Foot Drop After Positioning: A Demand, a Missing Record Entry, and a Notice Deadline
A 58-year-old woman underwent a laparoscopic gynecologic procedure at a 240-bed community hospital. In the recovery room she reported left foot drop; electromyography three weeks later confirmed a femoral nerve injury consistent with intraoperative positioning. The operative note states "positioning per protocol," but the OR record contains no positioning entry for the 45 minutes between induction and incision. The patient filed suit 20 months after surgery. The state has a two-year statute of limitations and requires 180 days' written notice of intent before suit may be filed. Plaintiff's demand is $850,000. Defense counsel assesses liability at 40% and damages between $400,000 and $1.2 million; trial would cost roughly $150,000 in defense fees. The facility carries a $1 million per-claim policy with a $250,000 self-insured retention.
1. Should the claims committee authorize settlement near the $850,000 demand? Present the reasoning you would bring to the committee.
Read the worked answer
Start with expected value, then stress-test it.
- Expected indemnity: 40% liability × midpoint damages ($800,000) = $320,000.
- Expected total exposure if tried: $320,000 + $150,000 defense = $470,000 (upper bound at 40% × $1.2M = $480,000 + $150,000 = $630,000).
- The demand of $850,000 sits well above the expected value and above the worst realistic trial outcome on these inputs.
But the value of the case is not fixed. The notice requirement is the pivot: if the plaintiff did not serve written notice at least 180 days before filing, the complaint may be vulnerable to a motion to dismiss, which would reset the negotiating posture entirely. Verify the service date and any tolling agreement before authorizing money.
Also model the SIR: the first $250,000 of any settlement is the facility's own money, so the committee is really comparing $250,000 out-of-pocket plus premium impact against defense costs and reputational exposure. A defensible position: file the motion, negotiate in the $300,000–$450,000 range, and hold authority below the demand.
2. How should risk management handle the missing positioning documentation, and does it alter disclosure strategy?
Read the worked answer
The worst response is to reconstruct the note. Never backfill the intraoperative record; a late entry must be clearly labeled as such and dated at the time it is written, and it should record only facts personally known to the author.
Practical sequence:
- Place a litigation hold on the original record, the anesthesia record, and the OR scheduling and staffing data.
- Interview the circulating nurse and anesthesia staff promptly, while memory is intact, and capture statements through counsel where privileged.
- Determine whether the gap reflects a documentation failure only (positioning done but not charted) or a care failure. Those have different implications for both defense and disclosure.
- Notify the carrier of the claim and of any potential spoliation issue.
On disclosure: a genuine documentation gap is an honesty problem, not just a legal one. If the gap would be material to the patient's understanding of what happened, disclosure through the facility's open-communication process - by a trained clinician, with an apology for the experience, not an admission of fault - reduces the chance the family learns of it first from an expert witness.
3. The CEO asks whether the hospital should change its positioning policy as a result of this case. What is your recommendation?
Read the worked answer
Separate the individual claim from the system signal. One claim with a plausible documentation gap does not by itself prove a practice problem, but it does justify a targeted look.
Recommend:
- A short audit of 30–50 consecutive laparoscopic and lithotomy cases for presence of a positioning entry, time-stamped, with laterality and nerve-protection elements.
- Compare against the actual OR workflow: is there a positioning field in the intraoperative record, or is positioning documented on a separate paper form that gets filed elsewhere? The gap may be a form-design problem rather than a behavior problem.
- If the audit shows a systemic gap, route it to the OR committee and the patient safety program as a documentation-integrity project with a measurable target, not as a policy memo.
Avoid using the claim as the sole driver of a policy change; the credibility of the change depends on the audit data.