Under China's Comprehensive Registration-Based System (全面注册制), what is the core philosophy shift in the regulatory review of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) compared to the former approval-based system (核准制)?
- The review shifts from substantive merit-based profitability judgment (实质审查) to information-disclosure centered verification (以信息披露为核心) Correct answer.
- The review eliminates all statutory financial thresholds and allows unrestricted market-wide self-registration without exchange review
- The review grants the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) sole authority to conduct on-site physical engineering inspections while bypassing stock exchanges
- The review transfers final registration and listing approval powers entirely to the Securities Association of China (SAC)
Explanation
The registration system establishes information disclosure as the central pillar (以信息披露为核心). The issuer bears primary responsibility for truthful, accurate, and complete disclosure, and sponsors and other intermediaries perform their assigned verification duties. Exchanges conduct frontline issuance-and-listing review, while the CSRC makes the statutory registration decision and supervises the process. Regulatory review of disclosure compliance does not guarantee investment value or independently certify every statement as true.