Assistant Social Worker (China) key terms

Respect for a person dignity and worth without automatically approving harmful behavior, surrendering professional boundaries or promising a particular legal outcome.

Participation by the person in decisions affecting their life within the actual capacity, safety and legal conditions relevant to the situation.

Support for people to recognize and use their strengths, choices and resources, distinguished from making every decision on their behalf.

An approach identifying capabilities and resources while still examining risks, barriers and needs rather than requiring denial of difficulty.

An approach examining interactions between the person and relevant environments, rather than explaining every issue solely through individual traits.

Individualized professional work using an assessed helping process with a person and relevant systems, distinguished from a promise to solve every problem.

Purposeful work in which group interaction and shared activity contribute to agreed aims, rather than merely seating several clients in one room.

Meaningful involvement of affected people in a community process, requiring attention to access, representation and differing interests.

A structured examination of relevant needs, strengths, resources and priorities, distinguished from assuming that a referral already establishes the full problem.

Agreement based on relevant understandable information and applicable capacity and voluntariness conditions, with limits that need actual contextual assessment.

Appropriate protection and use of personal information under relevant responsibilities and lawful limits, not an unconditional promise of absolute secrecy.

A limit supporting an appropriate helping relationship and role, including recognition of needs beyond the worker competence or authority.

Connection with an appropriate service or professional for a defined need, with attention to consent, information, access and follow-through.

Structured professional examination of practice, judgment and development, distinct from merely approving every action or transferring all accountability.

A reasoned account linking the available evidence, needs, strengths, hypotheses and intervention priorities, which should be revised when evidence changes.

An activity or product delivered by a service, such as a session or contact, distinguished from the resulting change in people circumstances.

A change relevant to the agreed objective, requiring a clear definition and evidence rather than a count of completed activities alone.

Systematic assessment of a program processes and results using appropriate questions, evidence and limitations, not an automatic causal conclusion from a trend.

The outcome that would have occurred under a different condition, which is not directly established by one before-and-after observation.

Purposeful work to represent or support an issue or interest through appropriate channels, with attention to evidence, authority and affected perspectives.