CVPM study materials
CVPM study resources

3.8 Stars and a $49 Exam

CVPM · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

3.8 Stars and a $49 Exam

Sunset Boulevard Animal Hospital is an independent three-doctor practice. New-client visits are down 16% year over year. A corporate-owned competitor opened 1.2 miles away, advertises a $49 exam, and offers online booking. The hospital's Google rating is 3.8 from 52 reviews; the four most recent negative reviews cite long waits, surprise charges, and a 'pushy' supplement recommendation. The website is not mobile-friendly, and analytics show 62% of visitors are on mobile. The practice spends $1,500 a month: $900 on a print directory and $600 on boosted social posts with no tracking. The owner wants to match the $49 exam and run a Groupon. The manager has $2,000 a month and one part-time marketing coordinator.

1. Evaluate the owner's price-matching and Groupon proposals using margin and client-value reasoning.

Read the worked answer

Price matching is a margin decision, not a marketing decision. If the practice's average exam fee is $75 and the cost of a doctor visit plus staff time is roughly $45, a $49 exam still has a contribution margin, but it attracts clients whose main criterion is price. Those clients often decline diagnostics and are the first to leave for the next promotion. Model the break-even: at $49, the practice needs enough incremental services per new client to recover the $26 discount plus acquisition cost; if only 30% of coupon clients return, the lifetime value may never cover it. A Groupon adds a platform fee and typically brings high-volume, low-retention traffic that strains the schedule and staff morale. The stronger counterproposal is to compete on access and trust: mobile-friendly online booking, transparent estimates, and a review-recovery process. Matching the competitor validates its price frame and does not fix the 3.8 rating that is driving the decline.

2. Allocate the $2,000 monthly budget with specific tactics and a rationale.

Read the worked answer

Split the budget between fixing the conversion path and rebuilding reputation. Allocate about $600 one-time or first-month to make the website mobile-responsive and add online booking; if the platform fee is monthly, cap it at $300. Allocate $400 to review response and reputation work: the manager responds to every review within 48 hours, asks satisfied clients for reviews at discharge, and trains the team on the ask. Allocate $500 to reactivation of inactive clients using email and text, which is cheaper than new-client acquisition. Allocate $300 to local community presence, such as a rescue-partner event or school outreach, with a tracked landing page. Keep $500 as a test budget for search ads on 'veterinarian near me' and measure cost per booked appointment, not clicks. Cut the untracked boosted posts and the print directory unless it produces calls. Every tactic needs a unique phone number, landing page, or promo code.

3. Draft a response to a negative review that mentions wait time and surprise charges, and explain the ethical limits.

Read the worked answer

A workable response: 'Thank you for telling us about your visit. A long wait and an unexpected charge are not the experience we want to provide. We cannot discuss a specific client's care publicly, but we would like to hear more and make it right. Please call our practice manager at [number].' This acknowledges the experience without confirming that the reviewer is a client, which protects confidentiality. Do not argue about the medical record, disclose treatment details, or offer a refund in the public thread. Internally, investigate the estimate process and the schedule that day; if the complaint is accurate, fix the cause. The ethical limits are confidentiality, honesty, and not incentivizing reviews. Do not offer discounts for positive reviews or ask staff to post fake ones. A single calm response will not fix a 3.8 rating; consistent follow-through on waits and estimates will.