CompTIA SecAI+ flashcards
CompTIA SecAI+ · Build recall with a focused review session.
33 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- NIST AI RMF functions
- Four functions: GOVERN (continuous, cross-cutting), MAP (context and risk identification), MEASURE (analysis and testing), MANAGE (treatment and monitoring). They form an iterative lifecycle.
- EU AI Act high-risk duties
- High-risk systems require conformity assessment, technical documentation, human oversight, logging, registration in an EU database, and post-market monitoring before market placement.
- ISO/IEC 42001
- Certifiable standard for an AI management system, modeled on ISO 27001, covering AI policy, roles, risk treatment, internal audit, and continual improvement.
- DPIA trigger
- A Data Protection Impact Assessment is required when processing likely poses high risk to individuals, such as AI profiling or large-scale inference on sensitive attributes.
- Model card contents
- A document stating a model's intended use, training data sources, evaluation metrics and results, limitations, and ethical considerations for a specific model version.
- Accountability in AI governance
- Assigning a named risk owner per model and documenting approval gates ensures auditability; unowned models are a frequent audit finding.
- Indirect prompt injection
- Malicious instructions embedded in retrieved documents, web pages, or tool outputs that the model treats as trusted context and may follow.
- Jailbreak versus prompt injection
- Jailbreaks bypass safety alignment to elicit prohibited content; prompt injection subverts the instruction hierarchy to override developer intent. Mitigations differ.
- Backdoor data poisoning
- Planting trigger-activated behavior in training data so the model misbehaves only on specific inputs, evading clean-validation testing.
- Model extraction attack
- Querying a model API extensively to train a surrogate clone, stealing functionality; rate limiting and output watermarking raise attacker cost.
- Membership inference attack
- Determining whether a specific record was part of a model's training data, which can leak sensitive information about individuals.
- Adversarial example transferability
- Perturbations crafted on a surrogate model often misclassify a different black-box target, enabling attacks without direct model access.
- Excessive agency risk
- An LLM agent with broad write or execute permissions converts a prompt injection into real harmful actions; scope tool credentials to least privilege.
- Model weight supply chain risk
- Loading untrusted model files can execute code via pickle deserialization; verify provenance, signatures, and use safe serialization formats.
- RAG retrieval access control
- Authorization must be enforced per document at retrieval time; a shared vector index without filtering leaks documents across tenants.
- Differential privacy epsilon
- A privacy-loss parameter: smaller epsilon gives stronger privacy guarantees and typically lower model utility; larger epsilon does the reverse.
- Confidential computing for inference
- Trusted execution environments isolate prompts and model weights during processing so the host operator cannot read sensitive data in use.
- PII redaction at egress
- Removing or masking personal data before prompts leave the trust boundary, enforced by data loss prevention on outbound API calls.
- Fail-closed guardrails
- When a safety check errors or is uncertain, high-impact actions are blocked; fail-open is acceptable only for low-risk read paths.
- Vector store poisoning
- Injecting malicious or false content into a retrieval index so the model surfaces attacker-controlled text; mitigate by validating and tagging chunks.
- Instruction and data separation
- Structuring prompts so untrusted content is clearly delimited from system instructions, reducing the model's tendency to follow injected commands.
- Hallucinated IOC verification
- Any indicator, hash, or CVE an AI assistant produces must be checked against authoritative threat intelligence before defensive action.
- Human approval for response
- Destructive automated actions such as account disable or host isolation require human sign-off or a deterministic policy engine, not model discretion.
- UEBA baseline drift
- User behavior baselines shift as environments change; scheduled retraining and drift alerts prevent spikes in false positives.
- Adversarial evasion of detectors
- Attackers mutate artifacts until ML classifiers score them benign; ensembles plus rule-based backstops reduce successful evasion in security operations.
- AI triage audit logging
- Recording prompt, retrieved context, model output, and confidence for each automated decision preserves traceability for incident review and compliance.
- Structured alert context
- Supplying parsed fields such as source IP, hash, and rule ID instead of raw logs improves LLM summarization accuracy and reduces hallucination.
- AI threat modeling additions
- AI systems extend STRIDE with prompt injection, data poisoning, model theft, and supply chain tampering as distinct threat categories.
- Immutable model registry
- Each model version is stored with a cryptographic hash and deployments reference the digest, preventing silent substitution of artifacts.
- MLOps promotion gates
- Automated checks for accuracy, bias, and safety red-team results plus a signed model card must pass before a model reaches production.
- Canary model rollout
- Deploying a new model to a small traffic fraction with rollback triggers limits the blast radius of regressions or safety failures.
- AI decommissioning controls
- Retiring a model requires revoking API keys, deleting weights and derived caches, and retaining audit records per the retention policy.
- AI CI/CD artifact scanning
- Pipeline checks scan dependencies and model artifacts for known vulnerabilities, unsafe serialization, and unverified provenance before release.