The Front Desk Language Memo
A 90-room hotel in a tourist district receives a complaint from a Canadian guest. She says the receptionist spoke 'broken English' when giving directions to a local taxi driver. The receptionist is fluent in Standard English but switched to the local Creole because the driver uses it and the directions were complex. The manager responds with a memo: 'All staff will speak only Standard English while on property.' Front-desk staff say they now feel monitored; two local guests say the hotel feels 'cold.' Head office asks for a language policy that protects service standards without damaging staff morale. The hotel serves both international visitors and local residents, and several staff are bilingual in Standard English and Creole.
1. Analyse the guest's complaint using concepts of language attitudes and communicative competence.
Read the worked answer
The guest's phrase 'broken English' expresses a language attitude, not a linguistic description. She is treating Standard English as the only complete or proper form and interpreting Creole as deficient. In fact, the receptionist is fluent in Standard English and made a code-switch for a specific audience: the local taxi driver. That is evidence of communicative competence, because the speaker selected the code most likely to achieve clear directions.
The guest overheard a conversation that was not primarily addressed to her. Her judgement is based on prestige and accent, not on whether the directions worked. A more accurate service question would be: did the driver understand the route, and did the guest receive clear information when it was her turn?
However, the guest's perception still matters commercially. If she felt excluded, the hotel has a service issue to address. The response should separate the linguistic judgement ('broken') from the service experience ('I felt ignored'). The receptionist's switch was not incompetence; the hotel needs to explain its language practice without accepting the premise that Creole is inferior.
2. Evaluate the manager's memo as a language policy, identifying two likely consequences.
Read the worked answer
The memo treats a complex service situation as a rule violation. It is a ban, not a policy: it does not distinguish between speaking to an international guest, speaking to a local driver, or speaking to a bilingual local guest.
Consequence 1: poorer service to local users. If staff must use only Standard English with taxi drivers and local guests who normally use Creole, directions may become slower or less clear. The policy could reduce, rather than improve, communication.
Consequence 2: morale and resistance. Staff report feeling monitored, which suggests the memo has damaged trust. Employees may comply resentfully, avoid speaking Creole where it would help, or hide their language use. A policy that cannot be enforced consistently breeds cynicism.
A third likely consequence is loss of local authenticity: local guests already say the hotel feels 'cold.' The memo also fails to educate the complaining guest or address her sense of exclusion. It responds to a language attitude with a language restriction instead of a service standard. The policy is therefore likely to satisfy no one fully and to create new problems.
3. Propose a revised policy that meets guest service standards and respects staff language repertoire.
Read the worked answer
Purpose statement: The hotel will ensure clear, courteous communication with all guests and local service partners, recognising that staff may use more than one language variety.
Guidelines:
- Use Standard English for initial guest greetings, formal explanations, written materials and any conversation with a guest who does not use Creole.
- Staff may switch to Creole or local dialect when speaking with local drivers, suppliers or guests who use it, especially when clarity or warmth is improved.
- If a guest seems excluded, staff should acknowledge the guest, explain briefly what is happening, and return to the guest's preferred language.
- Treat complaints as service feedback, not as proof that a staff member's language is deficient. Investigate what the guest needed, not simply which code was used.
Support: Train staff in audience awareness, plain English and explaining local language use courteously. Display a short welcome message in Standard English and offer interpretation where needed.
Review: Monitor guest satisfaction and staff feedback after three months. This policy protects service standards because it focuses on comprehension and courtesy, while respecting the bilingual repertoire that actually helps the hotel serve both international and local clients.