CQPA flashcards
CQPA · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Cp
- Process potential capability index equal to specification width divided by six sigma: (USL − LSL)/(6σ). It ignores centering, so a process can have high Cp yet still produce defects.
- Cpk
- Process actual capability index: the minimum of the upper and lower distances from the mean to the specification limit, each divided by 3σ. It penalizes off-center processes, unlike Cp.
- Repeatability
- Variation observed when one appraiser measures the same part repeatedly with the same gauge under identical conditions. It reflects equipment variation within the measurement system.
- Reproducibility
- Variation in measurements arising between different appraisers using the same gauge on the same parts. It reflects operator or appraiser variation in the measurement system.
- AQL
- Acceptable Quality Level: the maximum defective rate considered acceptable as a process average for acceptance sampling. It defines the producer's risk point on an operating characteristic curve.
- Cost of quality
- The total of prevention, appraisal, internal failure, and external failure costs. Failure costs, especially external failures, are usually the largest and most reducible category.
- Pareto principle
- The observation that roughly 80 percent of effects come from about 20 percent of causes. A Pareto chart ranks causes by frequency so improvement effort targets the largest contributors first.
- PDCA cycle
- Plan-Do-Check-Act: a repeating improvement cycle in which a change is planned, piloted, verified against expected results, and then standardized or revised.
- Standard deviation
- The square root of the variance, expressing typical dispersion around the mean in the original units. Approximately 68 percent of normal data lie within one standard deviation of the mean.
- Null hypothesis
- The default statistical statement of no difference or no effect. It is retained unless sample evidence produces a p-value below the chosen significance level alpha.
- Type I error
- Rejecting a true null hypothesis, also called producer's risk or alpha. Its probability is the significance level chosen for the test, commonly 0.05.
- Type II error
- Failing to reject a false null hypothesis, also called consumer's risk or beta. Statistical power equals one minus beta and increases with larger sample sizes.
- p-value
- The probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the sample result, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Reject the null when it is below alpha.
- Confidence interval
- A range of plausible values for a population parameter, constructed at a stated confidence level. Wider intervals accompany higher confidence levels and smaller sample sizes.
- Correlation coefficient
- A value from minus one to plus one measuring the strength and direction of linear association between two variables. It does not by itself demonstrate causation.
- Coefficient of determination
- R-squared: the proportion of total variation in the response variable explained by the regression model. Values near one indicate a strong fit to the observed data.
- ANOVA
- Analysis of variance: a test comparing means of three or more groups by partitioning total variation into between-group and within-group components, evaluated with an F statistic.
- Central limit theorem
- The sampling distribution of the mean approaches normality as sample size grows, regardless of the population shape. It underpins many control charts and confidence intervals.
- Nominal data
- Data consisting of unordered labels or categories such as machine type or defect code. Only counts and proportions are meaningful; averages and standard deviations are invalid.
- SIPOC diagram
- A high-level process map listing Suppliers, Inputs, Process steps, Outputs, and Customers. It defines process boundaries before detailed flowcharting begins.
- FMEA
- Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: a structured risk assessment scoring severity, occurrence, and detection for each failure mode. The product, the Risk Priority Number, ranks items for action.
- Five Whys
- A root cause technique that repeatedly asks why a problem occurred, typically about five times, until the underlying systemic cause is identified rather than a symptom.
- Cause-and-effect diagram
- Also called Ishikawa or fishbone diagram: it organizes potential causes of a problem into branches such as Man, Machine, Material, Method, Measurement, and Environment.
- Control chart
- A time-ordered plot of a process characteristic with a centerline and statistically derived control limits. Points beyond limits or nonrandom patterns signal special-cause variation.
- Common cause variation
- Inherent, stable variation produced by the process itself. It is reduced by changing the process, not by adjusting individual points or blaming operators.
- Special cause variation
- Unpredictable variation from an identifiable source outside the normal process, signalled by control chart rules. It requires investigation and removal of the specific cause.
- Process cycle efficiency
- Value-added time divided by total lead time, expressed as a percentage. It quantifies how much of the process duration actually adds value for the customer.
- Poka-yoke
- Error-proofing: a design or device that prevents a mistake from being made or makes it immediately obvious, eliminating defects at the source rather than detecting them later.
- 5S
- Workplace organization method with five steps: Sort, Set in order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain. It reduces search time and motion waste while making abnormal conditions visible.
- Kaizen
- Continuous incremental improvement involving the people who do the work. Kaizen events are short, focused workshops that implement changes quickly and standardize the results.
- Control plan
- A document specifying the controls applied to each significant process or product characteristic, including monitoring method, sample frequency, and the reaction plan when out of control.
- Corrective action
- Action taken to eliminate the root cause of a detected nonconformity so it does not recur. It is distinct from containment, which addresses the immediate symptom.