Foundry Asset Group Impairment and Capitalized Maintenance
Vantage Castings Ltd. operates a single foundry asset group. At 31 December 20X5, the group's carrying amount is $4,200,000: building $1,500,000, furnace $2,100,000, and molds $600,000. A customer contract representing 35% of volume expires in March 20X6 and is not expected to renew, and the foundry has reported operating losses for two years. Management prepares a recoverability test using undiscounted net cash flows of $3,900,000 over the remaining eight-year life. The asset group's fair value is $3,100,000 and costs to sell are $150,000. Vantage uses straight-line depreciation with no residual value and originally estimated a 15-year life; six years remain. In prior years, Vantage capitalized $250,000 of routine maintenance on the furnace because the work extended its useful life by two years; the auditor has questioned this treatment. Goodwill of $400,000 is recorded at the parent-company level and is not allocated to the foundry asset group.
1. Apply the recoverability and impairment measurement rules to the foundry asset group. What is the impairment loss, and how is it allocated?
Read the worked answer
The contract loss and recurring operating losses are impairment indicators. The recoverability test compares the asset group's carrying amount with the undiscounted net cash flows. Carrying amount $4,200,000 exceeds undiscounted cash flows $3,900,000, so the group is impaired.
Measure the impairment using fair value less costs to sell: $3,100,000 - $150,000 = $2,950,000. Under US GAAP, that is the measurement; under IFRS, compare it with value in use and use the higher recoverable amount. No value in use is given, so $2,950,000 is used. Impairment loss = $4,200,000 - $2,950,000 = $1,250,000.
Allocate the loss pro rata to the carrying amounts because no individual fair values are given:
- Building: $1,500,000/$4,200,000 × $1,250,000 = $446,429
- Furnace: $2,100,000/$4,200,000 × $1,250,000 = $625,000
- Molds: $600,000/$4,200,000 × $1,250,000 = $178,571
New carrying amounts: building $1,053,571; furnace $1,475,000; molds $421,429. The allocation cannot reduce an asset below its individual fair value; if individual fair values were available, any excess would be reallocated to the other assets. Goodwill is not in the asset group, so it is not reduced here.
2. Evaluate the capitalized maintenance. How would a correction affect the impairment calculation and subsequent depreciation?
Read the worked answer
Routine maintenance is expensed unless it meets capitalization criteria, such as improving the asset, replacing a component, or extending useful life beyond the original estimate. The work extended life by two years, which can support capitalization if it was a major overhaul rather than routine upkeep. The label 'routine' and the auditor's challenge create doubt; if the work merely restored the furnace to its original condition, it should have been expensed.
If corrected, reduce the furnace and the asset group by the unamortized $250,000. Carrying amount becomes $3,950,000. The recoverability test still fails because $3,950,000 exceeds undiscounted cash flows of $3,900,000. Impairment becomes $3,950,000 - $2,950,000 = $1,000,000.
Allocate the $1,000,000 over adjusted carrying amounts totaling $3,950,000: building $379,747; furnace $468,354; molds $151,899. If the life extension was also improper, remaining life should be six years rather than eight, so post-impairment depreciation would be higher. A material prior-period error would require restatement, not just a current-period adjustment.
3. Explain how the parent-level goodwill should be tested and why it is excluded from the asset-group impairment.
Read the worked answer
Goodwill does not generate cash flows independently of other assets, so it is tested at the reporting-unit level, not at an individual asset group. The parent-level goodwill must be assigned to the reporting units that benefit from the synergies of the acquisition. The test compares each reporting unit's carrying amount, including assigned goodwill, with its fair value. If carrying amount exceeds fair value, an impairment loss is recognized, subject to the applicable ceiling.
Excluding the $400,000 goodwill from the foundry asset group is appropriate only if the foundry is not itself the reporting unit. If the foundry is the reporting unit, the goodwill must be included in that test. The asset-group impairment is a separate test triggered by the foundry's own indicators. The parent cannot conclude that goodwill is unimpaired merely because the foundry asset group passed or failed its test; it needs the reporting-unit fair value.