Court Interpreter flashcards
Court Interpreter ยท Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Title VI language access
- Federal law barring national-origin discrimination by federally funded programs; state courts receiving federal funds must provide meaningful access to limited English proficient litigants.
- Executive Order 13166
- Directs federally funded programs to prepare written language access plans; many state court systems adopted such plans or court rules in response.
- Court Interpreters Act of 1978
- Federal statute governing interpreter services in federal courts; it does not apply to state courts, which follow their own rules and statutes.
- Meaningful access standard
- DOJ guidance standard requiring reasonable steps to ensure LEP persons can meaningfully participate; factors include number of LEP persons, frequency of contact, and resources.
- Language access plan
- Written court plan identifying LEP populations, describing interpreter services, training, notice, and monitoring; following it supports a safe harbor from liability.
- I-speak card
- Point-to-language card used to identify an LEP person's language; courts must identify the language rather than assume it from appearance or accent.
- Video remote interpreting
- Interpreting delivered by video link; useful for short or routine matters but disfavored for evidentiary hearings and jury trials where quality is critical.
- State interpreter certification
- Most states certify interpreters through state programs or the Consortium for State Court Interpreter Certification; certification is separate from federal certification.
- Accuracy and completeness
- First ethical canon: render the full message faithfully, preserving meaning, register, and tone, without adding, omitting, or editing content.
- Confidentiality canon
- Interpreter must not disclose information learned during an assignment; exceptions exist only where law requires or the court orders disclosure.
- Impartiality canon
- Interpreter must remain neutral, avoid bias or side conversations, and decline assignments where a relationship or interest creates an appearance of conflict.
- Role boundaries
- Interpreter speaks in the first person for the speaker and does not summarize, explain, or answer questions directed to a party.
- No legal advice rule
- Interpreters may explain their role and the interpreting process but must not explain legal terms, procedures, or consequences to a party.
- Conflict disclosure
- When a potential conflict exists, the interpreter discloses it on the record and lets the judge decide; unilateral mid-proceeding withdrawal is improper.
- Continuing education requirement
- Many states require continuing education units for certification renewal, commonly 10โ20 hours per cycle, to maintain skill and currency.
- Interpreter oath
- Sworn promise to interpret accurately and completely, maintain confidentiality, and remain impartial; administered before the assignment begins.
- Consecutive interpreting
- Speaker pauses at natural boundaries and the interpreter renders afterward, often using notes; standard for witness testimony and short exchanges.
- Simultaneous interpreting
- Interpreter renders while the speaker continues, usually with a headset or whispered mode; standard for long monologues, jury instructions, and sidebars.
- Note-taking for interpreting
- Capture ideas, structure, and links with symbols and abbreviations rather than verbatim words; reserve margin space for names and numbers.
- High-risk items
- Numbers, dates, and proper names are the most error-prone items; note them in digits, verify internally, and never round or approximate.
- Sight translation technique
- Read a passage silently in chunks, then render orally at natural pace; track the line with a finger or pen and avoid paraphrasing legal terms.
- Register matching
- Preserve the speaker's formality level, honorifics, and technical vocabulary; do not upgrade or downgrade register to sound more natural.
- Overlapping speech
- When speakers overlap, the interpreter requests a pause or repetition through the court rather than editing or guessing at content.
- Whispered interpreting
- Chuchotage: simultaneous rendering in a low voice to one or two listeners without equipment; used for short sidebars and bench conferences.
- Arraignment
- Initial criminal appearance where the defendant is informed of charges and enters a plea; a core term in certified court interpreter vocabularies.
- Voir dire
- Jury selection examination of prospective jurors; also used for preliminary examination of a witness's qualifications.
- Allocution
- Defendant's statement to the court before sentencing; the term has a fixed target-language equivalent and should not be paraphrased.
- Hearsay
- Out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted; a core evidentiary term requiring consistent rendering.
- Chain of custody
- Documented record of evidence handling from seizure to trial; a fixed evidentiary term that must be rendered consistently.
- Statute of limitations
- Deadline for filing a civil claim or criminal charge; a civil and criminal term of art with a fixed equivalent.
- False cognates
- Words that look alike across languages but differ in meaning; literal renderings can change legal effect and must be avoided.
- Unknown-term protocol
- When a legal term is not known with confidence, the interpreter pauses, consults a glossary, or states the need to verify; never improvise.