CMD study materials
CMD study resources

Spinal Cord Re-Irradiation After Prior Palliative Radiotherapy

CMD · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Spinal Cord Re-Irradiation After Prior Palliative Radiotherapy

A 63-year-old man with metastatic NSCLC, prior palliative radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions to T4-T6 14 months ago for bone metastasis, now presents with new T7-T8 spinal cord compression, ESCC grade 2, severe pain, and inability to walk. MRI shows cord compression at T7-T8. He has 4-month expected survival, ECOG 2, and is on dexamethasone. The team considers 8 Gy in 1 fraction versus 20 Gy in 5 fractions to T7-T8, but the prior T6 field overlaps the new field by 1 cm. The prior plan had spinal cord Dmax 32 Gy. The cumulative spinal cord dose is unknown. He has thrombocytopenia (platelets 70,000/µL) and a history of peptic ulcer disease. He is not a surgical candidate, and his pain is poorly controlled with opioids.

1. Calculate the EQD2 for the prior course and for each proposed regimen using an α/β of 2 Gy for spinal cord, and interpret the cumulative risk.

Read the worked answer

Using α/β = 2 Gy for spinal cord: EQD2 = total dose × (d + α/β)/(2 + α/β). Prior 30 Gy/10: d = 3 Gy, EQD2 = 30 × (3+2)/4 = 37.5 Gy. If the cord Dmax was 32 Gy, the cord maximum EQD2 is 32 × 5/4 = 40 Gy. Proposed 8 Gy/1: d = 8 Gy, EQD2 = 8 × (8+2)/4 = 20 Gy; cumulative with prescribed prior = 57.5 Gy (or 60 Gy using Dmax). Proposed 20 Gy/5: d = 4 Gy, EQD2 = 20 × (4+2)/4 = 30 Gy; cumulative = 67.5 Gy (or 70 Gy using Dmax). Both exceed the commonly cited cord tolerance of 50 Gy EQD2, and 20 Gy/5 exceeds it substantially. The overlap is only 1 cm, so the cumulative dose to the entire cord is not uniform; the highest risk is at the overlap. Still, the calculation shows that a second course is not radiobiologically trivial.

2. Given the overlap and performance status, which regimen would you recommend and why? Include what you would document and monitor.

Read the worked answer

Given ECOG 2, 4-month survival, poor pain control, thrombocytopenia, and prior high cord dose, I would recommend 8 Gy in 1 fraction to T7-T8 with careful image guidance and a sharp field edge at the overlap. The goal is rapid palliation, not long-term local control; single-fraction radiotherapy is effective for pain and cord compression in poor-prognosis patients and minimizes treatment burden. 20 Gy in 5 fractions would add 30 Gy EQD2 to a cord already at 37.5–40 Gy EQD2, raising myelopathy risk without a survival benefit. If the patient were a surgical candidate or had longer prognosis, decompression and stabilization plus 20 Gy/5 might be considered, but not here. Document the prior dose, overlap, EQD2 calculation, informed consent about myelopathy, dexamethasone taper, platelet count, and ulcer prophylaxis. Monitor neurologic function and pain; avoid NSAIDs.