CVPM study materials
CVPM study resources

The 27-Minute Wait

CVPM · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The 27-Minute Wait

Northgate Veterinary Clinic has four full-time veterinarians, five exam rooms, and 15-minute appointment slots. Each veterinarian is templated for 22 appointments a day. The front desk reports an average check-in-to-room time of 27 minutes. About 31% of clients arrive more than 10 minutes late, and 14% of wellness appointments are no-shows. Six urgent-care cases a day are routinely double-booked into slots that are already full. Surgical discharges cluster between 4:00 and 5:30 pm and compete for the same two technicians who room appointments. A time study shows technicians spend 11 minutes per appointment on rooming and history, veterinarians spend 9 minutes of face time, and exam rooms sit idle for 18 minutes per appointment. The manager has no budget for additional staff or rooms this year.

1. Identify the real constraint and calculate whether the practice is out of capacity or out of flow.

Read the worked answer

Do the arithmetic before adding anything. Four veterinarians x 22 appointments = 88 appointment slots per day, or 11 per veterinarian per hour in an eight-hour day, which is not possible with 9 minutes of face time and 15-minute slots. Five rooms turning every 15 minutes for eight hours would provide 160 room-slots, so rooms are not the pure constraint. The 18 minutes of idle room time per appointment is the signal: the practice has capacity but is losing it to late arrivals, double-booked urgencies, and discharge collisions. Technician time is also a constraint: 11 minutes x 88 appointments = 968 minutes, or 16.1 technician-hours per day just for rooming, before discharges. The manager should measure arrival patterns, room turnover, and technician availability by hour. The likely conclusion is that flow, not headcount, is the problem, and adding staff would hide it.

2. Propose a redesigned daily template and two operational rules that could reduce waits without adding staff.

Read the worked answer

Protect capacity instead of filling it. Create a daily urgent-care block of six slots, two in the morning and four in the afternoon, and stop double-booking urgencies into wellness slots. Stagger veterinarian start times by 15 minutes so all four do not need rooms and technicians at the same moment. Move surgical discharges to a dedicated 3:30-4:30 window staffed by one technician, with discharge instructions pre-printed, so the 4:00-5:30 collision disappears. For late arrivals, publish a 10-minute grace policy: after 10 minutes, the appointment is rebooked or converted to a drop-off, which reduces the ripple effect on the next three clients. For no-shows, require confirmation at 48 and 24 hours and release unconfirmed slots. Predict the effect: if late-arrival disruption falls by half and the six urgencies stop displacing wellness slots, room idle time should fall and the 27-minute wait should drop before any hiring decision.

3. What metrics should the manager track, and what would tell the manager the redesign is failing?

Read the worked answer

Track four things weekly: median check-in-to-room time, not just the average, because a few long waits distort the mean; room turnover time between appointments; percentage of appointments starting within five minutes of the scheduled time; and the number of urgent cases seen within 30 minutes. Also track staff overtime and the 4:00-5:30 discharge backlog. A dashboard is only useful if it is reviewed with the team and tied to a test period. The redesign is failing if median wait does not fall within four weeks, if urgent cases are still displacing scheduled wellness slots, or if overtime rises because discharges were moved without staffing them. If waits improve only by pushing work after hours, the practice has shifted the constraint, not solved it. In that case, revisit the template before requesting more staff or rooms.