CTSP study materials
CTSP study resources

CTSP study plan

CTSP · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Threat Intelligence Fundamentals and Frameworks

  • Define the intelligence cycle and map each of its six stages to a concrete CTI workflow you could run in a small security team

  • Compare the main analytic frameworks (kill chain, MITRE ATT&CK, Diamond Model, Pyramid of Pain) and state in writing which question each one answers best

  • Distinguish tactical, operational, and strategic intelligence and give two realistic consumers for each tier

  • Explain confidence levels, sourcing, and the difference between data, information, and intelligence using your own examples

Your checkpoint

A one-page framework comparison matrix (framework, core question, output artifact, best consumer) plus a 300-word note on how the frameworks chain together

Week 2

Threat Landscape and Actor Analysis

  • Classify threat actors into commodity crime, organized crime, hacktivism, insider, and state-sponsored categories with distinguishing behaviors for each

  • Describe the motivations, resourcing, and targeting patterns that separate nation-state espionage from financially motivated intrusion

  • Trace at least three named intrusion sets through ATT&CK group pages and record their preferred initial access and persistence techniques

  • Explain sector-specific targeting trends for at least three industries and the reasoning behind them

Your checkpoint

An actor profile dossier of three intrusion sets, each with motivation, capability, targeting, and a mapped ATT&CK technique list of at least eight techniques

Week 3

Collection Sources and Collection Planning

  • Build a collection plan template that starts from priority intelligence requirements rather than from available feeds

  • Evaluate at least six source types (OSINT, commercial feeds, ISAC sharing, malware sandboxes, dark web, internal telemetry) on reliability, timeliness, and cost

  • Apply the Admiralty source reliability and information credibility grading scheme to ten sample reports

  • Identify legal and sharing constraints that limit what each source can be redistributed

Your checkpoint

A written collection plan with three PIRs, mapped sources, collection cadence, and a source reliability scoring table

Week 4

Intelligence Analysis and Structured Analytic Techniques

  • Apply at least five structured analytic techniques (ACH, key assumptions check, devil's advocacy, what-if analysis, indicators of change) to a sample intrusion scenario

  • Demonstrate how to mitigate at least four cognitive biases including anchoring, confirmation, and availability bias

  • Draft intelligence requirements that are specific, answerable, and tied to a decision the stakeholder must make

  • Write a confidence statement that separates what is known, what is inferred, and what is assumed

Your checkpoint

A completed analysis worksheet using ACH on a scenario with at least four competing hypotheses, plus a bias mitigation checklist

Week 5

Indicators of Compromise and Threat Hunting

  • Differentiate IOCs by durability (hash, IP, domain, behavioral TTP) and rank them by cost to the adversary

  • Write at least three Sigma rules and two YARA rules that detect behavior rather than a single artifact

  • Design a hypothesis-driven threat hunt from a PIR through data source selection to detection validation

  • Explain IOC lifecycle, decay, false positive management, and enrichment before operational use

Your checkpoint

A threat hunt package containing a hypothesis, required data sources, three Sigma rules, two YARA rules, and expected false-positive analysis

Week 6

Threat Intelligence Platforms and Tooling & Indicators of Compromise and Threat Hunting

  • Compare TIP, SIEM, SOAR, and MISP capabilities and state which problem each one solves

  • Configure a small MISP instance or equivalent lab and ingest, tag, and correlate at least twenty indicators

  • Automate one enrichment or indicator-to-detection pipeline end to end and document its failure modes

  • Evaluate a platform against requirements covering data model, integrations, sharing, and access control

Your checkpoint

A working lab pipeline (ingest, enrich, tag, export to detection) with a short architecture diagram and a written tool comparison

Week 7

Dissemination, Reporting, and Stakeholder Communication

  • Tailor the same finding for a SOC analyst, a CISO, and a business owner, adjusting depth, jargon, and decision framing

  • Structure a threat report using a BLUF (bottom line up front) format with key judgments, confidence, and recommended actions

  • Write dissemination rules that define audience, classification, handling caveats, and feedback loop

  • Deliver a five-minute verbal briefing without notes and handle two challenging follow-up questions

Your checkpoint

One intelligence product in three audience-specific versions plus a dissemination and handling plan

Week 8

Legal, Ethical, and Operational Security Considerations & Threat Intelligence Fundamentals and Frameworks & Intelligence Analysis and Structured Analytic Techniques

  • Apply legal constraints on collection, handling, and sharing including privacy, data protection, and terms of service for OSINT sources

  • Identify operational security failures in a threat intelligence workflow and design controls to prevent analyst attribution or exposure

  • Explain ethical obligations around handling victim data, disclosure coordination, and responsible sharing

  • Run a full timed practice exam and review every missed item against its source domain

Your checkpoint

A full-length timed practice exam with a scored error log mapping each miss to a domain and a written remediation action

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain the intelligence cycle, compare four analytic frameworks, and profile three actor sets from memory without notes

Week 3: Collection plan is written and each source is graded for reliability and sharing constraints

Week 4: Completed ACH worksheet with at least four hypotheses and a defensible confidence statement

Week 6: Lab pipeline ingests, enriches, and exports indicators, and three Sigma rules fire in a test harness

Week 7: Three audience versions of one report delivered and a five-minute briefing given without notes

Week 8: Practice exam score at or above 80 percent with every miss mapped to a domain and remediation action