CAPE Communication Studies study materials
CAPE Communication Studies study resources

CAPE Communication Studies cheat sheet

CAPE Communication Studies · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Gathering, Organising and Processing Information

  • Source types rank by authority: primary (raw data, eyewitness, original documents) > secondary (interpretation of primary) > tertiary (indexes, summaries, encyclopaedias used only as pointers).

  • Reliability test: currency, authority of author, accuracy/corroboration, objectivity/purpose, and coverage - a source failing two or more is downgraded regardless of how readable it is.

  • Sampling vocabulary: random, stratified, systematic, quota, convenience. Convenience and quota samples are non-probability, so results cannot be generalised to a population.

  • Questionnaire design rules: avoid leading, double-barrelled and ambiguous items; closed items give quantifiable data, open items give depth; pilot before administering.

  • Plagiarism is using another's words, ideas, data or structure without acknowledgement; paraphrase still requires citation, and direct quotation requires quotation marks plus source.

  • Citation elements for a book: author surname and initials, year, title (italicised), place of publication, publisher; for a journal article add volume, issue and page range.

  • Organising patterns: chronological (time), spatial (place), cause–effect, problem–solution, comparison–contrast, order of importance. Choose the pattern that matches the relationship between ideas.

  • Data presentation decisions: tables for precise multi-variable figures, bar charts for comparisons across categories, line graphs for trends over time, pie charts only for parts of one whole.

  • Processing tools: summarising reduces to main idea plus key supporting points; note-taking should distinguish quotation, paraphrase and personal comment to prevent accidental plagiarism.

Quick reference

Language and Community

  • Language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols shared by a community; the arbitrary link between signifier and signified is what makes conventions, not nature, govern meaning.

  • Standard English is a prestige variety sustained by institutions (schools, media, courts); it is not linguistically superior, only socially dominant. Dialects are rule-governed, complete systems.

  • Register = variation by situation, shaped by field (topic), tenor (relationship/status of participants) and mode (spoken/written, monologue/dialogue).

  • Creole continuum terms: basilect (most creole-like), mesolect (intermediate), acrolect (closest to standard). Speakers shift along the continuum by audience and context.

  • Pidgin versus creole: a pidgin is a contact language with no native speakers; when children acquire it natively and it expands, it becomes a creole.

  • Language attitudes: overt prestige attaches to standard varieties; covert prestige attaches to local varieties as markers of identity and solidarity. Neither reflects cognitive ability.

  • Communication components: sender, message, channel, receiver, feedback, noise (physical, semantic, psychological). Noise at any point distorts meaning.

  • Non-verbal codes: proxemics (space), kinesics (body movement), haptics (touch), chronemics (time), paralanguage (tone, pitch, pace). Non-verbal cues can contradict verbal ones.

  • Community language functions: instrumental (getting things done), regulatory, interactional, personal, heuristic, imaginative, representational - each maps to different social purposes.

Quick reference

Speaking and Writing

  • Expository essay structure: introduction with thesis and preview, body paragraphs each carrying one controlling idea plus evidence, conclusion that synthesises rather than repeats.

  • Paragraph unity test: every sentence must support the topic sentence; coherence comes from transitions (however, therefore, in contrast) and from consistent pronoun reference.

  • Argument forms: inductive moves from specific evidence to general claim; deductive moves from general premise to specific conclusion (syllogism: major premise, minor premise, conclusion).

  • Common fallacies: ad hominem, straw man, false dilemma, slippery slope, post hoc, hasty generalisation, appeal to authority/emotion. Naming the fallacy is not enough - explain why reasoning fails.

  • Persuasive appeals: ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion), logos (logic). Strong persuasion combines all three with evidence, not assertion.

  • Speech delivery: manuscript, memorised, impromptu, extemporaneous. Extemporaneous (planned but spoken from brief notes) usually produces the most natural audience contact.

  • Audience analysis variables: age, gender, education, occupation, cultural background, prior knowledge and attitude toward the topic; adjust vocabulary, examples and evidence type accordingly.

  • Mechanics: subject–verb agreement, tense consistency, pronoun–antecedent agreement, parallel structure in lists, and avoidance of comma splices and run-ons.

  • Summary writing rules: cut examples and repetition, retain main idea and essential support, keep the original's stance, use own words, and stay within the stated word limit.

Quick reference

Examination Skills and Textual Analysis

  • Module 1 paper typically requires a factual/informational piece grounded in provided stimulus material; marks reward selection, organisation and citation of sources, not opinion alone.

  • Module 2 questions usually require a persuasive or argumentative response on a language-and-community issue; the mark scheme rewards a clear stance, structured argument and language awareness.

  • Module 3 asks for a short story, descriptive piece or speech depending on the prompt; narrative marking rewards plot coherence, characterisation, setting, conflict and point of view.

  • Mark allocation guide: content/ideas, organisation/structure, language/mechanics and (where stated) audience awareness are separately scored - a weak area cannot be offset by strength elsewhere.

  • Time budgeting: allocate roughly the number of marks per question in minutes, keep 5–10 minutes for proofreading, and never leave a required section blank.

  • When a question supplies data (table, chart, extract), quote specific figures or phrases in the response; unsupported generalisation loses content marks.

  • Planning before writing: 3–5 minutes producing a skeleton outline with thesis and paragraph topics reduces off-topic drift and improves coherence scores.