A Discrepancy in the Property Register
You are checking the property register at the end of a shift. Detainee M's stored property is listed as: 1 mobile phone, 1 charger, $60 cash, 1 pair of shoes, 2 books. When you open the sealed bag to verify, you find: 1 mobile phone, 1 charger, $40 cash, 1 pair of shoes, 2 books. The bag seal appears intact, and the register entry was signed at intake three days ago by an officer who is now on leave. A colleague says the $20 difference is trivial, that cash is often miscounted at intake, and that logging a discrepancy will trigger an audit and 'make the whole team look bad'.
1. What is the correct action, and what are the risks of the colleague's suggested approach?
Read the worked answer
Correct action: record the discrepancy accurately and report it. The register is a record of a detainee's property held in trust; your job is to verify it, not to make it match. You record what is physically present ($40, not $60), note the seal was intact and the intake signature and date, and escalate through the property-discrepancy procedure.
Risks of not recording it:
- The discrepancy is now known to you. If you sign the register as correct, you have made a false record - an integrity breach, not a clerical shortcut.
- The detainee may later dispute the missing $20. Without a contemporaneous note, there is no way to establish what happened or when.
- If a later audit finds the gap, the unexplained silence looks far worse than an early report - and it implicates you.
- 'Making the team look bad' is not a legitimate reason to suppress a record. Concealment is the misconduct; a discrepancy may be an honest error.
You are not accusing anyone. You are recording a fact and letting the process determine cause.
2. The colleague is a senior officer who will be on your next several shifts. How do you handle the working relationship while still doing the right thing?
Read the worked answer
Do the right thing first, then manage the relationship deliberately.
- Act, don't debate. Record the discrepancy and report it as procedure requires. This is not discretionary, so framing it as a personal choice invites a fight you don't need.
- Keep the report factual and blame-free. State what was listed, what was found, that the seal was intact, and who signed at intake. Do not speculate about who took the $20 - you don't know.
- Be straightforward with the colleague, briefly and privately: 'I've logged it as found - $40 against $60 on the register. It might just be an intake error, but I can't sign it as correct when it doesn't match.' This signals you are not targeting them and that the record, not the person, is the issue.
- Don't moralise or recruit allies. Avoid discussing it with other staff.
- Expect friction and stay professional. If the colleague becomes hostile or pressures you to amend the record, that is a separate matter to raise with your supervisor.
The standard: you can be a good colleague and an honest record-keeper at the same time. The two only conflict if honesty is treated as disloyalty.
3. Outline how you would write the register entry and report so it is defensible later.
Read the worked answer
A defensible record is specific, contemporaneous, factual, and free of conclusion.
Register entry (example form):
- Date/time of check; your name and role.
- 'Register records $60 cash. Bag opened in presence of [witness]. Contents found: phone, charger, $40 cash, shoes, 2 books. Seal appeared intact on inspection. Register signed at intake [date] by [officer].'
- Discrepancy of $20 noted; reported to [supervisor] at [time].
Principles:
- Record observations, not inferences ('seal appeared intact', not 'no one could have opened it').
- Name a witness where possible - a second person present at the opening removes any suggestion you handled the contents alone.
- Timestamp everything and report promptly; delay weakens the record.
- Don't amend or overwrite the original intake entry - add a separate note so the history is visible.
- Keep language neutral: 'discrepancy identified', not 'cash stolen'.
This protects the detainee, the officer who signed at intake (who may simply have miscounted), and you.