A fictional public training program
A fictional public program reports one hundred completed training sessions against a target of one hundred. Its report calls the program fully effective, but participant attendance is inconsistently recorded and no follow-up skill evidence is available. Procurement records show that the least expensive venue was selected, although many intended participants could not reach it. A data dashboard contains duplicate participant identifiers and inconsistent district labels. The case gives no actual national budget rule or sanction power. Students must distinguish economy, efficiency and effectiveness, evaluate the evidence behind the dashboard and propose a bounded performance-audit finding. The task is not to declare an official guilty or to infer that the program had no benefit simply because the current evidence is incomplete.
1. What conclusion is supported?
Read the worked answer
The reported session count meets the stated output target, but effectiveness is not established. Access, attendance and later skill outcomes require better evidence, and low venue price alone does not prove economy for the intended service.
2. How should the data issue be handled?
Read the worked answer
Validate identifiers and definitions, investigate duplication and reconcile to underlying records before using totals. Frame findings against suitable criteria and separate established conditions from untested causal explanations.