers will demand it. Selective pricing works only with contractual confidentiality and disciplined sales rules. The decision is not whether to match everywhere, but where matching retains profitable volume without resetting the market price.