VERDANT launch: clearance risk and filing strategy
GreenSweep Ltd, a UK SME based in Leeds, plans to launch a plant-based cleaning concentrate in April under the word mark VERDANT. It has already printed 20,000 labels and booked a £30,000 Amazon UK campaign. A knockout search shows: (i) UK registration no. 2589124 for VERDANT in Class 3, owned by Verdant Chemicals Ltd, covering cleaning preparations, registered 2012 and renewed 2022; (ii) an unregistered Bristol business, Verdant Home Services, using VERDANT for cleaning services in Class 37 since 2018; (iii) a pending EU application for VERDANT ECO in Classes 3 and 5. GreenSweep's director wants to file a UK application immediately for VERDANT in Classes 3, 5 and 37 and to ignore the earlier mark because 'our formula is different'. The clearance budget is £1,500; launch cannot slip.
1. Assess the clearance risk posed by UK registration no. 2589124 and advise whether GreenSweep should file, modify or seek consent.
Read the worked answer
UK 2589124 is an identical word mark for identical Class 3 goods. Under s.5(2)(b), identity of mark and goods makes likelihood of confusion very high; the examiner will cite it, and use in trade could infringe. The 'different formula' point is irrelevant: trade mark law protects the sign as an indicator of origin, not the recipe. The registration is not obviously invalid; it was renewed in 2022. Non-use is only a potential attack if Verdant Chemicals has not used it for a continuous five-year period, and GreenSweep has no evidence of that. For Class 5, the goods are probably not similar to cleaning preparations, but Class 5 is not the core launch. For Class 37, Verdant Home Services has no registration; passing off requires goodwill in Bristol, misrepresentation and damage. A nationwide launch creates a real Bristol risk, but it is lower than the Class 3 citation. Recommendation: do not file VERDANT in Class 3 without consent or a rebrand. Obtain a written consent/coexistence agreement from Verdant Chemicals if possible; otherwise use GREENSWEEP as the primary mark and do not rely on the printed labels. Filing Class 37 is unnecessary unless services are planned.
2. Design a proportionate pre-filing search plan within the £1,500 budget.
Read the worked answer
Search plan: UK IPO register for exact, phonetic and near variants (VERDANT, VERDENT, VERDANTE, VERDAN) in Classes 3, 5, 35 and 37; EUIPO and WIPO Global Brand Database for EU/Madrid designations; Companies House for company names; domain registries and Amazon Brand Registry; trade press and local Bristol search for Verdant Home Services. Also check unregistered rights via Google, social media and trade directories. Use the UK IPO free search plus a paid database for common-law checks; keep within £1,500 by prioritising UK and EU, not full global coverage. Record search dates and databases. Report: clear risk in Class 3; moderate passing-off risk in Class 37; the EU pending application is not a UK right but should be monitored.
3. What filing strategy would you recommend if GreenSweep insists on launching in April?
Read the worked answer
Because launch cannot slip, options are: (1) negotiate consent from Verdant Chemicals, offering a narrow specification, coexistence terms and no challenge; (2) rebrand labels to GREENSWEEP before April; (3) if proceeding without consent, do not file VERDANT in Class 3 and expect a clean run. Filing identical VERDANT in Class 3 while ignoring the earlier mark invites opposition and infringement. A composite 'GREENSWEEP VERDANT' is unlikely to avoid confusion because VERDANT remains dominant. If consent is unavailable, the least-risk commercial plan is to use GREENSWEEP as the brand and keep VERDANT only as a non-trade-mark descriptor, if that can be defended. File a UK application for GREENSWEEP in Classes 3 and 35 once labels are corrected. Do not file Class 37 unless cleaning services are actually offered.