Security+ study materials
Security+ study resources

Security+ study plan

Security+ · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Security Operations

  • Inventory the asset categories you must manage, then classify ten example systems by data sensitivity, criticality, and ownership.

  • Sequence the vulnerability management lifecycle from discovery through reporting, and identify where each step can fail.

  • Describe how a SIEM correlates log sources, and write three example correlation rules for common attack patterns.

  • Compare firewall, proxy, and network segmentation placements by explaining which attack traffic each control stops.

  • Apply a hardening baseline to a fictional server, listing ten configuration changes and the risk each mitigates.

Your checkpoint

A one-page asset-to-control matrix mapping ten fictional systems to the monitoring, hardening, and segmentation controls that protect them.

Week 2

Security Operations

  • Differentiate authentication, authorization, and accounting controls, then select appropriate factors for three user populations.

  • Contrast SOAR playbooks with manual response by drafting the automated steps that would fire for a suspicious-login alert.

  • Order the incident response phases and map each phase to at least two concrete actions for a ransomware scenario.

  • Distinguish volatile from non-volatile evidence and state the order of collection for a compromised workstation.

  • Plan a backup strategy that satisfies a stated RTO and RPO, choosing between full, incremental, and differential jobs.

Your checkpoint

A ransomware incident response playbook covering all six IR phases, with evidence-collection order and a justified backup/recovery plan.

Week 3

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations

  • Classify threat actors by motivation, capability, and typical targeting, using at least five distinct actor types.

  • Map the attack surface of a fictional organization by listing entry points an external and internal attacker could use.

  • Identify at least eight social engineering techniques and state the control that defeats each one.

  • Distinguish malware families by propagation and payload behavior rather than by name alone.

  • Extract indicators of compromise from a described intrusion and state which are durable versus easily changed.

Your checkpoint

A threat actor profile matrix comparing five actor types across motivation, capability, targeting, and the defensive controls that counter them.

Week 4

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations & General Security Concepts

  • Score five sample vulnerabilities using CVSS metrics and justify each base-score input.

  • Rank a vulnerability list by combined severity, exploitability, and asset criticality, then justify the remediation order.

  • Select mitigations that address root cause, compensating controls that reduce exposure where patching is impossible, and identify when each is acceptable.

  • Contrast preventive, detective, and corrective controls, and label ten given controls by category and function.

  • Explain the security implications of a stated change-management failure and describe the approval gate that would have prevented it.

Your checkpoint

A risk-ranked vulnerability register of ten items, each with a CVSS score, an assigned mitigation or compensating control, and a remediation deadline.

Week 5

Security Architecture

  • Compare on-premises, IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models by stating where the customer retains control in each.

  • Design a zero-trust access decision by identifying the policy enforcement point, the policy decision point, and the signals each consumes.

  • Differentiate virtual machine, container, and serverless isolation boundaries and the escape risks unique to each.

  • Diagram the resilience pattern for a stated availability target, selecting redundancy, failover, and geographic distribution as needed.

  • Select data protection techniques for data at rest, in transit, and in use, and justify each choice against a stated threat.

Your checkpoint

A labeled reference architecture for a fictional hybrid environment showing trust boundaries and where each of ten controls is deployed.

Week 6

Security Program Management and Oversight

  • Distinguish policy, standard, procedure, and guideline, and write one example of each for a stated scenario.

  • Perform a qualitative risk assessment by scoring five identified risks on likelihood and impact, then plot them on a heat map.

  • Assess a fictional vendor's security posture and state the contractual clauses and monitoring obligations that reduce third-party risk.

  • Map a control set to a compliance framework and identify at least three gaps requiring remediation.

  • Design a security awareness program with two measurable behavior outcomes rather than completion metrics alone.

Your checkpoint

A governance package containing a one-page acceptable-use policy, a five-item risk register with heat-map placement, and a third-party risk assessment summary.

Week 7

General Security Concepts

  • Apply the CIA triad and non-repudiation to five described incidents, naming the property violated in each.

  • Classify cryptographic algorithms by symmetric, asymmetric, and hashing use, and state which requirement each satisfies.

  • Trace a certificate's path from issuance through validation and revocation, identifying where trust is anchored.

  • Compare obfuscation, encryption, and hashing by stating the reversibility and use case for each.

  • Distinguish authentication, authorization, and accounting failures in three given log excerpts.

Your checkpoint

A cryptography and PKI reference sheet covering algorithm categories, key exchange, certificate lifecycle, and the control each mechanism supports.

Week 8

Security Operations & Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations & Security Program Management and Oversight

  • Complete two full-length timed practice exams and record per-domain accuracy for each attempt.

  • Re-study only the three lowest-scoring objectives, then re-test each with focused question sets.

  • Diagnose recurring error patterns by categorizing each missed question as knowledge gap, misread, or process error.

  • Reconstruct from memory the six IR phases, the vulnerability management lifecycle, and the risk assessment steps.

Your checkpoint

A remediation log listing every missed objective, its root cause, the corrective action taken, and a verified re-test score of 85% or higher on each.

Milestones

Week 2: Score at least 80% on a 40-question Domain 4 practice set and produce the ransomware IR playbook without reference material.

Week 4: Score at least 80% on a mixed Domain 2 and Domain 1 practice set, and defend the remediation order in the vulnerability register to a study partner or in writing.

Week 6: Complete a full-length timed practice exam at 75% or higher, with no single domain below 65%.

Week 7: Complete a second full-length practice exam at 80% or higher, and confirm Domain 1 accuracy is at or above 75%.

Week 8: Achieve 85% or higher on two consecutive full-length practice exams and clear every entry in the remediation log.